A landscape-isotopic approach to the geochemical characterization of lakes in the Kangerlussuaq region, west Greenland

• Published in: Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research
• Main Authors: Emily Henkemans, Shaun K. Frape, Timo Ruskeeniemi, Nicholas John Anderson, Monique Hobbs
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018
• Subjects: permafrost; isotope geochemistry; greenland; Environmental sciences; GE1-350; Ecology; QH540-549.5; Greenland; Impact Lake; Kangerlussuaq; Antarctic and Alpine Research; Arctic; Ice; Ice Sheet
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.2017.1420863; https://doaj.org/article/d940e3d59cd64cf8830a7ac2ebfa4325

In west Greenland, an approximate chronosequence of landscape evolution and weathering exists between the coast, which has been ice free for long periods, and more recently deglaciated areas along the present day ice margin. Traditional geochemical and isotopic analyses (δ18O, δ2H, 3H, δ34S/δ18O (SO4), and 87Sr/86Sr) along with novel isotopic tools, such as δ37Cl and δ81Br, were used to provide new insights into lake geochemical processes along a transect of lakes from the coast to the ice margin in the Kangerlussuaq region. Evaporation was found to be a key process impacting lake chemistry and isotopic signatures in the ice marginal area, with decreasing importance toward the coast. Evaporative processes were apparent in the δ37Cl and δ81Br isotopic signatures of lake-water chemistry. Consistent with previous work elsewhere (e.g., Blum and Erel, 1995) on increased biotite weathering in glaciated environments, 87Sr/86Sr isotopic ratios were found to be more radiogenic (>0.73) in lakes found in more recently glaciated terrain. Sulfide oxidation was the main source of sulfur (as sulfate) in lakes in the ice marginal area, while the influence of marine aerosols and bacterial sulfate reduction increased further away from the ice sheet around the fjord Kangerlussuaq. Groundwater discharge significant enough to impact lake chemistry was not observed in any of the lakes studied, suggesting that little groundwater–surface water interaction occurs in the study area or that recharge conditions are present in the majority of the lakes studied.