Survival and Harvest Characteristics of Giant Canada Geese in Eastern South Dakota, 2000–2004

The population of giant Canada geese (Branta canadensis maxima) in eastern South Dakota has increased substantially since reintroduction efforts began in the 1960s. Breeding population estimates of Canada geese exceeded the population management objective of the South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charles D. Dieter, Jeffrey S. Gleason, Bobby J. Anderson, Spencer Vaa, Paul W. Mammenga
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Utah State University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26077/mfjm-gh70
https://doaj.org/article/d6a2b064e91e486095e664036c37198d
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d6a2b064e91e486095e664036c37198d
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d6a2b064e91e486095e664036c37198d 2023-05-15T15:46:23+02:00 Survival and Harvest Characteristics of Giant Canada Geese in Eastern South Dakota, 2000–2004 Charles D. Dieter Jeffrey S. Gleason Bobby J. Anderson Spencer Vaa Paul W. Mammenga 2017-02-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.26077/mfjm-gh70 https://doaj.org/article/d6a2b064e91e486095e664036c37198d EN eng Utah State University https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol4/iss2/9 https://doaj.org/toc/2155-3874 doi:10.26077/mfjm-gh70 2155-3874 https://doaj.org/article/d6a2b064e91e486095e664036c37198d Human-Wildlife Interactions, Vol 4, Iss 2 (2017) band analysis canada geese harvest rate human–wildlife conflicts hunting recovery rate survival rate Environmental sciences GE1-350 General. Including nature conservation geographical distribution QH1-199.5 article 2017 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.26077/mfjm-gh70 2022-12-31T09:33:48Z The population of giant Canada geese (Branta canadensis maxima) in eastern South Dakota has increased substantially since reintroduction efforts began in the 1960s. Breeding population estimates of Canada geese exceeded the population management objective of the South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks by the mid-1990s and has continued to increase at an estimated rate of 3 to 5% per year. Goose-related crop damage complaints have also increased. In 1996, a September hunting season (September 1 to 15) was implemented in 10 counties in eastern South Dakota and was expanded in 2000 to include most of eastern South Dakota. We initiated this study during 2000 to 2004 to estimate survival, harvest, and recovery rates of giant Canada geese. We captured and leg-banded Canada geese in 7 counties in eastern South Dakota during the summers of 2000 to 2003. Of the total leg-banded sample (n = 3,839), we recovered 648 bands during the same year that they were placed on geese (i.e., direct harvest rate), and we recovered 645 banded geese in later years (i.e., indirect recovery rate). Estimates of annual survival rate (95% CI) for adults and immatures were 0.52 (0.46 to 0.59) and 0.68 (0.57 to 0.79), respectively. Estimates of annual recovery rates (95% CI) for adult and immature geese were 0.16 (0.13 to 0.19) and 0.18 (0.14 to 0.21), respectively. Of the total recoveries, 77 and 69% of direct and indirect band recoveries, respectively, occurred in South Dakota. The composite harvest rate estimate during the period studied was 0.22 (0.20 to 0.24). Forty-nine percent of adult recoveries and 44% of immature recoveries (direct and indirect pooled for both age classes) occurred during the September season. In comparison to a previous band-recovery study of resident giant Canada geese in eastern South Dakota, survival rates for both adult and immature geese have declined, while recovery and harvest rates have increased. Survival estimates for this study were some of the lowest documented for giant Canada geese. However, it appears that ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Branta canadensis Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic band analysis
canada geese
harvest rate
human–wildlife conflicts
hunting
recovery rate
survival rate
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
spellingShingle band analysis
canada geese
harvest rate
human–wildlife conflicts
hunting
recovery rate
survival rate
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
Charles D. Dieter
Jeffrey S. Gleason
Bobby J. Anderson
Spencer Vaa
Paul W. Mammenga
Survival and Harvest Characteristics of Giant Canada Geese in Eastern South Dakota, 2000–2004
topic_facet band analysis
canada geese
harvest rate
human–wildlife conflicts
hunting
recovery rate
survival rate
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
General. Including nature conservation
geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
description The population of giant Canada geese (Branta canadensis maxima) in eastern South Dakota has increased substantially since reintroduction efforts began in the 1960s. Breeding population estimates of Canada geese exceeded the population management objective of the South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks by the mid-1990s and has continued to increase at an estimated rate of 3 to 5% per year. Goose-related crop damage complaints have also increased. In 1996, a September hunting season (September 1 to 15) was implemented in 10 counties in eastern South Dakota and was expanded in 2000 to include most of eastern South Dakota. We initiated this study during 2000 to 2004 to estimate survival, harvest, and recovery rates of giant Canada geese. We captured and leg-banded Canada geese in 7 counties in eastern South Dakota during the summers of 2000 to 2003. Of the total leg-banded sample (n = 3,839), we recovered 648 bands during the same year that they were placed on geese (i.e., direct harvest rate), and we recovered 645 banded geese in later years (i.e., indirect recovery rate). Estimates of annual survival rate (95% CI) for adults and immatures were 0.52 (0.46 to 0.59) and 0.68 (0.57 to 0.79), respectively. Estimates of annual recovery rates (95% CI) for adult and immature geese were 0.16 (0.13 to 0.19) and 0.18 (0.14 to 0.21), respectively. Of the total recoveries, 77 and 69% of direct and indirect band recoveries, respectively, occurred in South Dakota. The composite harvest rate estimate during the period studied was 0.22 (0.20 to 0.24). Forty-nine percent of adult recoveries and 44% of immature recoveries (direct and indirect pooled for both age classes) occurred during the September season. In comparison to a previous band-recovery study of resident giant Canada geese in eastern South Dakota, survival rates for both adult and immature geese have declined, while recovery and harvest rates have increased. Survival estimates for this study were some of the lowest documented for giant Canada geese. However, it appears that ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Charles D. Dieter
Jeffrey S. Gleason
Bobby J. Anderson
Spencer Vaa
Paul W. Mammenga
author_facet Charles D. Dieter
Jeffrey S. Gleason
Bobby J. Anderson
Spencer Vaa
Paul W. Mammenga
author_sort Charles D. Dieter
title Survival and Harvest Characteristics of Giant Canada Geese in Eastern South Dakota, 2000–2004
title_short Survival and Harvest Characteristics of Giant Canada Geese in Eastern South Dakota, 2000–2004
title_full Survival and Harvest Characteristics of Giant Canada Geese in Eastern South Dakota, 2000–2004
title_fullStr Survival and Harvest Characteristics of Giant Canada Geese in Eastern South Dakota, 2000–2004
title_full_unstemmed Survival and Harvest Characteristics of Giant Canada Geese in Eastern South Dakota, 2000–2004
title_sort survival and harvest characteristics of giant canada geese in eastern south dakota, 2000–2004
publisher Utah State University
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.26077/mfjm-gh70
https://doaj.org/article/d6a2b064e91e486095e664036c37198d
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Branta canadensis
genre_facet Branta canadensis
op_source Human-Wildlife Interactions, Vol 4, Iss 2 (2017)
op_relation https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol4/iss2/9
https://doaj.org/toc/2155-3874
doi:10.26077/mfjm-gh70
2155-3874
https://doaj.org/article/d6a2b064e91e486095e664036c37198d
op_doi https://doi.org/10.26077/mfjm-gh70
_version_ 1766381073403478016