Does the analysed size fraction of benthic foraminifera influence the ecological quality status and the interpretation of environmental conditions? Indications from two northern Norwegian fjords

The introduction of the European Water Framework Directive has increased the interest in benthic foraminifera as a biomonitoring tool. This prompted the need to standardise the methods used to analyse benthic foraminifera, including which sediment fraction to analyse. In some regions benthic foramin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological Indicators
Main Authors: Anouk T. Klootwijk, Elisabeth Alve
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108423
https://doaj.org/article/e9976e7397f545aea8430675913a5c6e
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e9976e7397f545aea8430675913a5c6e
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e9976e7397f545aea8430675913a5c6e 2023-05-15T15:12:23+02:00 Does the analysed size fraction of benthic foraminifera influence the ecological quality status and the interpretation of environmental conditions? Indications from two northern Norwegian fjords Anouk T. Klootwijk Elisabeth Alve 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108423 https://doaj.org/article/e9976e7397f545aea8430675913a5c6e EN eng Elsevier http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21010888 https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X 1470-160X doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108423 https://doaj.org/article/e9976e7397f545aea8430675913a5c6e Ecological Indicators, Vol 135, Iss , Pp 108423- (2022) Ecological quality status (EcoQS) Benthic foraminiferal biomonitoring Foraminiferal test size Diversity indices Sub-arctic region Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108423 2022-12-30T20:17:55Z The introduction of the European Water Framework Directive has increased the interest in benthic foraminifera as a biomonitoring tool. This prompted the need to standardise the methods used to analyse benthic foraminifera, including which sediment fraction to analyse. In some regions benthic foraminifera produce small (< 125 µm) adult tests, and the current study assessed the effect of analysing the > 63 µm or > 125 µm fraction on determining the Ecological Quality Status (EcoQS) in two fjords in northern Norway. The diversity indices Shannon-Wiener index (H’log2) and Hurlbert’s rarefaction index (ES100), and the multi-metric Norwegian Quality Index (NQI), from both the > 63 µm and > 125 µm fraction resulted in the same or similar EcoQS, reflecting good environmental conditions in both fjords. The same applied to the AZTI’s Marine Biological Index (AMBI), except at one location which had moderate EcoQS. At this location especially, more foraminifera with a tolerant or opportunistic response to organic matter enrichment occurred in the > 63 µm fraction than in the > 125 µm fraction. Hence, the higher H’log2 and ES100 of the > 63 µm fraction can be somewhat misleading as it indicates better environmental conditions, whereas the AMBI indicates more organic matter input. The Stainforthia group and Epistominella vitrea, indicating organic matter enrichment and increased primary productivity were, however, mostly absent in the > 125 µm fraction. Their absence in this fraction could have consequences for monitoring potential anthropogenic pressure factors and identifying long-term changes in environmental conditions when using this fraction. This study suggests the > 125 µm would be mostly sufficient for determining the EcoQS in northern Norway. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Foraminifera* Northern Norway Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Norway Ecological Indicators 135 108423
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Ecological quality status (EcoQS)
Benthic foraminiferal biomonitoring
Foraminiferal test size
Diversity indices
Sub-arctic region
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Ecological quality status (EcoQS)
Benthic foraminiferal biomonitoring
Foraminiferal test size
Diversity indices
Sub-arctic region
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Anouk T. Klootwijk
Elisabeth Alve
Does the analysed size fraction of benthic foraminifera influence the ecological quality status and the interpretation of environmental conditions? Indications from two northern Norwegian fjords
topic_facet Ecological quality status (EcoQS)
Benthic foraminiferal biomonitoring
Foraminiferal test size
Diversity indices
Sub-arctic region
Ecology
QH540-549.5
description The introduction of the European Water Framework Directive has increased the interest in benthic foraminifera as a biomonitoring tool. This prompted the need to standardise the methods used to analyse benthic foraminifera, including which sediment fraction to analyse. In some regions benthic foraminifera produce small (< 125 µm) adult tests, and the current study assessed the effect of analysing the > 63 µm or > 125 µm fraction on determining the Ecological Quality Status (EcoQS) in two fjords in northern Norway. The diversity indices Shannon-Wiener index (H’log2) and Hurlbert’s rarefaction index (ES100), and the multi-metric Norwegian Quality Index (NQI), from both the > 63 µm and > 125 µm fraction resulted in the same or similar EcoQS, reflecting good environmental conditions in both fjords. The same applied to the AZTI’s Marine Biological Index (AMBI), except at one location which had moderate EcoQS. At this location especially, more foraminifera with a tolerant or opportunistic response to organic matter enrichment occurred in the > 63 µm fraction than in the > 125 µm fraction. Hence, the higher H’log2 and ES100 of the > 63 µm fraction can be somewhat misleading as it indicates better environmental conditions, whereas the AMBI indicates more organic matter input. The Stainforthia group and Epistominella vitrea, indicating organic matter enrichment and increased primary productivity were, however, mostly absent in the > 125 µm fraction. Their absence in this fraction could have consequences for monitoring potential anthropogenic pressure factors and identifying long-term changes in environmental conditions when using this fraction. This study suggests the > 125 µm would be mostly sufficient for determining the EcoQS in northern Norway.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Anouk T. Klootwijk
Elisabeth Alve
author_facet Anouk T. Klootwijk
Elisabeth Alve
author_sort Anouk T. Klootwijk
title Does the analysed size fraction of benthic foraminifera influence the ecological quality status and the interpretation of environmental conditions? Indications from two northern Norwegian fjords
title_short Does the analysed size fraction of benthic foraminifera influence the ecological quality status and the interpretation of environmental conditions? Indications from two northern Norwegian fjords
title_full Does the analysed size fraction of benthic foraminifera influence the ecological quality status and the interpretation of environmental conditions? Indications from two northern Norwegian fjords
title_fullStr Does the analysed size fraction of benthic foraminifera influence the ecological quality status and the interpretation of environmental conditions? Indications from two northern Norwegian fjords
title_full_unstemmed Does the analysed size fraction of benthic foraminifera influence the ecological quality status and the interpretation of environmental conditions? Indications from two northern Norwegian fjords
title_sort does the analysed size fraction of benthic foraminifera influence the ecological quality status and the interpretation of environmental conditions? indications from two northern norwegian fjords
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108423
https://doaj.org/article/e9976e7397f545aea8430675913a5c6e
geographic Arctic
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Norway
genre Arctic
Foraminifera*
Northern Norway
genre_facet Arctic
Foraminifera*
Northern Norway
op_source Ecological Indicators, Vol 135, Iss , Pp 108423- (2022)
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21010888
https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X
1470-160X
doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108423
https://doaj.org/article/e9976e7397f545aea8430675913a5c6e
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108423
container_title Ecological Indicators
container_volume 135
container_start_page 108423
_version_ 1766343071502434304