Physical and biological properties of early winter Antarctic sea ice in the Ross Sea

• Published in: Annals of Glaciology
• Main Authors: Jean-Louis Tison, Ted Maksym, Alexander D. Fraser, Matthew Corkill, Noriaki Kimura, Yuichi Nosaka, Daiki Nomura, Martin Vancoppenolle, Steve Ackley, Sharon Stammerjohn, Sarah Wauthy, Fanny Van der Linden, Gauthier Carnat, Célia Sapart, Jeroen de Jong, François Fripiat, Bruno Delille
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge University Press 2020
• Subjects: Antarctic glaciology; biogeochemistry; sea ice; Meteorology. Climatology; QC851-999; Antarctic; Weddell Sea; Ross Sea; Weddell; Annals of Glaciology; Antarc*; Sea ice
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.43; https://doaj.org/article/cbc1b19c051f4970a56cc38218b5e2c5

This work presents the results of physical and biological investigations at 27 biogeochemical stations of early winter sea ice in the Ross Sea during the 2017 PIPERS cruise. Only two similar cruises occurred in the past, in 1995 and 1998. The year 2017 was a specific year, in that ice growth in the Central Ross Sea was considerably delayed, compared to previous years. These conditions resulted in lower ice thicknesses and Chl-a burdens, as compared to those observed during the previous cruises. It also resulted in a different structure of the sympagic algal community, unusually dominated by Phaeocystis rather than diatoms. Compared to autumn-winter sea ice in the Weddell Sea (AWECS cruise), the 2017 Ross Sea pack ice displayed similar thickness distribution, but much lower snow cover and therefore nearly no flooding conditions. It is shown that contrasted dynamics of autumnal-winter sea-ice growth between the Weddell Sea and the Ross Sea impacted the development of the sympagic community. Mean/median ice Chl-a concentrations were 3–5 times lower at PIPERS, and the community status there appeared to be more mature (decaying?), based on Phaeopigments/Chl-a ratios. These contrasts are discussed in the light of temporal and spatial differences between the two cruises.