Observations on non-possessive usages of personal markers (possessive suffixes) in Nganasan

This paper aims at a systematic overview of the non-possessive usages of possessive (relational) suffixes in Nganasan. In the analyzed corpus, the non-anchoring usage types of the 3rd person suffix (including the direct anaphoric and situational usages), are less frequent than relational usages. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics
Main Author: Réka Zayzon
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Estonian
Published: University of Tartu Press 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2015.6.2.11
https://doaj.org/article/ed5954b14607461e930774ed0329c12a
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ed5954b14607461e930774ed0329c12a
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ed5954b14607461e930774ed0329c12a 2023-05-15T17:23:39+02:00 Observations on non-possessive usages of personal markers (possessive suffixes) in Nganasan Réka Zayzon 2015-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2015.6.2.11 https://doaj.org/article/ed5954b14607461e930774ed0329c12a EN ET eng est University of Tartu Press https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/15193 https://doaj.org/toc/1736-8987 https://doaj.org/toc/2228-1339 doi:10.12697/jeful.2015.6.2.11 1736-8987 2228-1339 https://doaj.org/article/ed5954b14607461e930774ed0329c12a Eesti ja Soome-ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri, Vol 6, Iss 2 (2015) Nganasan possessive suffixes definiteness possession epistemic grounding Philology. Linguistics P1-1091 Finnic. Baltic-Finnic PH91-98.5 article 2015 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2015.6.2.11 2022-12-30T22:58:32Z This paper aims at a systematic overview of the non-possessive usages of possessive (relational) suffixes in Nganasan. In the analyzed corpus, the non-anchoring usage types of the 3rd person suffix (including the direct anaphoric and situational usages), are less frequent than relational usages. The distribution of the suffixes suggests that in traditional narratives, the primary topic of the discourse tends to be marked with a deictic (2nd person) and the secondary topic with an anaphoric (3rd person) suffix. The language data also show that in Nganasan, the concept of semantic uniqueness does not suffice to explain the occurrence of the 3rd person suffix as definiteness marker, the topical status of the referent being decisive. Furthermore, predicting the (possessive vs. non-possessive) reading of the relational suffix solely by the conceptual type of the host noun is in case of some lexemes impossible and therefore, contextual information gains crucial importance. Article in Journal/Newspaper Nganasan* Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 6 2 259 278
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Estonian
topic Nganasan
possessive suffixes
definiteness
possession
epistemic grounding
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Finnic. Baltic-Finnic
PH91-98.5
spellingShingle Nganasan
possessive suffixes
definiteness
possession
epistemic grounding
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Finnic. Baltic-Finnic
PH91-98.5
Réka Zayzon
Observations on non-possessive usages of personal markers (possessive suffixes) in Nganasan
topic_facet Nganasan
possessive suffixes
definiteness
possession
epistemic grounding
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Finnic. Baltic-Finnic
PH91-98.5
description This paper aims at a systematic overview of the non-possessive usages of possessive (relational) suffixes in Nganasan. In the analyzed corpus, the non-anchoring usage types of the 3rd person suffix (including the direct anaphoric and situational usages), are less frequent than relational usages. The distribution of the suffixes suggests that in traditional narratives, the primary topic of the discourse tends to be marked with a deictic (2nd person) and the secondary topic with an anaphoric (3rd person) suffix. The language data also show that in Nganasan, the concept of semantic uniqueness does not suffice to explain the occurrence of the 3rd person suffix as definiteness marker, the topical status of the referent being decisive. Furthermore, predicting the (possessive vs. non-possessive) reading of the relational suffix solely by the conceptual type of the host noun is in case of some lexemes impossible and therefore, contextual information gains crucial importance.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Réka Zayzon
author_facet Réka Zayzon
author_sort Réka Zayzon
title Observations on non-possessive usages of personal markers (possessive suffixes) in Nganasan
title_short Observations on non-possessive usages of personal markers (possessive suffixes) in Nganasan
title_full Observations on non-possessive usages of personal markers (possessive suffixes) in Nganasan
title_fullStr Observations on non-possessive usages of personal markers (possessive suffixes) in Nganasan
title_full_unstemmed Observations on non-possessive usages of personal markers (possessive suffixes) in Nganasan
title_sort observations on non-possessive usages of personal markers (possessive suffixes) in nganasan
publisher University of Tartu Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2015.6.2.11
https://doaj.org/article/ed5954b14607461e930774ed0329c12a
genre Nganasan*
genre_facet Nganasan*
op_source Eesti ja Soome-ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri, Vol 6, Iss 2 (2015)
op_relation https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/15193
https://doaj.org/toc/1736-8987
https://doaj.org/toc/2228-1339
doi:10.12697/jeful.2015.6.2.11
1736-8987
2228-1339
https://doaj.org/article/ed5954b14607461e930774ed0329c12a
op_doi https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2015.6.2.11
container_title Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics
container_volume 6
container_issue 2
container_start_page 259
op_container_end_page 278
_version_ 1766113903103705088