Prioritizing populations based on recovery potential

Abstract For wide‐ranging species, it is often too expensive or politically challenging to effectively implement conservation action across their range. In these cases, conservation actions may be vigorously applied where the situation appears most dire, but inadvertently at the expense of where suc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation Science and Practice
Main Authors: Michelle L. McLellan, Melanie Dickie, Stan Boutin, Marcus Becker, Bevan Ernst, Darcy Peel, Kathryn L. Zimmerman, Robert Serrouya
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12905
https://doaj.org/article/ee5cf8fe70604070aa801cc42f7dfcc1
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ee5cf8fe70604070aa801cc42f7dfcc1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ee5cf8fe70604070aa801cc42f7dfcc1 2023-05-15T18:04:23+02:00 Prioritizing populations based on recovery potential Michelle L. McLellan Melanie Dickie Stan Boutin Marcus Becker Bevan Ernst Darcy Peel Kathryn L. Zimmerman Robert Serrouya 2023-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12905 https://doaj.org/article/ee5cf8fe70604070aa801cc42f7dfcc1 EN eng Wiley https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12905 https://doaj.org/toc/2578-4854 2578-4854 doi:10.1111/csp2.12905 https://doaj.org/article/ee5cf8fe70604070aa801cc42f7dfcc1 Conservation Science and Practice, Vol 5, Iss 4, Pp n/a-n/a (2023) adaptive management habitat protection mountain caribou population viability Rangifer tarandus species recovery Ecology QH540-549.5 General. Including nature conservation geographical distribution QH1-199.5 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12905 2023-04-09T00:30:38Z Abstract For wide‐ranging species, it is often too expensive or politically challenging to effectively implement conservation action across their range. In these cases, conservation actions may be vigorously applied where the situation appears most dire, but inadvertently at the expense of where success is more probable. Consequently, it is prudent to use a prioritization approach that highlights areas of probable success. Using Southern Mountain Caribou as a target species, we develop a simple algorithm that integrates scaled habitat quality measures and population characteristics known to affect the demographics of caribou and weights them according to their relative importance as defined by expert opinion. The algorithm ranks subpopulations by their relative conservation status and, as a result, how likely they are to respond to additional conservation efforts and contribute to long‐term species persistence. Sensitivity analyses are then used to measure the implications of variance among key criteria and the potential variance in expert weighting. The transparent method quickly allows for real, or potential changes in criteria values, scaling, or their relative weighting, thus providing a baseline metric for conservation discussion, subpopulation comparisons, and adaptive management action. A web‐based application of the algorithm can be used directly or adapted for other species. This transparent framework can be used by conservation scientists and managers for prioritizing populations for receiving recovery actions to maximize long‐term conservation impact. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rangifer tarandus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Conservation Science and Practice 5 4
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic adaptive management
habitat protection
mountain caribou
population viability
Rangifer tarandus
species recovery
Ecology
QH540-549.5
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
spellingShingle adaptive management
habitat protection
mountain caribou
population viability
Rangifer tarandus
species recovery
Ecology
QH540-549.5
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
Michelle L. McLellan
Melanie Dickie
Stan Boutin
Marcus Becker
Bevan Ernst
Darcy Peel
Kathryn L. Zimmerman
Robert Serrouya
Prioritizing populations based on recovery potential
topic_facet adaptive management
habitat protection
mountain caribou
population viability
Rangifer tarandus
species recovery
Ecology
QH540-549.5
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
description Abstract For wide‐ranging species, it is often too expensive or politically challenging to effectively implement conservation action across their range. In these cases, conservation actions may be vigorously applied where the situation appears most dire, but inadvertently at the expense of where success is more probable. Consequently, it is prudent to use a prioritization approach that highlights areas of probable success. Using Southern Mountain Caribou as a target species, we develop a simple algorithm that integrates scaled habitat quality measures and population characteristics known to affect the demographics of caribou and weights them according to their relative importance as defined by expert opinion. The algorithm ranks subpopulations by their relative conservation status and, as a result, how likely they are to respond to additional conservation efforts and contribute to long‐term species persistence. Sensitivity analyses are then used to measure the implications of variance among key criteria and the potential variance in expert weighting. The transparent method quickly allows for real, or potential changes in criteria values, scaling, or their relative weighting, thus providing a baseline metric for conservation discussion, subpopulation comparisons, and adaptive management action. A web‐based application of the algorithm can be used directly or adapted for other species. This transparent framework can be used by conservation scientists and managers for prioritizing populations for receiving recovery actions to maximize long‐term conservation impact.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Michelle L. McLellan
Melanie Dickie
Stan Boutin
Marcus Becker
Bevan Ernst
Darcy Peel
Kathryn L. Zimmerman
Robert Serrouya
author_facet Michelle L. McLellan
Melanie Dickie
Stan Boutin
Marcus Becker
Bevan Ernst
Darcy Peel
Kathryn L. Zimmerman
Robert Serrouya
author_sort Michelle L. McLellan
title Prioritizing populations based on recovery potential
title_short Prioritizing populations based on recovery potential
title_full Prioritizing populations based on recovery potential
title_fullStr Prioritizing populations based on recovery potential
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing populations based on recovery potential
title_sort prioritizing populations based on recovery potential
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12905
https://doaj.org/article/ee5cf8fe70604070aa801cc42f7dfcc1
genre Rangifer tarandus
genre_facet Rangifer tarandus
op_source Conservation Science and Practice, Vol 5, Iss 4, Pp n/a-n/a (2023)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12905
https://doaj.org/toc/2578-4854
2578-4854
doi:10.1111/csp2.12905
https://doaj.org/article/ee5cf8fe70604070aa801cc42f7dfcc1
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12905
container_title Conservation Science and Practice
container_volume 5
container_issue 4
_version_ 1766175741188243456