Carbon dioxide balance of subarctic tundra from plot to regional scales

• Published in: Biogeosciences
• Main Authors: M. E. Marushchak, I. Kiepe, C. Biasi, V. Elsakov, T. Friborg, T. Johansson, H. Soegaard, T. Virtanen, P. J. Martikainen
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2013
• Subjects: Ecology; QH540-549.5; Life; QH501-531; Geology; QE1-996.5; Subarctic; Tundra
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-437-2013; https://doaj.org/article/d92acfb3b5854751b5fd9156f4d3ad24

We report here the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) budget of a 98.6 km 2 subarctic tundra area in northeast European Russia based on measurements at two different scales and two independent upscaling approaches. Plot-scale measurements (chambers on terrestrial surfaces, gas gradient method and bubble collectors on lakes) were carried out from July 2007 to October 2008. The landscape-scale eddy covariance (EC) measurements covered the snow-free period of 2008. The annual net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of different land cover types ranged from −251 to 84 g C m −2 . Leaf area index (LAI) was an excellent predictor of the spatial variability in gross photosynthesis (GP), NEE and ecosystem respiration (ER). The plot-scale CO 2 fluxes were first scaled up to the EC source area and then to the whole study area using two data sets: a land cover classification and a LAI map, both based on field data and a 2.4 m pixel-sized QuickBird satellite image. The good agreement of the CO 2 balances for the EC footprint based on the different measuring techniques (−105 to −81 g C m −2 vs. −79 g C m −2 growing season 2008) justified the integration of the plot-scale measurements over the larger area. The regional CO 2 balance based on area-integrated plot-scale measurements was −41 or −79 g C m −2 yr −1 according to the two upscaling methods, the land cover classification and the LAI map, respectively. Due to the heterogeneity of tundra, the effect of climate change on CO 2 uptake will vary strongly according to the land cover type and, moreover, likely changes in their relative coverage in the future will have great impact on the regional CO 2 balance.