Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus N-methylglucamine antimoniate in pediatric visceral leishmaniasis: an open-label, randomized, and controlled pilot trial in Brazil

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Despite their high toxicity, antimonials and amphotericin B deoxycholate are commonly used for treating visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Few studies showing conflictive data about their efficacy and adverse events in pediatric population are available. This study aimed to evaluate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
Main Authors: Myrlena Mescouto Borges, Maria Cristina da Silva Pranchevicius, Elza Ferreira Noronha, Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero, César Omar Carranza-Tamayo
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0455-2016
https://doaj.org/article/ce8821cd1e4d424ab5c037198b1c6980
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ce8821cd1e4d424ab5c037198b1c6980
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ce8821cd1e4d424ab5c037198b1c6980 2023-05-15T15:12:53+02:00 Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus N-methylglucamine antimoniate in pediatric visceral leishmaniasis: an open-label, randomized, and controlled pilot trial in Brazil Myrlena Mescouto Borges Maria Cristina da Silva Pranchevicius Elza Ferreira Noronha Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero César Omar Carranza-Tamayo https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0455-2016 https://doaj.org/article/ce8821cd1e4d424ab5c037198b1c6980 EN eng Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822017000100067&lng=en&tlng=en https://doaj.org/toc/1678-9849 1678-9849 doi:10.1590/0037-8682-0455-2016 https://doaj.org/article/ce8821cd1e4d424ab5c037198b1c6980 Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, Vol 50, Iss 1, Pp 67-74 Visceral leishmaniasis Children Clinical trial Brazil Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 article ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0455-2016 2022-12-31T03:21:41Z ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Despite their high toxicity, antimonials and amphotericin B deoxycholate are commonly used for treating visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Few studies showing conflictive data about their efficacy and adverse events in pediatric population are available. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate vs. that of N-methylglucamine antimoniate in treating pediatric VL in Brazil. METHODS This was a randomized, open-label, 2-arm and controlled pilot clinical trial. Treatment naïve children and adolescents with VL without signs of severe illness were treated with N-methylglucamine antimoniate (20mg/kg/day for 20 days) or amphotericin B deoxycholate (1 mg/kg/day for 14 days). All patients were diagnosed with positive direct examination and/or positive PCR for Leishmania spp. performed in bone marrow samples. The primary efficacy end-point was VL cure determined after 180 days of completion of treatment. The analysis was performed using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses. RESULTS In total, 101 volunteers were assessed. Efficacy was similar for both groups. The antimonial (n=51) and amphotericin B groups (n=50) had a cure rate of 94.1% and 100%, and 94% and 97.9% according to ITT and PP analyses, respectively. All patients reported adverse events (AE). Serious AE incidence was similar in both groups. Five individuals were excluded from the study because of severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS N-methylglucamine antimoniate and amphotericin B deoxycholate have similar efficacy and adverse events rate in pediatric patients with VL. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 50 1 67 74
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Visceral leishmaniasis
Children
Clinical trial
Brazil
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
spellingShingle Visceral leishmaniasis
Children
Clinical trial
Brazil
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Myrlena Mescouto Borges
Maria Cristina da Silva Pranchevicius
Elza Ferreira Noronha
Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero
César Omar Carranza-Tamayo
Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus N-methylglucamine antimoniate in pediatric visceral leishmaniasis: an open-label, randomized, and controlled pilot trial in Brazil
topic_facet Visceral leishmaniasis
Children
Clinical trial
Brazil
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
description ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Despite their high toxicity, antimonials and amphotericin B deoxycholate are commonly used for treating visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Few studies showing conflictive data about their efficacy and adverse events in pediatric population are available. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate vs. that of N-methylglucamine antimoniate in treating pediatric VL in Brazil. METHODS This was a randomized, open-label, 2-arm and controlled pilot clinical trial. Treatment naïve children and adolescents with VL without signs of severe illness were treated with N-methylglucamine antimoniate (20mg/kg/day for 20 days) or amphotericin B deoxycholate (1 mg/kg/day for 14 days). All patients were diagnosed with positive direct examination and/or positive PCR for Leishmania spp. performed in bone marrow samples. The primary efficacy end-point was VL cure determined after 180 days of completion of treatment. The analysis was performed using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses. RESULTS In total, 101 volunteers were assessed. Efficacy was similar for both groups. The antimonial (n=51) and amphotericin B groups (n=50) had a cure rate of 94.1% and 100%, and 94% and 97.9% according to ITT and PP analyses, respectively. All patients reported adverse events (AE). Serious AE incidence was similar in both groups. Five individuals were excluded from the study because of severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS N-methylglucamine antimoniate and amphotericin B deoxycholate have similar efficacy and adverse events rate in pediatric patients with VL.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Myrlena Mescouto Borges
Maria Cristina da Silva Pranchevicius
Elza Ferreira Noronha
Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero
César Omar Carranza-Tamayo
author_facet Myrlena Mescouto Borges
Maria Cristina da Silva Pranchevicius
Elza Ferreira Noronha
Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero
César Omar Carranza-Tamayo
author_sort Myrlena Mescouto Borges
title Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus N-methylglucamine antimoniate in pediatric visceral leishmaniasis: an open-label, randomized, and controlled pilot trial in Brazil
title_short Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus N-methylglucamine antimoniate in pediatric visceral leishmaniasis: an open-label, randomized, and controlled pilot trial in Brazil
title_full Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus N-methylglucamine antimoniate in pediatric visceral leishmaniasis: an open-label, randomized, and controlled pilot trial in Brazil
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus N-methylglucamine antimoniate in pediatric visceral leishmaniasis: an open-label, randomized, and controlled pilot trial in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus N-methylglucamine antimoniate in pediatric visceral leishmaniasis: an open-label, randomized, and controlled pilot trial in Brazil
title_sort efficacy and safety of amphotericin b deoxycholate versus n-methylglucamine antimoniate in pediatric visceral leishmaniasis: an open-label, randomized, and controlled pilot trial in brazil
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
url https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0455-2016
https://doaj.org/article/ce8821cd1e4d424ab5c037198b1c6980
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, Vol 50, Iss 1, Pp 67-74
op_relation http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822017000100067&lng=en&tlng=en
https://doaj.org/toc/1678-9849
1678-9849
doi:10.1590/0037-8682-0455-2016
https://doaj.org/article/ce8821cd1e4d424ab5c037198b1c6980
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0455-2016
container_title Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
container_volume 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
op_container_end_page 74
_version_ 1766343515626799104