Implications for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions and Economics of a Changing Agricultural Mosaic in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta

doi: https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2017v15iss3art2 We quantified the greenhouse-gas (GHG) emission and economic implications of alternative crop and wetland mosaics on a Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta island: Staten Island. Using existing GHG fluxes measurements for the Delta and biogeochemical model...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven Deverel, Paul Jacobs, Christina Lucero, Sabina Dore, T. Rodd Kelsey
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/e7a3b56c8c1743bbaeee73e2829d7689
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e7a3b56c8c1743bbaeee73e2829d7689
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e7a3b56c8c1743bbaeee73e2829d7689 2023-05-15T16:00:31+02:00 Implications for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions and Economics of a Changing Agricultural Mosaic in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta Steven Deverel Paul Jacobs Christina Lucero Sabina Dore T. Rodd Kelsey 2017-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/e7a3b56c8c1743bbaeee73e2829d7689 EN eng eScholarship Publishing, University of California http://escholarship.org/uc/item/99z2z7hb https://doaj.org/toc/1546-2366 1546-2366 https://doaj.org/article/e7a3b56c8c1743bbaeee73e2829d7689 San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, Vol 15, Iss 3 (2017) greeenhouse-gas (GHG) emission Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta GHG emission reduction wetland rice carbon dioxide fluxes methane fluxes nitrous oxide fluxes carbon offset carbon cycle agricultural economics Environmental sciences GE1-350 article 2017 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-31T14:40:40Z doi: https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2017v15iss3art2 We quantified the greenhouse-gas (GHG) emission and economic implications of alternative crop and wetland mosaics on a Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta island: Staten Island. Using existing GHG fluxes measurements for the Delta and biogeochemical models, we estimated GHG emissions for a range of scenarios, including the status quo, modified groundwater management, and incorporating rice and managed wetlands. For current land uses, emissions were predicted to vary greatly (48,000 to 105,000 t CO 2 -e yr − 1 ) with varying groundwater depth. GHG emissions were highest when water depth was 120 cm, the typical depth for a Delta island, and lowest if water table depth was shallowest (60 cm). In the alternate land-use scenarios, we simulated wetlands and rice cultivation in areas of highest organic-matter soils, greatest subsidence, and GHG emissions. For each scenario, we analyzed economic implications for the land-owner by determining profit changes relative to the status quo. We spatially assigned areas for rice and wetlands, and then allowed the Delta Agricultural Production (DAP) model to optimize the allocation of other crops to maximize profit. The scenario that included wetlands decreased profits 79 % relative to the status quo but reduced GHG emissions by 43,000 t CO 2 -e yr − 1 (57 % reduction). When mixtures of rice and wetlands were introduced, farm profits decreased 16 % , and the GHG emission reduction was 33,000 t CO 2 -e yr − 1 (44 % reduction). When rice was cultivated on 38 % of the island, profit increased 12 % and emissions were 22,000 t CO 2 -e yr − 1 lower than baseline emissions (30 % reduction). Conversion to a mosaic of wetlands and crops including rice could substantially reduce overall GHG emissions of cultivated lands in the Delta without greatly affecting profitability. Article in Journal/Newspaper Delta Island Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic greeenhouse-gas (GHG) emission
Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
GHG emission reduction
wetland
rice
carbon dioxide fluxes
methane fluxes
nitrous oxide fluxes
carbon offset
carbon cycle
agricultural economics
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle greeenhouse-gas (GHG) emission
Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
GHG emission reduction
wetland
rice
carbon dioxide fluxes
methane fluxes
nitrous oxide fluxes
carbon offset
carbon cycle
agricultural economics
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Steven Deverel
Paul Jacobs
Christina Lucero
Sabina Dore
T. Rodd Kelsey
Implications for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions and Economics of a Changing Agricultural Mosaic in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
topic_facet greeenhouse-gas (GHG) emission
Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
GHG emission reduction
wetland
rice
carbon dioxide fluxes
methane fluxes
nitrous oxide fluxes
carbon offset
carbon cycle
agricultural economics
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
description doi: https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2017v15iss3art2 We quantified the greenhouse-gas (GHG) emission and economic implications of alternative crop and wetland mosaics on a Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta island: Staten Island. Using existing GHG fluxes measurements for the Delta and biogeochemical models, we estimated GHG emissions for a range of scenarios, including the status quo, modified groundwater management, and incorporating rice and managed wetlands. For current land uses, emissions were predicted to vary greatly (48,000 to 105,000 t CO 2 -e yr − 1 ) with varying groundwater depth. GHG emissions were highest when water depth was 120 cm, the typical depth for a Delta island, and lowest if water table depth was shallowest (60 cm). In the alternate land-use scenarios, we simulated wetlands and rice cultivation in areas of highest organic-matter soils, greatest subsidence, and GHG emissions. For each scenario, we analyzed economic implications for the land-owner by determining profit changes relative to the status quo. We spatially assigned areas for rice and wetlands, and then allowed the Delta Agricultural Production (DAP) model to optimize the allocation of other crops to maximize profit. The scenario that included wetlands decreased profits 79 % relative to the status quo but reduced GHG emissions by 43,000 t CO 2 -e yr − 1 (57 % reduction). When mixtures of rice and wetlands were introduced, farm profits decreased 16 % , and the GHG emission reduction was 33,000 t CO 2 -e yr − 1 (44 % reduction). When rice was cultivated on 38 % of the island, profit increased 12 % and emissions were 22,000 t CO 2 -e yr − 1 lower than baseline emissions (30 % reduction). Conversion to a mosaic of wetlands and crops including rice could substantially reduce overall GHG emissions of cultivated lands in the Delta without greatly affecting profitability.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Steven Deverel
Paul Jacobs
Christina Lucero
Sabina Dore
T. Rodd Kelsey
author_facet Steven Deverel
Paul Jacobs
Christina Lucero
Sabina Dore
T. Rodd Kelsey
author_sort Steven Deverel
title Implications for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions and Economics of a Changing Agricultural Mosaic in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
title_short Implications for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions and Economics of a Changing Agricultural Mosaic in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
title_full Implications for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions and Economics of a Changing Agricultural Mosaic in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
title_fullStr Implications for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions and Economics of a Changing Agricultural Mosaic in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
title_full_unstemmed Implications for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions and Economics of a Changing Agricultural Mosaic in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta
title_sort implications for greenhouse gas emission reductions and economics of a changing agricultural mosaic in the sacramento–san joaquin delta
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/e7a3b56c8c1743bbaeee73e2829d7689
genre Delta Island
genre_facet Delta Island
op_source San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, Vol 15, Iss 3 (2017)
op_relation http://escholarship.org/uc/item/99z2z7hb
https://doaj.org/toc/1546-2366
1546-2366
https://doaj.org/article/e7a3b56c8c1743bbaeee73e2829d7689
_version_ 1766396500120698880