Landfast ice thickness in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago from observations and models

• Published in: The Cryosphere
• Main Authors: S. E. L. Howell, F. Laliberté, R. Kwok, C. Derksen, J. King
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2016
• Subjects: Environmental sciences; GE1-350; Geology; QE1-996.5; Arctic; Cambridge Bay; Canadian Arctic Archipelago; Eureka; Ora; Arctic Archipelago; The Cryosphere
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1463-2016; https://doaj.org/article/de7e1c65a98340b1b221b6ba6632fc39

Observed and modelled landfast ice thickness variability and trends spanning more than 5 decades within the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) are summarized. The observed sites (Cambridge Bay, Resolute, Eureka and Alert) represent some of the Arctic's longest records of landfast ice thickness. Observed end-of-winter (maximum) trends of landfast ice thickness (1957–2014) were statistically significant at Cambridge Bay (−4.31 ± 1.4 cm decade −1 ), Eureka (−4.65 ± 1.7 cm decade −1 ) and Alert (−4.44 ± 1.6 cm −1 ) but not at Resolute. Over the 50+-year record, the ice thinned by ∼ 0.24–0.26 m at Cambridge Bay, Eureka and Alert with essentially negligible change at Resolute. Although statistically significant warming in spring and fall was present at all sites, only low correlations between temperature and maximum ice thickness were present; snow depth was found to be more strongly associated with the negative ice thickness trends. Comparison with multi-model simulations from Coupled Model Intercomparison project phase 5 (CMIP5), Ocean Reanalysis Intercomparison (ORA-IP) and Pan-Arctic Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS) show that although a subset of current generation models have a "reasonable" climatological representation of landfast ice thickness and distribution within the CAA, trends are unrealistic and far exceed observations by up to 2 orders of magnitude. ORA-IP models were found to have positive correlations between temperature and ice thickness over the CAA, a feature that is inconsistent with both observations and coupled models from CMIP5.