Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
We compare the Arctic amplification (AA) produced by the two Community Earth System Models CESM1 and CESM2, members of the CEMIP5 (Coupled Models Intercomparison Project phase 5) and CEMIP6 collections, respectively. We find that the CESM1 model reproduces the recent high values of the AA deduced fr...
Published in: | Atmosphere |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820 https://doaj.org/article/d170b5e695864ba4aac39485d2ee2b1e |
_version_ | 1821810571287199744 |
---|---|
author | Petr Chylek Chris Folland James D. Klett Glen Lesins Manvendra K. Dubey |
author_facet | Petr Chylek Chris Folland James D. Klett Glen Lesins Manvendra K. Dubey |
author_sort | Petr Chylek |
collection | Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 820 |
container_title | Atmosphere |
container_volume | 14 |
description | We compare the Arctic amplification (AA) produced by the two Community Earth System Models CESM1 and CESM2, members of the CEMIP5 (Coupled Models Intercomparison Project phase 5) and CEMIP6 collections, respectively. We find that the CESM1 model reproduces the recent high values of the AA deduced from the observed temperature much better than the CESM2. The correlation coefficient within the 1970–2012 time period between CESM1-simulated AA and the observed one is 0.47, while the CESM2 simulation leads to an anticorrelation of r = −0.53. Even the more successful model (CESM1) is not able to reproduce recent high AA values of 4–5. The main cause of this failure is the model’s overestimate of the rate of increase in the mean global temperature in years post 1990. When the CESM1 model’s simulated trend of the mean global temperature is replaced in the expression for the AA by the observed temperature trend, the correlation coefficient increases from 0.47 to 0.75. The CESM1 model is among the best north American models in AA simulation while the CESM2 model is among the least successful. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Arctic |
genre_facet | Arctic |
geographic | Arctic |
geographic_facet | Arctic |
id | ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d170b5e695864ba4aac39485d2ee2b1e |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftdoajarticles |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820 |
op_relation | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/14/5/820 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4433 doi:10.3390/atmos14050820 2073-4433 https://doaj.org/article/d170b5e695864ba4aac39485d2ee2b1e |
op_source | Atmosphere, Vol 14, Iss 820, p 820 (2023) |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:d170b5e695864ba4aac39485d2ee2b1e 2025-01-16T20:16:16+00:00 Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2) Petr Chylek Chris Folland James D. Klett Glen Lesins Manvendra K. Dubey 2023-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820 https://doaj.org/article/d170b5e695864ba4aac39485d2ee2b1e EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/14/5/820 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4433 doi:10.3390/atmos14050820 2073-4433 https://doaj.org/article/d170b5e695864ba4aac39485d2ee2b1e Atmosphere, Vol 14, Iss 820, p 820 (2023) Arctic amplification Arctic climate climate models CESM1 and CESM2 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820 2023-05-28T00:34:38Z We compare the Arctic amplification (AA) produced by the two Community Earth System Models CESM1 and CESM2, members of the CEMIP5 (Coupled Models Intercomparison Project phase 5) and CEMIP6 collections, respectively. We find that the CESM1 model reproduces the recent high values of the AA deduced from the observed temperature much better than the CESM2. The correlation coefficient within the 1970–2012 time period between CESM1-simulated AA and the observed one is 0.47, while the CESM2 simulation leads to an anticorrelation of r = −0.53. Even the more successful model (CESM1) is not able to reproduce recent high AA values of 4–5. The main cause of this failure is the model’s overestimate of the rate of increase in the mean global temperature in years post 1990. When the CESM1 model’s simulated trend of the mean global temperature is replaced in the expression for the AA by the observed temperature trend, the correlation coefficient increases from 0.47 to 0.75. The CESM1 model is among the best north American models in AA simulation while the CESM2 model is among the least successful. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Atmosphere 14 5 820 |
spellingShingle | Arctic amplification Arctic climate climate models CESM1 and CESM2 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 Petr Chylek Chris Folland James D. Klett Glen Lesins Manvendra K. Dubey Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2) |
title | Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2) |
title_full | Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2) |
title_fullStr | Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2) |
title_full_unstemmed | Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2) |
title_short | Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2) |
title_sort | arctic amplification in the community earth system models (cesm1 and cesm2) |
topic | Arctic amplification Arctic climate climate models CESM1 and CESM2 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 |
topic_facet | Arctic amplification Arctic climate climate models CESM1 and CESM2 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 |
url | https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820 https://doaj.org/article/d170b5e695864ba4aac39485d2ee2b1e |