Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute
The distribution of legal authority to protect biodiversity in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) between the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the UN Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) has been a contentious issue. In practice, main responsibility has been allocated to LOSC,...
Published in: | Arctic Review on Law and Politics |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English Norwegian |
Published: |
Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v13.3635 https://doaj.org/article/e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674 2023-05-15T14:21:29+02:00 Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute Christian Prip 2022-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v13.3635 https://doaj.org/article/e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674 EN NO eng nor Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/3635/6387 https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562 2387-4562 doi:10.23865/arctic.v13.3635 https://doaj.org/article/e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674 Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 13, Iss 2022, Pp 171-190 (2022) ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (ebsas) convention on biological diversity (cbd) biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (bbnj) marine protected areas central arctic ocean Law K article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v13.3635 2022-12-31T03:53:58Z The distribution of legal authority to protect biodiversity in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) between the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the UN Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) has been a contentious issue. In practice, main responsibility has been allocated to LOSC, under which a new implementing agreement on conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ) is currently being negotiated. CBD was allocated responsibility for providing scientific information and advice on marine biodiversity, which has resulted in the identification and description of 321 Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) worldwide, within and beyond national jurisdiction. These could provide important scientific backing for a coming BBNJ instrument under LOSC, especially as regards the designation of marine protected areas and the conduct of environmental impact assessments in ABNJ. However, the process of modifying EBSAs and identifying new ones has recently been challenged by the CBD Conference of the Parties, harking back to previous disputes over the legal mandate and thereby threatening the entire mechanism that has been established. In the context of international environmental law and law of the sea, this article discusses the potential importance of EBSAs for the expected BBNJ instrument, using the Central Arctic Ocean EBSA as an example. Responsible Editor: Øyvind Ravna, Faculty of Law, UiT The Arctic University of Norway Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Ocean Arctic review on law and politics Law of the Sea Arctic University of Norway UiT The Arctic University of Norway Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Arctic Ocean Norway Arctic Review on Law and Politics 13 2022 171 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English Norwegian |
topic |
ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (ebsas) convention on biological diversity (cbd) biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (bbnj) marine protected areas central arctic ocean Law K |
spellingShingle |
ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (ebsas) convention on biological diversity (cbd) biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (bbnj) marine protected areas central arctic ocean Law K Christian Prip Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute |
topic_facet |
ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (ebsas) convention on biological diversity (cbd) biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (bbnj) marine protected areas central arctic ocean Law K |
description |
The distribution of legal authority to protect biodiversity in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) between the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the UN Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) has been a contentious issue. In practice, main responsibility has been allocated to LOSC, under which a new implementing agreement on conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ) is currently being negotiated. CBD was allocated responsibility for providing scientific information and advice on marine biodiversity, which has resulted in the identification and description of 321 Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) worldwide, within and beyond national jurisdiction. These could provide important scientific backing for a coming BBNJ instrument under LOSC, especially as regards the designation of marine protected areas and the conduct of environmental impact assessments in ABNJ. However, the process of modifying EBSAs and identifying new ones has recently been challenged by the CBD Conference of the Parties, harking back to previous disputes over the legal mandate and thereby threatening the entire mechanism that has been established. In the context of international environmental law and law of the sea, this article discusses the potential importance of EBSAs for the expected BBNJ instrument, using the Central Arctic Ocean EBSA as an example. Responsible Editor: Øyvind Ravna, Faculty of Law, UiT The Arctic University of Norway |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Christian Prip |
author_facet |
Christian Prip |
author_sort |
Christian Prip |
title |
Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute |
title_short |
Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute |
title_full |
Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute |
title_fullStr |
Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identifying and Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): A Key Tool for the Protection of Ocean Biodiversity in Dispute |
title_sort |
identifying and describing ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (ebsas): a key tool for the protection of ocean biodiversity in dispute |
publisher |
Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v13.3635 https://doaj.org/article/e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674 |
geographic |
Arctic Arctic Ocean Norway |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Arctic Ocean Norway |
genre |
Arctic Arctic Ocean Arctic review on law and politics Law of the Sea Arctic University of Norway UiT The Arctic University of Norway |
genre_facet |
Arctic Arctic Ocean Arctic review on law and politics Law of the Sea Arctic University of Norway UiT The Arctic University of Norway |
op_source |
Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 13, Iss 2022, Pp 171-190 (2022) |
op_relation |
https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/3635/6387 https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562 2387-4562 doi:10.23865/arctic.v13.3635 https://doaj.org/article/e1d7887cff744bdabc5ed801dd275674 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v13.3635 |
container_title |
Arctic Review on Law and Politics |
container_volume |
13 |
container_issue |
2022 |
container_start_page |
171 |
_version_ |
1766294214178504704 |