Pro et contra of frontier interpretation of Sintashta antiquities (Bronze Age in the Southern Urals)

The practice of archaeological research often illustrates situations where the sum of facts does not correspond to the cultural-historical approach; it is impossible to squeeze this sum into the framework of the term “archaeological culture”. Deviations from his canonical understanding of the term m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII, ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII
Main Author: Epimakhov A.V.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Russian
Published: Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RA 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2023-62-3-3
https://doaj.org/article/ee49cba019e84fb3832e1254ce9ec715
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ee49cba019e84fb3832e1254ce9ec715
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ee49cba019e84fb3832e1254ce9ec715 2023-10-09T21:56:22+02:00 Pro et contra of frontier interpretation of Sintashta antiquities (Bronze Age in the Southern Urals) Epimakhov A.V. 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2023-62-3-3 https://doaj.org/article/ee49cba019e84fb3832e1254ce9ec715 RU rus Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RA http://ipdn.ru/_private/a62/26-35.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1811-7465 https://doaj.org/toc/2071-0437 doi:10.20874/2071-0437-2023-62-3-3 1811-7465 2071-0437 https://doaj.org/article/ee49cba019e84fb3832e1254ce9ec715 Вестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии, Iss 3(62), Pp 26-35 (2023) archeology of stateless societies frontier bronze age southern urals sintashta paleo-dna chronology Archaeology CC1-960 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2023-62-3-3 2023-09-17T00:38:44Z The practice of archaeological research often illustrates situations where the sum of facts does not correspond to the cultural-historical approach; it is impossible to squeeze this sum into the framework of the term “archaeological culture”. Deviations from his canonical understanding of the term may relate to the duration of the phenomenon, its spatial distribution or the degree of stereotyping of material culture and rituals. The frontier can be one of the options for interpreting such non-standard groups of archaeological objects. The purpose of the study is to test the possibilities of using the concept for the interpretation of the Sintashta sites of the Bronze Age of the Southern Urals (the turn of 3rd — 2nd millennium cal BC) in the light of new data from a comprehensive study (paleogenetics, chronology, etc.). Sintashta settlements and cemeteries are located on the compact territory of the northern steppe: settlements in the Trans-Urals, the burial ground — on both sides of the Ural Mountains. Previous studies have accumulated a huge amount of data on all major aspects, but the general concept remains debatable. The new data comes from mass radiocarbon dating, which allowed to use Bayesian modeling. New data of mass radiocarbon dating confirm the brevity of the functioning of the Sintashta settlements and burial grounds, as well as the possibility of partial synchronization of this tradition with others. Paleogenetic analyzes (more than 50 samples) have shown the heterogeneity of the Sintashta population. Peleogenetic data made it possible to diagnose traces of a subtratian population absorbed by the main migratory group. In material culture, The evidences in material culture are not traced. The same data confirmed a special scenario for the formation of necropolises, weakly associated with the consanguinity of the buried individuals. Only 1/5 of the deceased turned out to be relatives of the first and second degree. The new data significantly complement the previously formulated criteria, which allow ... Article in Journal/Newspaper ural mountains Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII, ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII 3(62) 26 35
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language Russian
topic archeology of stateless societies
frontier
bronze age
southern urals
sintashta
paleo-dna
chronology
Archaeology
CC1-960
spellingShingle archeology of stateless societies
frontier
bronze age
southern urals
sintashta
paleo-dna
chronology
Archaeology
CC1-960
Epimakhov A.V.
Pro et contra of frontier interpretation of Sintashta antiquities (Bronze Age in the Southern Urals)
topic_facet archeology of stateless societies
frontier
bronze age
southern urals
sintashta
paleo-dna
chronology
Archaeology
CC1-960
description The practice of archaeological research often illustrates situations where the sum of facts does not correspond to the cultural-historical approach; it is impossible to squeeze this sum into the framework of the term “archaeological culture”. Deviations from his canonical understanding of the term may relate to the duration of the phenomenon, its spatial distribution or the degree of stereotyping of material culture and rituals. The frontier can be one of the options for interpreting such non-standard groups of archaeological objects. The purpose of the study is to test the possibilities of using the concept for the interpretation of the Sintashta sites of the Bronze Age of the Southern Urals (the turn of 3rd — 2nd millennium cal BC) in the light of new data from a comprehensive study (paleogenetics, chronology, etc.). Sintashta settlements and cemeteries are located on the compact territory of the northern steppe: settlements in the Trans-Urals, the burial ground — on both sides of the Ural Mountains. Previous studies have accumulated a huge amount of data on all major aspects, but the general concept remains debatable. The new data comes from mass radiocarbon dating, which allowed to use Bayesian modeling. New data of mass radiocarbon dating confirm the brevity of the functioning of the Sintashta settlements and burial grounds, as well as the possibility of partial synchronization of this tradition with others. Paleogenetic analyzes (more than 50 samples) have shown the heterogeneity of the Sintashta population. Peleogenetic data made it possible to diagnose traces of a subtratian population absorbed by the main migratory group. In material culture, The evidences in material culture are not traced. The same data confirmed a special scenario for the formation of necropolises, weakly associated with the consanguinity of the buried individuals. Only 1/5 of the deceased turned out to be relatives of the first and second degree. The new data significantly complement the previously formulated criteria, which allow ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Epimakhov A.V.
author_facet Epimakhov A.V.
author_sort Epimakhov A.V.
title Pro et contra of frontier interpretation of Sintashta antiquities (Bronze Age in the Southern Urals)
title_short Pro et contra of frontier interpretation of Sintashta antiquities (Bronze Age in the Southern Urals)
title_full Pro et contra of frontier interpretation of Sintashta antiquities (Bronze Age in the Southern Urals)
title_fullStr Pro et contra of frontier interpretation of Sintashta antiquities (Bronze Age in the Southern Urals)
title_full_unstemmed Pro et contra of frontier interpretation of Sintashta antiquities (Bronze Age in the Southern Urals)
title_sort pro et contra of frontier interpretation of sintashta antiquities (bronze age in the southern urals)
publisher Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RA
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2023-62-3-3
https://doaj.org/article/ee49cba019e84fb3832e1254ce9ec715
genre ural mountains
genre_facet ural mountains
op_source Вестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии, Iss 3(62), Pp 26-35 (2023)
op_relation http://ipdn.ru/_private/a62/26-35.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1811-7465
https://doaj.org/toc/2071-0437
doi:10.20874/2071-0437-2023-62-3-3
1811-7465
2071-0437
https://doaj.org/article/ee49cba019e84fb3832e1254ce9ec715
op_doi https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2023-62-3-3
container_title VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII, ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII
container_issue 3(62)
container_start_page 26
op_container_end_page 35
_version_ 1779321037403455488