Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?

Inter- and intra-annual variation in forage quality may influence population dynamics of Peary caribou and muskoxen on Banks Island. From 1993 to 1998 we collected 300 composite samples of sedge (Carex aquatilis and Carex spp.), willow (Salix arctica), legume (Oxytropis spp. and Astragalus spp.), an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rangifer
Main Authors: Nicholas C. Larter, John A. Nagy, David S. Hik
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7557/2.22.2.1533
https://doaj.org/article/d39257a0a0054f9cba8bc9617e8db86b
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d39257a0a0054f9cba8bc9617e8db86b
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d39257a0a0054f9cba8bc9617e8db86b 2023-05-15T15:05:32+02:00 Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island? Nicholas C. Larter John A. Nagy David S. Hik 2002-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.7557/2.22.2.1533 https://doaj.org/article/d39257a0a0054f9cba8bc9617e8db86b EN eng Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1533 https://doaj.org/toc/1890-6729 doi:10.7557/2.22.2.1533 1890-6729 https://doaj.org/article/d39257a0a0054f9cba8bc9617e8db86b Rangifer, Vol 22, Iss 2 (2002) arctic digestibility energy fibre lignin nitrogen Animal culture SF1-1100 article 2002 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.7557/2.22.2.1533 2022-12-31T02:11:54Z Inter- and intra-annual variation in forage quality may influence population dynamics of Peary caribou and muskoxen on Banks Island. From 1993 to 1998 we collected 300 composite samples of sedge (Carex aquatilis and Carex spp.), willow (Salix arctica), legume (Oxytropis spp. and Astragalus spp.), and avens (Dryas integrifolia). Samples were collected in mid-June (start of the growing season), mid-July (peak of the growing season), mid-late August (senescence), and early (November), mid- (February), and late- (April/May) winter. We analysed forages for percent digestibility (in vitro acid-pepsin dry matter digestibility), crude protein (CP), fibre, lignin, and energy content. There was significant inter-annual variation in levels of lignin, fibre, and energy, and significant intra-annual (seasonal) variation for all quality measures and forages, which reflected the strong difference in quality between summer and winter. We discuss the relationship between forage quality and seasonal diet composition of Peary caribou and muskoxen, and the potential implications for the reduced Peary caribou and high muskoxen populations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Banks Island Carex aquatilis caribou Rangifer Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Peary ENVELOPE(-63.867,-63.867,-65.250,-65.250) Rangifer 22 2 143
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic arctic
digestibility
energy
fibre
lignin
nitrogen
Animal culture
SF1-1100
spellingShingle arctic
digestibility
energy
fibre
lignin
nitrogen
Animal culture
SF1-1100
Nicholas C. Larter
John A. Nagy
David S. Hik
Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
topic_facet arctic
digestibility
energy
fibre
lignin
nitrogen
Animal culture
SF1-1100
description Inter- and intra-annual variation in forage quality may influence population dynamics of Peary caribou and muskoxen on Banks Island. From 1993 to 1998 we collected 300 composite samples of sedge (Carex aquatilis and Carex spp.), willow (Salix arctica), legume (Oxytropis spp. and Astragalus spp.), and avens (Dryas integrifolia). Samples were collected in mid-June (start of the growing season), mid-July (peak of the growing season), mid-late August (senescence), and early (November), mid- (February), and late- (April/May) winter. We analysed forages for percent digestibility (in vitro acid-pepsin dry matter digestibility), crude protein (CP), fibre, lignin, and energy content. There was significant inter-annual variation in levels of lignin, fibre, and energy, and significant intra-annual (seasonal) variation for all quality measures and forages, which reflected the strong difference in quality between summer and winter. We discuss the relationship between forage quality and seasonal diet composition of Peary caribou and muskoxen, and the potential implications for the reduced Peary caribou and high muskoxen populations.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nicholas C. Larter
John A. Nagy
David S. Hik
author_facet Nicholas C. Larter
John A. Nagy
David S. Hik
author_sort Nicholas C. Larter
title Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
title_short Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
title_full Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
title_fullStr Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
title_full_unstemmed Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
title_sort does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and peary caribou on banks island?
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
publishDate 2002
url https://doi.org/10.7557/2.22.2.1533
https://doaj.org/article/d39257a0a0054f9cba8bc9617e8db86b
long_lat ENVELOPE(-63.867,-63.867,-65.250,-65.250)
geographic Arctic
Peary
geographic_facet Arctic
Peary
genre Arctic
Banks Island
Carex aquatilis
caribou
Rangifer
genre_facet Arctic
Banks Island
Carex aquatilis
caribou
Rangifer
op_source Rangifer, Vol 22, Iss 2 (2002)
op_relation https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1533
https://doaj.org/toc/1890-6729
doi:10.7557/2.22.2.1533
1890-6729
https://doaj.org/article/d39257a0a0054f9cba8bc9617e8db86b
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7557/2.22.2.1533
container_title Rangifer
container_volume 22
container_issue 2
container_start_page 143
_version_ 1766337213218422784