Migrating humpback whales show no detectable response to whale alarms off Sydney, Australia

Migratory Group V (Stock E1) humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae are at risk of entanglement with fishing gear as they migrate north and south along the east coast of Australia. This study investigated the effectiveness of 2 distinct tones for use as an alarm to acoustically alert whales to fishi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Endangered Species Research
Main Authors: V Pirotta, D Slip, ID Jonsen, VM Peddemors, DH Cato, G Ross, R Harcourt
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Inter-Research 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00712
https://doaj.org/article/cd3897cb47424518b08a515ce81a292a
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:cd3897cb47424518b08a515ce81a292a
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:cd3897cb47424518b08a515ce81a292a 2023-05-15T17:10:51+02:00 Migrating humpback whales show no detectable response to whale alarms off Sydney, Australia V Pirotta D Slip ID Jonsen VM Peddemors DH Cato G Ross R Harcourt 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00712 https://doaj.org/article/cd3897cb47424518b08a515ce81a292a EN eng Inter-Research https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v29/n3/p201-209/ https://doaj.org/toc/1863-5407 https://doaj.org/toc/1613-4796 1863-5407 1613-4796 doi:10.3354/esr00712 https://doaj.org/article/cd3897cb47424518b08a515ce81a292a Endangered Species Research, Vol 29, Iss 3, Pp 201-209 (2016) Zoology QL1-991 Botany QK1-989 article 2016 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00712 2022-12-31T11:08:16Z Migratory Group V (Stock E1) humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae are at risk of entanglement with fishing gear as they migrate north and south along the east coast of Australia. This study investigated the effectiveness of 2 distinct tones for use as an alarm to acoustically alert whales to fishing gear presence and therefore reduce the chance of entanglement. We compared how whales responded in terms of changes of surface behaviour and changes in direction of travel in response to 2 acoustic tones and when there was no alarm. These 2 acoustic tones were a 5 kHz tone (5 s emission interval and 400 ms emission duration, similar to but higher frequency than the signal from a Future Oceans F3TM 3 kHz Whale Pinger®) and a 2-2.1 kHz swept tone (8 s emission interval and 1.5 s emission duration). A total of 108 tracks (focal follows) were collected using a theodolite at Cape Solander, Sydney, Australia, during the whales’ 2013 northern migration. Linear mixed effects models were used to determine the effect of the different acoustic tones on whale direction (heading), and behaviour (dive duration and speed). Whales showed no detectable response to either alarm. Whale direction and surfacing behaviour did not differ whether the alarm was ‘on’ or ‘off’. Although the response may have been different if the alarms were attached to fishing gear, the lack of measurable response suggests that the types of tones used are not likely to be effective in alarms intended to reduce entanglement of northward migrating Australian humpback whales. Article in Journal/Newspaper Megaptera novaeangliae Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Endangered Species Research 29 3 201 209
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Zoology
QL1-991
Botany
QK1-989
spellingShingle Zoology
QL1-991
Botany
QK1-989
V Pirotta
D Slip
ID Jonsen
VM Peddemors
DH Cato
G Ross
R Harcourt
Migrating humpback whales show no detectable response to whale alarms off Sydney, Australia
topic_facet Zoology
QL1-991
Botany
QK1-989
description Migratory Group V (Stock E1) humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae are at risk of entanglement with fishing gear as they migrate north and south along the east coast of Australia. This study investigated the effectiveness of 2 distinct tones for use as an alarm to acoustically alert whales to fishing gear presence and therefore reduce the chance of entanglement. We compared how whales responded in terms of changes of surface behaviour and changes in direction of travel in response to 2 acoustic tones and when there was no alarm. These 2 acoustic tones were a 5 kHz tone (5 s emission interval and 400 ms emission duration, similar to but higher frequency than the signal from a Future Oceans F3TM 3 kHz Whale Pinger®) and a 2-2.1 kHz swept tone (8 s emission interval and 1.5 s emission duration). A total of 108 tracks (focal follows) were collected using a theodolite at Cape Solander, Sydney, Australia, during the whales’ 2013 northern migration. Linear mixed effects models were used to determine the effect of the different acoustic tones on whale direction (heading), and behaviour (dive duration and speed). Whales showed no detectable response to either alarm. Whale direction and surfacing behaviour did not differ whether the alarm was ‘on’ or ‘off’. Although the response may have been different if the alarms were attached to fishing gear, the lack of measurable response suggests that the types of tones used are not likely to be effective in alarms intended to reduce entanglement of northward migrating Australian humpback whales.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author V Pirotta
D Slip
ID Jonsen
VM Peddemors
DH Cato
G Ross
R Harcourt
author_facet V Pirotta
D Slip
ID Jonsen
VM Peddemors
DH Cato
G Ross
R Harcourt
author_sort V Pirotta
title Migrating humpback whales show no detectable response to whale alarms off Sydney, Australia
title_short Migrating humpback whales show no detectable response to whale alarms off Sydney, Australia
title_full Migrating humpback whales show no detectable response to whale alarms off Sydney, Australia
title_fullStr Migrating humpback whales show no detectable response to whale alarms off Sydney, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Migrating humpback whales show no detectable response to whale alarms off Sydney, Australia
title_sort migrating humpback whales show no detectable response to whale alarms off sydney, australia
publisher Inter-Research
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00712
https://doaj.org/article/cd3897cb47424518b08a515ce81a292a
genre Megaptera novaeangliae
genre_facet Megaptera novaeangliae
op_source Endangered Species Research, Vol 29, Iss 3, Pp 201-209 (2016)
op_relation https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v29/n3/p201-209/
https://doaj.org/toc/1863-5407
https://doaj.org/toc/1613-4796
1863-5407
1613-4796
doi:10.3354/esr00712
https://doaj.org/article/cd3897cb47424518b08a515ce81a292a
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00712
container_title Endangered Species Research
container_volume 29
container_issue 3
container_start_page 201
op_container_end_page 209
_version_ 1766067517736878080