The new sun-sky-lunar Cimel CE318-T multiband photometer – a comprehensive performance evaluation

• Published in: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
• Main Authors: Á. Barreto, E. Cuevas, M.-J. Granados-Muñoz, L. Alados-Arboledas, P. M. Romero, J. Gröbner, N. Kouremeti, A. F. Almansa, T. Stone, C. Toledano, R. Román, M. Sorokin, B. Holben, M. Canini, M. Yela
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2016
• Subjects: Environmental engineering; TA170-171; Earthwork. Foundations; TA715-787; Triplets; Aerosol Robotic Network
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-631-2016; https://doaj.org/article/e5fed04848d5460b9b0dc51ee52e4609

This paper presents the new photometer CE318-T, able to perform daytime and night-time photometric measurements using the sun and the moon as light source. Therefore, this new device permits a complete cycle of diurnal aerosol and water vapour measurements valuable to enhance atmospheric monitoring to be extracted. In this study we have found significantly higher precision of triplets when comparing the CE318-T master instrument and the Cimel AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) master (CE318-AERONET) triplets as a result of the new CE318-T tracking system. Regarding the instrument calibration, two new methodologies to transfer the calibration from a reference instrument using only daytime measurements (Sun Ratio and Sun-Moon gain factor techniques) are presented and discussed. These methods allow the reduction of the previous complexities inherent to nocturnal calibration. A quantitative estimation of CE318-T AOD uncertainty by means of error propagation theory during daytime revealed AOD uncertainties ( u D AOD ) for Langley-calibrated instruments similar to the expected values for other reference instruments (0.002–0.009). We have also found u D AOD values similar to the values reported in sun photometry for field instruments ( ∼ 0.015). In the case of the night-time period, the CE318-T-estimated standard combined uncertainty ( u N AOD ) is dependent not only on the calibration technique but also on illumination conditions and the instrumental noise. These values range from 0.011–0.018 for Lunar Langley-calibrated instruments to 0.012–0.021 for instruments calibrated using the Sun Ratio technique. In the case of moon-calibrated instruments using the Sun-Moon gain factor method and sun-calibrated using the Langley technique, we found u N AOD ranging from 0.016 to 0.017 (up to 0.019 in 440 nm channel), not dependent on any lunar irradiance model. A subsequent performance evaluation including CE318-T and collocated measurements from independent reference instruments has served to assess the CE318-T performance as ...