Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
In 2009, Iceland finds itself negotiating for EU entry alongside a group of 7 candidates and potential candidates from the Western Balkans. All are much poorer than Iceland and suffer from the legacies of regional conflict, ethnic division and under-development, plus specific weaknesses of governanc...
Published in: | Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English Icelandic |
Published: |
University of Iceland
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2 https://doaj.org/article/df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128 |
_version_ | 1821833451558404096 |
---|---|
author | Alyson J.K. Bailes Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir |
author_facet | Alyson J.K. Bailes Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir |
author_sort | Alyson J.K. Bailes |
collection | Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 225 |
container_title | Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration |
container_volume | 5 |
description | In 2009, Iceland finds itself negotiating for EU entry alongside a group of 7 candidates and potential candidates from the Western Balkans. All are much poorer than Iceland and suffer from the legacies of regional conflict, ethnic division and under-development, plus specific weaknesses of governance, law and order. However, all the Balkan applicants have a clear majority of public opinion in favour of the EU and (except for Serbia) a cross-party consensus on accession. The severity of their problems makes EU and NATO membership their only hope and chance of a peaceful future, and also provides the main motive for the EU to grant their wish. Indeed the EU practises a policy of ‘conditionality’, using the lure of accession as leverage to make them improve their ways. Iceland does not have the same life-and-death importance for the EU unless, eventually, in the context of Arctic strategy. Several EU states have made clear they would not wish Iceland to ‘jump the queue’ past the other candidates. There may be lessons here for Iceland’s handling of its own negotiations. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Arctic Iceland |
genre_facet | Arctic Iceland |
geographic | Arctic |
geographic_facet | Arctic |
id | ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English Icelandic |
op_collection_id | ftdoajarticles |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2 |
op_relation | http://www.irpa.is/article/view/1014 https://doaj.org/toc/1670-6803 https://doaj.org/toc/1670-679X 1670-6803 1670-679X doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2 https://doaj.org/article/df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128 |
op_source | Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla, Vol 5, Iss 2, Pp 225-248 (2009) |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | University of Iceland |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128 2025-01-16T20:38:39+00:00 Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East Alyson J.K. Bailes Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir 2009-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2 https://doaj.org/article/df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128 EN IS eng ice University of Iceland http://www.irpa.is/article/view/1014 https://doaj.org/toc/1670-6803 https://doaj.org/toc/1670-679X 1670-6803 1670-679X doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2 https://doaj.org/article/df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128 Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla, Vol 5, Iss 2, Pp 225-248 (2009) Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Political science (General) JA1-92 article 2009 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2 2022-12-31T03:20:37Z In 2009, Iceland finds itself negotiating for EU entry alongside a group of 7 candidates and potential candidates from the Western Balkans. All are much poorer than Iceland and suffer from the legacies of regional conflict, ethnic division and under-development, plus specific weaknesses of governance, law and order. However, all the Balkan applicants have a clear majority of public opinion in favour of the EU and (except for Serbia) a cross-party consensus on accession. The severity of their problems makes EU and NATO membership their only hope and chance of a peaceful future, and also provides the main motive for the EU to grant their wish. Indeed the EU practises a policy of ‘conditionality’, using the lure of accession as leverage to make them improve their ways. Iceland does not have the same life-and-death importance for the EU unless, eventually, in the context of Arctic strategy. Several EU states have made clear they would not wish Iceland to ‘jump the queue’ past the other candidates. There may be lessons here for Iceland’s handling of its own negotiations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration 5 2 225 |
spellingShingle | Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Political science (General) JA1-92 Alyson J.K. Bailes Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East |
title | Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East |
title_full | Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East |
title_fullStr | Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East |
title_full_unstemmed | Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East |
title_short | Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East |
title_sort | iceland’s neighbours in the eu entry queue: contrasts or parallels in eu enlargement to the north and the south-east |
topic | Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Political science (General) JA1-92 |
topic_facet | Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Political science (General) JA1-92 |
url | https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2 https://doaj.org/article/df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128 |