Spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA

Estimating snow mass in the mountains remains a major challenge for remote-sensing methods. Airborne lidar can retrieve snow depth, and some promising results have recently been obtained from spaceborne platforms, yet density estimates are required to convert snow depth to snow water equivalent (SWE...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: T. G. Meehan, A. Hojatimalekshah, H.-P. Marshall, E. J. Deeb, S. O'Neel, D. McGrath, R. W. Webb, R. Bonnell, M. S. Raleigh, C. Hiemstra, K. Elder
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024
https://doaj.org/article/cd7151a43dbc4dbeb26b1be28e1253ef
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:cd7151a43dbc4dbeb26b1be28e1253ef
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:cd7151a43dbc4dbeb26b1be28e1253ef 2024-09-09T20:11:39+00:00 Spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA T. G. Meehan A. Hojatimalekshah H.-P. Marshall E. J. Deeb S. O'Neel D. McGrath R. W. Webb R. Bonnell M. S. Raleigh C. Hiemstra K. Elder 2024-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024 https://doaj.org/article/cd7151a43dbc4dbeb26b1be28e1253ef EN eng Copernicus Publications https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/3253/2024/tc-18-3253-2024.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0416 https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0424 doi:10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024 1994-0416 1994-0424 https://doaj.org/article/cd7151a43dbc4dbeb26b1be28e1253ef The Cryosphere, Vol 18, Pp 3253-3276 (2024) Environmental sciences GE1-350 Geology QE1-996.5 article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024 2024-08-05T17:48:53Z Estimating snow mass in the mountains remains a major challenge for remote-sensing methods. Airborne lidar can retrieve snow depth, and some promising results have recently been obtained from spaceborne platforms, yet density estimates are required to convert snow depth to snow water equivalent (SWE). However, the retrieval of snow bulk density remains unsolved, and limited data are available to evaluate model estimates of density in mountainous terrain. Toward the goal of landscape-scale retrievals of snow density, we estimated bulk density and length-scale variability by combining ground-penetrating radar (GPR) two-way travel-time observations and airborne-lidar snow depths collected during the mid-winter NASA SnowEx 2020 campaign at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA. Key advancements of our approach include an automated layer-picking method that leverages the GPR reflection coherence and the distributed lidar–GPR-retrieved bulk density with machine learning. The root-mean-square error between the distributed estimates and in situ observations is 11 cm for depth, 27 kg m −3 for density, and 46 mm for SWE. The median relative uncertainty in distributed SWE is 13 %. Interactions between wind, terrain, and vegetation display corroborated controls on bulk density that show model and observation agreement. Knowledge of the spatial patterns and predictors of density is critical for the accurate assessment of SWE and essential snow research applications. The spatially continuous snow density and SWE estimated over approximately 16 km 2 may serve as necessary calibration and validation for stepping prospective remote-sensing techniques toward broad-scale SWE retrieval. Article in Journal/Newspaper The Cryosphere Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles The Cryosphere 18 7 3253 3276
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
T. G. Meehan
A. Hojatimalekshah
H.-P. Marshall
E. J. Deeb
S. O'Neel
D. McGrath
R. W. Webb
R. Bonnell
M. S. Raleigh
C. Hiemstra
K. Elder
Spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA
topic_facet Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
description Estimating snow mass in the mountains remains a major challenge for remote-sensing methods. Airborne lidar can retrieve snow depth, and some promising results have recently been obtained from spaceborne platforms, yet density estimates are required to convert snow depth to snow water equivalent (SWE). However, the retrieval of snow bulk density remains unsolved, and limited data are available to evaluate model estimates of density in mountainous terrain. Toward the goal of landscape-scale retrievals of snow density, we estimated bulk density and length-scale variability by combining ground-penetrating radar (GPR) two-way travel-time observations and airborne-lidar snow depths collected during the mid-winter NASA SnowEx 2020 campaign at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA. Key advancements of our approach include an automated layer-picking method that leverages the GPR reflection coherence and the distributed lidar–GPR-retrieved bulk density with machine learning. The root-mean-square error between the distributed estimates and in situ observations is 11 cm for depth, 27 kg m −3 for density, and 46 mm for SWE. The median relative uncertainty in distributed SWE is 13 %. Interactions between wind, terrain, and vegetation display corroborated controls on bulk density that show model and observation agreement. Knowledge of the spatial patterns and predictors of density is critical for the accurate assessment of SWE and essential snow research applications. The spatially continuous snow density and SWE estimated over approximately 16 km 2 may serve as necessary calibration and validation for stepping prospective remote-sensing techniques toward broad-scale SWE retrieval.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author T. G. Meehan
A. Hojatimalekshah
H.-P. Marshall
E. J. Deeb
S. O'Neel
D. McGrath
R. W. Webb
R. Bonnell
M. S. Raleigh
C. Hiemstra
K. Elder
author_facet T. G. Meehan
A. Hojatimalekshah
H.-P. Marshall
E. J. Deeb
S. O'Neel
D. McGrath
R. W. Webb
R. Bonnell
M. S. Raleigh
C. Hiemstra
K. Elder
author_sort T. G. Meehan
title Spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA
title_short Spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA
title_full Spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA
title_fullStr Spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA
title_full_unstemmed Spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA
title_sort spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at grand mesa, colorado, usa
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024
https://doaj.org/article/cd7151a43dbc4dbeb26b1be28e1253ef
genre The Cryosphere
genre_facet The Cryosphere
op_source The Cryosphere, Vol 18, Pp 3253-3276 (2024)
op_relation https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/3253/2024/tc-18-3253-2024.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0416
https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0424
doi:10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024
1994-0416
1994-0424
https://doaj.org/article/cd7151a43dbc4dbeb26b1be28e1253ef
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 18
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3253
op_container_end_page 3276
_version_ 1809946219518099456