Banknoten als sprachenpolitisches Instrument

For modern states, multilingualism is not an exception, but the norm. Most states explicitly deal with the status of their languages through their (often rather sparse) legislation, while implicitly reflecting their policy through language use on official documents. Banknotes provide a link between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistik Online
Main Author: Simon Proell
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:German
English
Spanish
French
Italian
Published: Bern Open Publishing 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.72.1975
https://doaj.org/article/d4f8cd57f2d8410dbf02716bade3a40d
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d4f8cd57f2d8410dbf02716bade3a40d
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d4f8cd57f2d8410dbf02716bade3a40d 2023-05-15T16:10:49+02:00 Banknoten als sprachenpolitisches Instrument Simon Proell 2015-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.72.1975 https://doaj.org/article/d4f8cd57f2d8410dbf02716bade3a40d DE EN ES FR IT ger eng spa fre ita Bern Open Publishing https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1975 https://doaj.org/toc/1615-3014 doi:10.13092/lo.72.1975 1615-3014 https://doaj.org/article/d4f8cd57f2d8410dbf02716bade3a40d Linguistik Online, Vol 72, Iss 3 (2015) Computational linguistics. Natural language processing P98-98.5 Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410 article 2015 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.72.1975 2022-12-31T08:38:11Z For modern states, multilingualism is not an exception, but the norm. Most states explicitly deal with the status of their languages through their (often rather sparse) legislation, while implicitly reflecting their policy through language use on official documents. Banknotes provide a link between the official policy and its common application, as they are both a document of the state as well as an object of daily use. Here, the state is responsible for bridging the gap between legislature, national identity and the (sometimes conflicting) selfconceptions of its citizens. Thus, banknotes ideally provide evidence on a state’s factual (rather than nominal) language policy. In addition, the textual and pragmatic functions of banknotes are not prone to change over time, which qualifies them as excellent sources for diachronic questions. This article exemplarily illustrates the language policies of Norway, the Faroe Islands, Belgium and Luxembourg, as seen from a sociohistorical perspective, with their respective note emissions during their newer language history (19th and 20th centuries). It closes with a proposal for a typology of different language policies. Article in Journal/Newspaper Faroe Islands Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Faroe Islands Norway Linguistik Online 72 3
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language German
English
Spanish
French
Italian
topic Computational linguistics. Natural language processing
P98-98.5
Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar
P101-410
spellingShingle Computational linguistics. Natural language processing
P98-98.5
Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar
P101-410
Simon Proell
Banknoten als sprachenpolitisches Instrument
topic_facet Computational linguistics. Natural language processing
P98-98.5
Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar
P101-410
description For modern states, multilingualism is not an exception, but the norm. Most states explicitly deal with the status of their languages through their (often rather sparse) legislation, while implicitly reflecting their policy through language use on official documents. Banknotes provide a link between the official policy and its common application, as they are both a document of the state as well as an object of daily use. Here, the state is responsible for bridging the gap between legislature, national identity and the (sometimes conflicting) selfconceptions of its citizens. Thus, banknotes ideally provide evidence on a state’s factual (rather than nominal) language policy. In addition, the textual and pragmatic functions of banknotes are not prone to change over time, which qualifies them as excellent sources for diachronic questions. This article exemplarily illustrates the language policies of Norway, the Faroe Islands, Belgium and Luxembourg, as seen from a sociohistorical perspective, with their respective note emissions during their newer language history (19th and 20th centuries). It closes with a proposal for a typology of different language policies.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Simon Proell
author_facet Simon Proell
author_sort Simon Proell
title Banknoten als sprachenpolitisches Instrument
title_short Banknoten als sprachenpolitisches Instrument
title_full Banknoten als sprachenpolitisches Instrument
title_fullStr Banknoten als sprachenpolitisches Instrument
title_full_unstemmed Banknoten als sprachenpolitisches Instrument
title_sort banknoten als sprachenpolitisches instrument
publisher Bern Open Publishing
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.72.1975
https://doaj.org/article/d4f8cd57f2d8410dbf02716bade3a40d
geographic Faroe Islands
Norway
geographic_facet Faroe Islands
Norway
genre Faroe Islands
genre_facet Faroe Islands
op_source Linguistik Online, Vol 72, Iss 3 (2015)
op_relation https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1975
https://doaj.org/toc/1615-3014
doi:10.13092/lo.72.1975
1615-3014
https://doaj.org/article/d4f8cd57f2d8410dbf02716bade3a40d
op_doi https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.72.1975
container_title Linguistik Online
container_volume 72
container_issue 3
_version_ 1765995961086115840