Evaluation of Arctic cloud products from the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility based on CALIPSO-CALIOP observations

The performance of the three cloud products cloud fractional cover, cloud type and cloud top height, derived from NOAA AVHRR data and produced by the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility, has been evaluated in detail over the Arctic region for four months in 2007 using CALIPSO-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K.-G. Karlsson, A. Dybbroe
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/ee425c58036b4ee4b1592ceffb54da19
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ee425c58036b4ee4b1592ceffb54da19
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ee425c58036b4ee4b1592ceffb54da19 2023-05-15T14:57:44+02:00 Evaluation of Arctic cloud products from the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility based on CALIPSO-CALIOP observations K.-G. Karlsson A. Dybbroe 2010-02-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/ee425c58036b4ee4b1592ceffb54da19 EN eng Copernicus Publications http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/1789/2010/acp-10-1789-2010.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7316 https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7324 1680-7316 1680-7324 https://doaj.org/article/ee425c58036b4ee4b1592ceffb54da19 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 10, Iss 4, Pp 1789-1807 (2010) Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 article 2010 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-31T13:12:19Z The performance of the three cloud products cloud fractional cover, cloud type and cloud top height, derived from NOAA AVHRR data and produced by the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility, has been evaluated in detail over the Arctic region for four months in 2007 using CALIPSO-CALIOP observations. The evaluation was based on 142 selected NOAA/Metop overpasses allowing almost 400 000 individual matchups between AVHRR pixels and CALIOP measurements distributed approximately equally over the studied months (June, July, August and December 2007). Results suggest that estimations of cloud amounts are very accurate during the polar summer season while a substantial loss of detected clouds occurs in the polar winter. Evaluation results for cloud type and cloud top products point at specific problems related to the existence of near isothermal conditions in the lower troposphere in the polar summer and the use of reference vertical temperature profiles from Numerical Weather Prediction model analyses. The latter are currently not detailed enough in describing true conditions relevant on the pixel scale. This concerns especially the description of near-surface temperature inversions which are often too weak leading to large errors in interpreted cloud top heights. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
K.-G. Karlsson
A. Dybbroe
Evaluation of Arctic cloud products from the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility based on CALIPSO-CALIOP observations
topic_facet Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
description The performance of the three cloud products cloud fractional cover, cloud type and cloud top height, derived from NOAA AVHRR data and produced by the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility, has been evaluated in detail over the Arctic region for four months in 2007 using CALIPSO-CALIOP observations. The evaluation was based on 142 selected NOAA/Metop overpasses allowing almost 400 000 individual matchups between AVHRR pixels and CALIOP measurements distributed approximately equally over the studied months (June, July, August and December 2007). Results suggest that estimations of cloud amounts are very accurate during the polar summer season while a substantial loss of detected clouds occurs in the polar winter. Evaluation results for cloud type and cloud top products point at specific problems related to the existence of near isothermal conditions in the lower troposphere in the polar summer and the use of reference vertical temperature profiles from Numerical Weather Prediction model analyses. The latter are currently not detailed enough in describing true conditions relevant on the pixel scale. This concerns especially the description of near-surface temperature inversions which are often too weak leading to large errors in interpreted cloud top heights.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author K.-G. Karlsson
A. Dybbroe
author_facet K.-G. Karlsson
A. Dybbroe
author_sort K.-G. Karlsson
title Evaluation of Arctic cloud products from the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility based on CALIPSO-CALIOP observations
title_short Evaluation of Arctic cloud products from the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility based on CALIPSO-CALIOP observations
title_full Evaluation of Arctic cloud products from the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility based on CALIPSO-CALIOP observations
title_fullStr Evaluation of Arctic cloud products from the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility based on CALIPSO-CALIOP observations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Arctic cloud products from the EUMETSAT Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility based on CALIPSO-CALIOP observations
title_sort evaluation of arctic cloud products from the eumetsat climate monitoring satellite application facility based on calipso-caliop observations
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/ee425c58036b4ee4b1592ceffb54da19
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 10, Iss 4, Pp 1789-1807 (2010)
op_relation http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/1789/2010/acp-10-1789-2010.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7316
https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7324
1680-7316
1680-7324
https://doaj.org/article/ee425c58036b4ee4b1592ceffb54da19
_version_ 1766329864834514944