Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East

In 2009, Iceland finds itself negotiating for EU entry alongside a group of 7 candidates and potential candidates from the Western Balkans. All are much poorer than Iceland and suffer from the legacies of regional conflict, ethnic division and under-development, plus specific weaknesses of governanc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration
Main Authors: Alyson J.K. Bailes, Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Icelandic
Published: University of Iceland 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2
https://doaj.org/article/df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128
_version_ 1821833451558404096
author Alyson J.K. Bailes
Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir
author_facet Alyson J.K. Bailes
Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir
author_sort Alyson J.K. Bailes
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
container_issue 2
container_start_page 225
container_title Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration
container_volume 5
description In 2009, Iceland finds itself negotiating for EU entry alongside a group of 7 candidates and potential candidates from the Western Balkans. All are much poorer than Iceland and suffer from the legacies of regional conflict, ethnic division and under-development, plus specific weaknesses of governance, law and order. However, all the Balkan applicants have a clear majority of public opinion in favour of the EU and (except for Serbia) a cross-party consensus on accession. The severity of their problems makes EU and NATO membership their only hope and chance of a peaceful future, and also provides the main motive for the EU to grant their wish. Indeed the EU practises a policy of ‘conditionality’, using the lure of accession as leverage to make them improve their ways. Iceland does not have the same life-and-death importance for the EU unless, eventually, in the context of Arctic strategy. Several EU states have made clear they would not wish Iceland to ‘jump the queue’ past the other candidates. There may be lessons here for Iceland’s handling of its own negotiations.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic
Iceland
genre_facet Arctic
Iceland
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128
institution Open Polar
language English
Icelandic
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
op_doi https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2
op_relation http://www.irpa.is/article/view/1014
https://doaj.org/toc/1670-6803
https://doaj.org/toc/1670-679X
1670-6803
1670-679X
doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2
https://doaj.org/article/df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128
op_source Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla, Vol 5, Iss 2, Pp 225-248 (2009)
publishDate 2009
publisher University of Iceland
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128 2025-01-16T20:38:39+00:00 Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East Alyson J.K. Bailes Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir 2009-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2 https://doaj.org/article/df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128 EN IS eng ice University of Iceland http://www.irpa.is/article/view/1014 https://doaj.org/toc/1670-6803 https://doaj.org/toc/1670-679X 1670-6803 1670-679X doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2 https://doaj.org/article/df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128 Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla, Vol 5, Iss 2, Pp 225-248 (2009) Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Political science (General) JA1-92 article 2009 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2 2022-12-31T03:20:37Z In 2009, Iceland finds itself negotiating for EU entry alongside a group of 7 candidates and potential candidates from the Western Balkans. All are much poorer than Iceland and suffer from the legacies of regional conflict, ethnic division and under-development, plus specific weaknesses of governance, law and order. However, all the Balkan applicants have a clear majority of public opinion in favour of the EU and (except for Serbia) a cross-party consensus on accession. The severity of their problems makes EU and NATO membership their only hope and chance of a peaceful future, and also provides the main motive for the EU to grant their wish. Indeed the EU practises a policy of ‘conditionality’, using the lure of accession as leverage to make them improve their ways. Iceland does not have the same life-and-death importance for the EU unless, eventually, in the context of Arctic strategy. Several EU states have made clear they would not wish Iceland to ‘jump the queue’ past the other candidates. There may be lessons here for Iceland’s handling of its own negotiations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration 5 2 225
spellingShingle Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Alyson J.K. Bailes
Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir
Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
title Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
title_full Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
title_fullStr Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
title_full_unstemmed Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
title_short Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
title_sort iceland’s neighbours in the eu entry queue: contrasts or parallels in eu enlargement to the north and the south-east
topic Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Political science (General)
JA1-92
topic_facet Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Political science (General)
JA1-92
url https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2
https://doaj.org/article/df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128