Risk Assessment Model System for Aquatic Animal Introduction Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

The spread of invasive species (IS) has the potential to upset ecosystem balances. In extreme cases, this can hinder economical utilization of both aquatic (fisheries) and terrestrial (agricultural) systems. As a result, many countries regard risk assessment of IS as an important process for solving...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animals
Main Authors: Xuxin Zhang, Hehe Du, Zhouzhou Zhao, Ying Wu, Zhenjie Cao, Yongcan Zhou, Yun Sun
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13122035
https://doaj.org/article/d55bb46577b1444fa7c989aa89b48f79
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d55bb46577b1444fa7c989aa89b48f79
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d55bb46577b1444fa7c989aa89b48f79 2023-07-23T04:18:57+02:00 Risk Assessment Model System for Aquatic Animal Introduction Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Xuxin Zhang Hehe Du Zhouzhou Zhao Ying Wu Zhenjie Cao Yongcan Zhou Yun Sun 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13122035 https://doaj.org/article/d55bb46577b1444fa7c989aa89b48f79 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/12/2035 https://doaj.org/toc/2076-2615 doi:10.3390/ani13122035 2076-2615 https://doaj.org/article/d55bb46577b1444fa7c989aa89b48f79 Animals, Vol 13, Iss 2035, p 2035 (2023) biological invasion invasive species (IS) introduced aquatic animals risk assessment analytic hierarchy process (AHP) aquatic ecosystem Veterinary medicine SF600-1100 Zoology QL1-991 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13122035 2023-07-02T00:39:09Z The spread of invasive species (IS) has the potential to upset ecosystem balances. In extreme cases, this can hinder economical utilization of both aquatic (fisheries) and terrestrial (agricultural) systems. As a result, many countries regard risk assessment of IS as an important process for solving the problem of biological invasion. Yet, some IS are purposefully introduced for what is seen as their potential economic benefits. Thus, conducting IS risk assessments and then formulating policies based on scientific information will allow protocols to be developed that can reduce problems associated with IS incursions, whether occurring purposefully or not. However, the risk assessment methods currently adopted by most countries use qualitative or semiquantitative methodologies. Currently, there is a mismatch between qualitative and quantitative assessments. Moreover, most assessment systems are for terrestrial animals. What is needed is an assessment system for aquatic animals; however, those currently available are relatively rudimentary. To fill this gap, we used the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to build a risk assessment model system for aquatic IS. Our AHP has four primary indexes, twelve secondary indexes, and sixty tertiary indexes. We used this AHP to conduct quantitative risk assessments on five aquatic animals that are typically introduced in China, which have distinct biological characteristics, specific introduction purposes, and can represent different types of aquatic animals. The assessment results show that the risk grade for Pterygoplichthys pardalis is high; the risk grade for Macrobrachium rosenbergii , Crassostrea gigas , and Trachemys scripta elegans is medium; and the grade risk for Ambystoma mexicanum is low. Risk assessment of the introduction of aquatic animals using our AHP is effective, and it provides support for the introduction and healthy breeding of aquatic animals. Thus, the AHP model can provide a basis for decision-making risk management concerning the introduction of species. Article in Journal/Newspaper Crassostrea gigas Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Animals 13 12 2035
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic biological invasion
invasive species (IS)
introduced aquatic animals
risk assessment
analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
aquatic ecosystem
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
spellingShingle biological invasion
invasive species (IS)
introduced aquatic animals
risk assessment
analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
aquatic ecosystem
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
Xuxin Zhang
Hehe Du
Zhouzhou Zhao
Ying Wu
Zhenjie Cao
Yongcan Zhou
Yun Sun
Risk Assessment Model System for Aquatic Animal Introduction Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
topic_facet biological invasion
invasive species (IS)
introduced aquatic animals
risk assessment
analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
aquatic ecosystem
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
description The spread of invasive species (IS) has the potential to upset ecosystem balances. In extreme cases, this can hinder economical utilization of both aquatic (fisheries) and terrestrial (agricultural) systems. As a result, many countries regard risk assessment of IS as an important process for solving the problem of biological invasion. Yet, some IS are purposefully introduced for what is seen as their potential economic benefits. Thus, conducting IS risk assessments and then formulating policies based on scientific information will allow protocols to be developed that can reduce problems associated with IS incursions, whether occurring purposefully or not. However, the risk assessment methods currently adopted by most countries use qualitative or semiquantitative methodologies. Currently, there is a mismatch between qualitative and quantitative assessments. Moreover, most assessment systems are for terrestrial animals. What is needed is an assessment system for aquatic animals; however, those currently available are relatively rudimentary. To fill this gap, we used the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to build a risk assessment model system for aquatic IS. Our AHP has four primary indexes, twelve secondary indexes, and sixty tertiary indexes. We used this AHP to conduct quantitative risk assessments on five aquatic animals that are typically introduced in China, which have distinct biological characteristics, specific introduction purposes, and can represent different types of aquatic animals. The assessment results show that the risk grade for Pterygoplichthys pardalis is high; the risk grade for Macrobrachium rosenbergii , Crassostrea gigas , and Trachemys scripta elegans is medium; and the grade risk for Ambystoma mexicanum is low. Risk assessment of the introduction of aquatic animals using our AHP is effective, and it provides support for the introduction and healthy breeding of aquatic animals. Thus, the AHP model can provide a basis for decision-making risk management concerning the introduction of species.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Xuxin Zhang
Hehe Du
Zhouzhou Zhao
Ying Wu
Zhenjie Cao
Yongcan Zhou
Yun Sun
author_facet Xuxin Zhang
Hehe Du
Zhouzhou Zhao
Ying Wu
Zhenjie Cao
Yongcan Zhou
Yun Sun
author_sort Xuxin Zhang
title Risk Assessment Model System for Aquatic Animal Introduction Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
title_short Risk Assessment Model System for Aquatic Animal Introduction Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
title_full Risk Assessment Model System for Aquatic Animal Introduction Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
title_fullStr Risk Assessment Model System for Aquatic Animal Introduction Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
title_full_unstemmed Risk Assessment Model System for Aquatic Animal Introduction Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
title_sort risk assessment model system for aquatic animal introduction based on analytic hierarchy process (ahp)
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13122035
https://doaj.org/article/d55bb46577b1444fa7c989aa89b48f79
genre Crassostrea gigas
genre_facet Crassostrea gigas
op_source Animals, Vol 13, Iss 2035, p 2035 (2023)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/12/2035
https://doaj.org/toc/2076-2615
doi:10.3390/ani13122035
2076-2615
https://doaj.org/article/d55bb46577b1444fa7c989aa89b48f79
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13122035
container_title Animals
container_volume 13
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2035
_version_ 1772181678838513664