Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute

The distribution of legal authority to protect biodiversity in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) between the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the UN Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) has been a contentious issue. In practice, main responsibility has been allocated to LOSC,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Main Author: Christian Prip
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Norwegian
Published: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2022
Subjects:
Law
K
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v13.3635
https://doaj.org/article/e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674 2023-05-15T14:21:29+02:00 Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute Christian Prip 2022-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v13.3635 https://doaj.org/article/e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674 EN NO eng nor Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/3635/6387 https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562 2387-4562 doi:10.23865/arctic.v13.3635 https://doaj.org/article/e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674 Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 13, Iss 2022, Pp 171-190 (2022) ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (ebsas) convention on biological diversity (cbd) biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (bbnj) marine protected areas central arctic ocean Law K article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v13.3635 2022-12-31T03:53:58Z The distribution of legal authority to protect biodiversity in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) between the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the UN Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) has been a contentious issue. In practice, main responsibility has been allocated to LOSC, under which a new implementing agreement on conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ) is currently being negotiated. CBD was allocated responsibility for providing scientific information and advice on marine biodiversity, which has resulted in the identification and description of 321 Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) worldwide, within and beyond national jurisdiction. These could provide important scientific backing for a coming BBNJ instrument under LOSC, especially as regards the designation of marine protected areas and the conduct of environmental impact assessments in ABNJ. However, the process of modifying EBSAs and identifying new ones has recently been challenged by the CBD Conference of the Parties, harking back to previous disputes over the legal mandate and thereby threatening the entire mechanism that has been established. In the context of international environmental law and law of the sea, this article discusses the potential importance of EBSAs for the expected BBNJ instrument, using the Central Arctic Ocean EBSA as an example. Responsible Editor: Øyvind Ravna, Faculty of Law, UiT The Arctic University of Norway Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Ocean Arctic review on law and politics Law of the Sea Arctic University of Norway UiT The Arctic University of Norway Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Arctic Ocean Norway Arctic Review on Law and Politics 13 2022 171
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Norwegian
topic ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (ebsas)
convention on biological diversity (cbd)
biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (bbnj)
marine protected areas
central arctic ocean
Law
K
spellingShingle ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (ebsas)
convention on biological diversity (cbd)
biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (bbnj)
marine protected areas
central arctic ocean
Law
K
Christian Prip
Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute
topic_facet ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (ebsas)
convention on biological diversity (cbd)
biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (bbnj)
marine protected areas
central arctic ocean
Law
K
description The distribution of legal authority to protect biodiversity in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) between the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the UN Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) has been a contentious issue. In practice, main responsibility has been allocated to LOSC, under which a new implementing agreement on conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ) is currently being negotiated. CBD was allocated responsibility for providing scientific information and advice on marine biodiversity, which has resulted in the identification and description of 321 Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) worldwide, within and beyond national jurisdiction. These could provide important scientific backing for a coming BBNJ instrument under LOSC, especially as regards the designation of marine protected areas and the conduct of environmental impact assessments in ABNJ. However, the process of modifying EBSAs and identifying new ones has recently been challenged by the CBD Conference of the Parties, harking back to previous disputes over the legal mandate and thereby threatening the entire mechanism that has been established. In the context of international environmental law and law of the sea, this article discusses the potential importance of EBSAs for the expected BBNJ instrument, using the Central Arctic Ocean EBSA as an example. Responsible Editor: Øyvind Ravna, Faculty of Law, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Christian Prip
author_facet Christian Prip
author_sort Christian Prip
title Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute
title_short Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute
title_full Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute
title_fullStr Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute
title_full_unstemmed Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute
title_sort identifying and describing ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (ebsas): a key tool for the protection of ocean biodiversity in dispute
publisher Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v13.3635
https://doaj.org/article/e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Norway
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Arctic review on law and politics
Law of the Sea
Arctic University of Norway
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Arctic review on law and politics
Law of the Sea
Arctic University of Norway
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
op_source Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 13, Iss 2022, Pp 171-190 (2022)
op_relation https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/3635/6387
https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562
2387-4562
doi:10.23865/arctic.v13.3635
https://doaj.org/article/e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674
op_doi https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v13.3635
container_title Arctic Review on Law and Politics
container_volume 13
container_issue 2022
container_start_page 171
_version_ 1766294214178504704