Malaria Panel Assay versus PCR: detection of naturally infected Anopheles melas in a coastal village of Equatorial Guinea

Abstract Background A study was carried out in a village of the mainland region of Equatorial Guinea in order to ascertain a) which members of Anopheles gambiae complex could be involved in malaria transmission and b) the rate of infectivity for Anopheles melas comparing two different methods, a PCR...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Malaria Journal
Main Authors: Micha Francisco, Ondo Melchor, Buatiche Jesús N, Bobuakasi Leonardo, Nzambo Sisinio, Cano Jorge, Moreno Marta, Benito Agustín
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-3-20
https://doaj.org/article/eb94c41106a846fa94449da30578e530
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:eb94c41106a846fa94449da30578e530
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:eb94c41106a846fa94449da30578e530 2023-05-15T15:17:07+02:00 Malaria Panel Assay versus PCR: detection of naturally infected Anopheles melas in a coastal village of Equatorial Guinea Micha Francisco Ondo Melchor Buatiche Jesús N Bobuakasi Leonardo Nzambo Sisinio Cano Jorge Moreno Marta Benito Agustín 2004-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-3-20 https://doaj.org/article/eb94c41106a846fa94449da30578e530 EN eng BMC http://www.malariajournal.com/content/3/1/20 https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-3-20 1475-2875 https://doaj.org/article/eb94c41106a846fa94449da30578e530 Malaria Journal, Vol 3, Iss 1, p 20 (2004) Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 article 2004 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-3-20 2022-12-31T13:13:47Z Abstract Background A study was carried out in a village of the mainland region of Equatorial Guinea in order to ascertain a) which members of Anopheles gambiae complex could be involved in malaria transmission and b) the rate of infectivity for Anopheles melas comparing two different methods, a PCR able to detect sporozoite-DNA and an immunochromatographic assay MPR (Malaria Rapid Dipstick Panel Assay). Methods Mosquitoes were sampled at night by indoor captures in two houses of a coastal village in Equatorial Guinea (Ayantang). Collected mosquitoes were identified as An. gambiae s.l. These were individually dried into silica-gel. The head-thorax of the An. gambiae s.l . mosquitoes were analysed by PCR to verify that the species was of the gambiae complex. Individual head-thorax and pools (5 pools) of homogenized mosquitoes employed in Malaria Rapid Panel assay (MRP assay) were lysed and DNA was extracted. PCR was designed from the 753 base pair insert of pBRKl-14 and DNA was amplified. The relationship between dipstick and PCR to detect Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites was measured in terms of sensitivity, specificity and test association (Cohen's kappa value). Results Two hundred and sixty-four An. gambiae s.l . females were studied (214 individually and five pools with 10 mosquitoes in each). PCR analysis showed that 207 mosquitoes were An. melas , 3 An. gambiae s.s . and 4 could not be identified. By using PCR as the gold standard method when dipstick assay was compared, matching results were obtained for 6 mosquitoes and, in one case MRP was positive while PCR was not reactive. MRP assay showed a low sensitivity (3.3%) when compared with falciparum -DNA detection (17,7% and 14,3%, series A and B respectively). Agreement between the two test formats was low (κ = 0,224). Conclusion It was determined that An. melas is the main anopheline vector involved in malaria transmission in Ayantang, a coastal village in mainland Equatorial Guinea. A comparison of PCR and Vec-Test Assay ® , concluded that the PCR ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Malaria Journal 3 1 20
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Micha Francisco
Ondo Melchor
Buatiche Jesús N
Bobuakasi Leonardo
Nzambo Sisinio
Cano Jorge
Moreno Marta
Benito Agustín
Malaria Panel Assay versus PCR: detection of naturally infected Anopheles melas in a coastal village of Equatorial Guinea
topic_facet Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
description Abstract Background A study was carried out in a village of the mainland region of Equatorial Guinea in order to ascertain a) which members of Anopheles gambiae complex could be involved in malaria transmission and b) the rate of infectivity for Anopheles melas comparing two different methods, a PCR able to detect sporozoite-DNA and an immunochromatographic assay MPR (Malaria Rapid Dipstick Panel Assay). Methods Mosquitoes were sampled at night by indoor captures in two houses of a coastal village in Equatorial Guinea (Ayantang). Collected mosquitoes were identified as An. gambiae s.l. These were individually dried into silica-gel. The head-thorax of the An. gambiae s.l . mosquitoes were analysed by PCR to verify that the species was of the gambiae complex. Individual head-thorax and pools (5 pools) of homogenized mosquitoes employed in Malaria Rapid Panel assay (MRP assay) were lysed and DNA was extracted. PCR was designed from the 753 base pair insert of pBRKl-14 and DNA was amplified. The relationship between dipstick and PCR to detect Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites was measured in terms of sensitivity, specificity and test association (Cohen's kappa value). Results Two hundred and sixty-four An. gambiae s.l . females were studied (214 individually and five pools with 10 mosquitoes in each). PCR analysis showed that 207 mosquitoes were An. melas , 3 An. gambiae s.s . and 4 could not be identified. By using PCR as the gold standard method when dipstick assay was compared, matching results were obtained for 6 mosquitoes and, in one case MRP was positive while PCR was not reactive. MRP assay showed a low sensitivity (3.3%) when compared with falciparum -DNA detection (17,7% and 14,3%, series A and B respectively). Agreement between the two test formats was low (κ = 0,224). Conclusion It was determined that An. melas is the main anopheline vector involved in malaria transmission in Ayantang, a coastal village in mainland Equatorial Guinea. A comparison of PCR and Vec-Test Assay ® , concluded that the PCR ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Micha Francisco
Ondo Melchor
Buatiche Jesús N
Bobuakasi Leonardo
Nzambo Sisinio
Cano Jorge
Moreno Marta
Benito Agustín
author_facet Micha Francisco
Ondo Melchor
Buatiche Jesús N
Bobuakasi Leonardo
Nzambo Sisinio
Cano Jorge
Moreno Marta
Benito Agustín
author_sort Micha Francisco
title Malaria Panel Assay versus PCR: detection of naturally infected Anopheles melas in a coastal village of Equatorial Guinea
title_short Malaria Panel Assay versus PCR: detection of naturally infected Anopheles melas in a coastal village of Equatorial Guinea
title_full Malaria Panel Assay versus PCR: detection of naturally infected Anopheles melas in a coastal village of Equatorial Guinea
title_fullStr Malaria Panel Assay versus PCR: detection of naturally infected Anopheles melas in a coastal village of Equatorial Guinea
title_full_unstemmed Malaria Panel Assay versus PCR: detection of naturally infected Anopheles melas in a coastal village of Equatorial Guinea
title_sort malaria panel assay versus pcr: detection of naturally infected anopheles melas in a coastal village of equatorial guinea
publisher BMC
publishDate 2004
url https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-3-20
https://doaj.org/article/eb94c41106a846fa94449da30578e530
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Malaria Journal, Vol 3, Iss 1, p 20 (2004)
op_relation http://www.malariajournal.com/content/3/1/20
https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875
doi:10.1186/1475-2875-3-20
1475-2875
https://doaj.org/article/eb94c41106a846fa94449da30578e530
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-3-20
container_title Malaria Journal
container_volume 3
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
_version_ 1766347389262626816