Flawed Emergency Intervention: Slow Ocean Response to Abrupt Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

Abstract Given the possibility of irreversible, anthropogenic changes in the climate system, technologies such as solar radiation management (SRM) are sometimes framed as possible emergency interventions. However, little knowledge exists on the efficacy of such deployments. To fill in this gap, we p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Daniel Pflüger, Claudia E. Wieners, Leo vanKampenhout, René R. Wijngaard, Henk A. Dijkstra
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106132
https://doaj.org/article/eaa3b0b7824449b897b8beea5e2ff20b
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:eaa3b0b7824449b897b8beea5e2ff20b
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:eaa3b0b7824449b897b8beea5e2ff20b 2024-09-15T18:23:18+00:00 Flawed Emergency Intervention: Slow Ocean Response to Abrupt Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Daniel Pflüger Claudia E. Wieners Leo vanKampenhout René R. Wijngaard Henk A. Dijkstra 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106132 https://doaj.org/article/eaa3b0b7824449b897b8beea5e2ff20b EN eng Wiley https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106132 https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276 https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007 1944-8007 0094-8276 doi:10.1029/2023GL106132 https://doaj.org/article/eaa3b0b7824449b897b8beea5e2ff20b Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 51, Iss 5, Pp n/a-n/a (2024) stratospheric aerosol injection Atlantic meridional overturning circulation ocean heat content subpolar gyre deep convection tipping points Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106132 2024-08-05T17:49:23Z Abstract Given the possibility of irreversible, anthropogenic changes in the climate system, technologies such as solar radiation management (SRM) are sometimes framed as possible emergency interventions. However, little knowledge exists on the efficacy of such deployments. To fill in this gap, we perform Community Earth System Model 2 simulations of an intense warming scenario on which we impose gradual early‐century SRM or rapid late‐century cooling (an emergency intervention), both realized via stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI). While both scenarios cool Earth's surface, ocean responses differ drastically. Rapid cooling fails to release deep ocean heat content or restore an ailing North Atlantic deep convection but partially stabilizes the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. In contrast, the early intervention effectively mitigates changes in all of these features. Our results suggest that slow ocean timescales impair the efficacy of some SAI emergency interventions. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Geophysical Research Letters 51 5
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic stratospheric aerosol injection
Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
ocean heat content
subpolar gyre
deep convection
tipping points
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
spellingShingle stratospheric aerosol injection
Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
ocean heat content
subpolar gyre
deep convection
tipping points
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
Daniel Pflüger
Claudia E. Wieners
Leo vanKampenhout
René R. Wijngaard
Henk A. Dijkstra
Flawed Emergency Intervention: Slow Ocean Response to Abrupt Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
topic_facet stratospheric aerosol injection
Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
ocean heat content
subpolar gyre
deep convection
tipping points
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
description Abstract Given the possibility of irreversible, anthropogenic changes in the climate system, technologies such as solar radiation management (SRM) are sometimes framed as possible emergency interventions. However, little knowledge exists on the efficacy of such deployments. To fill in this gap, we perform Community Earth System Model 2 simulations of an intense warming scenario on which we impose gradual early‐century SRM or rapid late‐century cooling (an emergency intervention), both realized via stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI). While both scenarios cool Earth's surface, ocean responses differ drastically. Rapid cooling fails to release deep ocean heat content or restore an ailing North Atlantic deep convection but partially stabilizes the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. In contrast, the early intervention effectively mitigates changes in all of these features. Our results suggest that slow ocean timescales impair the efficacy of some SAI emergency interventions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Daniel Pflüger
Claudia E. Wieners
Leo vanKampenhout
René R. Wijngaard
Henk A. Dijkstra
author_facet Daniel Pflüger
Claudia E. Wieners
Leo vanKampenhout
René R. Wijngaard
Henk A. Dijkstra
author_sort Daniel Pflüger
title Flawed Emergency Intervention: Slow Ocean Response to Abrupt Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
title_short Flawed Emergency Intervention: Slow Ocean Response to Abrupt Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
title_full Flawed Emergency Intervention: Slow Ocean Response to Abrupt Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
title_fullStr Flawed Emergency Intervention: Slow Ocean Response to Abrupt Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
title_full_unstemmed Flawed Emergency Intervention: Slow Ocean Response to Abrupt Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
title_sort flawed emergency intervention: slow ocean response to abrupt stratospheric aerosol injection
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106132
https://doaj.org/article/eaa3b0b7824449b897b8beea5e2ff20b
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 51, Iss 5, Pp n/a-n/a (2024)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106132
https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276
https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007
1944-8007
0094-8276
doi:10.1029/2023GL106132
https://doaj.org/article/eaa3b0b7824449b897b8beea5e2ff20b
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106132
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 51
container_issue 5
_version_ 1810463481527271424