Less winter cloud aids summer 2013 Arctic sea ice return from 2012 minimum

In September 2012, Arctic sea ice cover reached a record minimum for the satellite era. The following winter the sea ice quickly returned, carrying through to the summer when ice extent was 48% greater than the same time in 2012. Most of this rebound in the ice cover was in the Chukchi and Beaufort...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Research Letters
Main Authors: Yinghui Liu, Jeffrey R Key
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2014
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044002
https://doaj.org/article/d8451126091e4c579f4f2151c7d36a82
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d8451126091e4c579f4f2151c7d36a82
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d8451126091e4c579f4f2151c7d36a82 2023-09-05T13:16:17+02:00 Less winter cloud aids summer 2013 Arctic sea ice return from 2012 minimum Yinghui Liu Jeffrey R Key 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044002 https://doaj.org/article/d8451126091e4c579f4f2151c7d36a82 EN eng IOP Publishing https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044002 https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044002 1748-9326 https://doaj.org/article/d8451126091e4c579f4f2151c7d36a82 Environmental Research Letters, Vol 9, Iss 4, p 044002 (2014) Arctic sea ice cloud Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Science Q Physics QC1-999 article 2014 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044002 2023-08-13T00:37:25Z In September 2012, Arctic sea ice cover reached a record minimum for the satellite era. The following winter the sea ice quickly returned, carrying through to the summer when ice extent was 48% greater than the same time in 2012. Most of this rebound in the ice cover was in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, areas experiencing the greatest decline in sea ice over the last three decades. A variety of factors, including ice dynamics, oceanic and atmospheric heat transport, wind, and solar insolation anomalies, may have contributed to the rebound. Here we show that another factor, below-average Arctic cloud cover in January–February 2013, resulted in a more strongly negative surface radiation budget, cooling the surface and allowing for greater ice growth. More thick ice was observed in March 2013 relative to March 2012 in the western Arctic Ocean, and the areas of ice growth estimated from the negative cloud cover anomaly and advected from winter to summer with ice drift data, correspond well with the September ice concentration anomaly pattern. Therefore, decreased wintertime cloud cover appears to have played an important role in the return of the sea ice cover the following summer, providing a partial explanation for large year-to-year variations in an otherwise decreasing Arctic sea ice cover. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Ocean Chukchi Sea ice Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Arctic Ocean Environmental Research Letters 9 4 044002
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Arctic
sea ice
cloud
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Arctic
sea ice
cloud
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
Yinghui Liu
Jeffrey R Key
Less winter cloud aids summer 2013 Arctic sea ice return from 2012 minimum
topic_facet Arctic
sea ice
cloud
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
description In September 2012, Arctic sea ice cover reached a record minimum for the satellite era. The following winter the sea ice quickly returned, carrying through to the summer when ice extent was 48% greater than the same time in 2012. Most of this rebound in the ice cover was in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, areas experiencing the greatest decline in sea ice over the last three decades. A variety of factors, including ice dynamics, oceanic and atmospheric heat transport, wind, and solar insolation anomalies, may have contributed to the rebound. Here we show that another factor, below-average Arctic cloud cover in January–February 2013, resulted in a more strongly negative surface radiation budget, cooling the surface and allowing for greater ice growth. More thick ice was observed in March 2013 relative to March 2012 in the western Arctic Ocean, and the areas of ice growth estimated from the negative cloud cover anomaly and advected from winter to summer with ice drift data, correspond well with the September ice concentration anomaly pattern. Therefore, decreased wintertime cloud cover appears to have played an important role in the return of the sea ice cover the following summer, providing a partial explanation for large year-to-year variations in an otherwise decreasing Arctic sea ice cover.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Yinghui Liu
Jeffrey R Key
author_facet Yinghui Liu
Jeffrey R Key
author_sort Yinghui Liu
title Less winter cloud aids summer 2013 Arctic sea ice return from 2012 minimum
title_short Less winter cloud aids summer 2013 Arctic sea ice return from 2012 minimum
title_full Less winter cloud aids summer 2013 Arctic sea ice return from 2012 minimum
title_fullStr Less winter cloud aids summer 2013 Arctic sea ice return from 2012 minimum
title_full_unstemmed Less winter cloud aids summer 2013 Arctic sea ice return from 2012 minimum
title_sort less winter cloud aids summer 2013 arctic sea ice return from 2012 minimum
publisher IOP Publishing
publishDate 2014
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044002
https://doaj.org/article/d8451126091e4c579f4f2151c7d36a82
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Chukchi
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Chukchi
Sea ice
op_source Environmental Research Letters, Vol 9, Iss 4, p 044002 (2014)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044002
https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326
doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044002
1748-9326
https://doaj.org/article/d8451126091e4c579f4f2151c7d36a82
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044002
container_title Environmental Research Letters
container_volume 9
container_issue 4
container_start_page 044002
_version_ 1776197929490448384