Subseasonal Prediction of Regional Antarctic Sea Ice by a Deep Learning Model

Abstract Antarctic sea ice concentration (SIC) prediction at seasonal scale has been documented, but a gap remains at subseasonal scale (1–8 weeks) due to limited understanding of ice‐related physical mechanisms. To overcome this limitation, we developed a deep learning model named Sea Ice Predictio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Yunhe Wang, Xiaojun Yuan, Yibin Ren, Mitchell Bushuk, Qi Shu, Cuihua Li, Xiaofeng Li
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104347
https://doaj.org/article/e7f78b85b7834e6e825fde8d702ef1f4
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e7f78b85b7834e6e825fde8d702ef1f4
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e7f78b85b7834e6e825fde8d702ef1f4 2024-09-15T17:48:11+00:00 Subseasonal Prediction of Regional Antarctic Sea Ice by a Deep Learning Model Yunhe Wang Xiaojun Yuan Yibin Ren Mitchell Bushuk Qi Shu Cuihua Li Xiaofeng Li 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104347 https://doaj.org/article/e7f78b85b7834e6e825fde8d702ef1f4 EN eng Wiley https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104347 https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276 https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007 1944-8007 0094-8276 doi:10.1029/2023GL104347 https://doaj.org/article/e7f78b85b7834e6e825fde8d702ef1f4 Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 50, Iss 17, Pp n/a-n/a (2023) Antarctic sea ice prediction Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104347 2024-08-05T17:49:23Z Abstract Antarctic sea ice concentration (SIC) prediction at seasonal scale has been documented, but a gap remains at subseasonal scale (1–8 weeks) due to limited understanding of ice‐related physical mechanisms. To overcome this limitation, we developed a deep learning model named Sea Ice Prediction Network (SIPNet) that can predict SIC without the need to account for complex physical processes. Compared to mainstream dynamical models like European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, and Seamless System for Prediction and Earth System Research developed at Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, as well as a relatively advanced statistical model like the linear Markov model, SIPNet outperforms them all, effectively filling the gap in subseasonal Antarctic SIC prediction capability. SIPNet results indicate that autumn SIC variability contributes the most to sea ice predictability, whereas spring contributes the least. In addition, the Weddell Sea displays the highest sea ice predictability, while predictability is low in the West Pacific. SIPNet can also capture the signal of ENSO and SAM on sea ice. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Sea ice Weddell Sea Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Geophysical Research Letters 50 17
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Antarctic
sea ice prediction
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
spellingShingle Antarctic
sea ice prediction
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
Yunhe Wang
Xiaojun Yuan
Yibin Ren
Mitchell Bushuk
Qi Shu
Cuihua Li
Xiaofeng Li
Subseasonal Prediction of Regional Antarctic Sea Ice by a Deep Learning Model
topic_facet Antarctic
sea ice prediction
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
description Abstract Antarctic sea ice concentration (SIC) prediction at seasonal scale has been documented, but a gap remains at subseasonal scale (1–8 weeks) due to limited understanding of ice‐related physical mechanisms. To overcome this limitation, we developed a deep learning model named Sea Ice Prediction Network (SIPNet) that can predict SIC without the need to account for complex physical processes. Compared to mainstream dynamical models like European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, and Seamless System for Prediction and Earth System Research developed at Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, as well as a relatively advanced statistical model like the linear Markov model, SIPNet outperforms them all, effectively filling the gap in subseasonal Antarctic SIC prediction capability. SIPNet results indicate that autumn SIC variability contributes the most to sea ice predictability, whereas spring contributes the least. In addition, the Weddell Sea displays the highest sea ice predictability, while predictability is low in the West Pacific. SIPNet can also capture the signal of ENSO and SAM on sea ice.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Yunhe Wang
Xiaojun Yuan
Yibin Ren
Mitchell Bushuk
Qi Shu
Cuihua Li
Xiaofeng Li
author_facet Yunhe Wang
Xiaojun Yuan
Yibin Ren
Mitchell Bushuk
Qi Shu
Cuihua Li
Xiaofeng Li
author_sort Yunhe Wang
title Subseasonal Prediction of Regional Antarctic Sea Ice by a Deep Learning Model
title_short Subseasonal Prediction of Regional Antarctic Sea Ice by a Deep Learning Model
title_full Subseasonal Prediction of Regional Antarctic Sea Ice by a Deep Learning Model
title_fullStr Subseasonal Prediction of Regional Antarctic Sea Ice by a Deep Learning Model
title_full_unstemmed Subseasonal Prediction of Regional Antarctic Sea Ice by a Deep Learning Model
title_sort subseasonal prediction of regional antarctic sea ice by a deep learning model
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104347
https://doaj.org/article/e7f78b85b7834e6e825fde8d702ef1f4
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Sea ice
Weddell Sea
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Sea ice
Weddell Sea
op_source Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 50, Iss 17, Pp n/a-n/a (2023)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104347
https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276
https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007
1944-8007
0094-8276
doi:10.1029/2023GL104347
https://doaj.org/article/e7f78b85b7834e6e825fde8d702ef1f4
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104347
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 50
container_issue 17
_version_ 1810289328467738624