Intermittent screening and treatment with artemether–lumefantrine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for malaria in pregnancy: a facility-based, open-label, non-inferiority trial in Nigeria

Abstract Background The spread of SP resistance may compromise the effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (MiP) with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) across Africa. However, there is no recommended alternative medicine for IPTp or alternative strategy for preve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Malaria Journal
Main Authors: Ekpereonne Esu, Nicole Berens-Riha, Michael Pritsch, Nuria Nwachuku, Thomas Loescher, Martin Meremikwu
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2394-2
https://doaj.org/article/c8eddb128c1a4e05a9af6dbf151358b0
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:c8eddb128c1a4e05a9af6dbf151358b0
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:c8eddb128c1a4e05a9af6dbf151358b0 2023-05-15T15:17:48+02:00 Intermittent screening and treatment with artemether–lumefantrine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for malaria in pregnancy: a facility-based, open-label, non-inferiority trial in Nigeria Ekpereonne Esu Nicole Berens-Riha Michael Pritsch Nuria Nwachuku Thomas Loescher Martin Meremikwu 2018-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2394-2 https://doaj.org/article/c8eddb128c1a4e05a9af6dbf151358b0 EN eng BMC http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2394-2 https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875 doi:10.1186/s12936-018-2394-2 1475-2875 https://doaj.org/article/c8eddb128c1a4e05a9af6dbf151358b0 Malaria Journal, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2018) Intermittent screening and treatment Malaria in pregnancy Intermittent preventive treatment Artemether–lumefantrine Sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2394-2 2022-12-31T02:55:10Z Abstract Background The spread of SP resistance may compromise the effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (MiP) with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) across Africa. However, there is no recommended alternative medicine for IPTp or alternative strategy for prevention of MiP. This poses problems for the prevention of MiP. This study investigated, whether screening with a rapid diagnostic test for malaria at routine antenatal clinic attendances and treatment of only those who are positive (intermittent screening and treatment) with artemether–lumefantrine is as effective and safe as IPTp-SP in pregnant women. Methods During antenatal clinic sessions at the General Hospital Calabar, Nigeria, held between October 2013 and November 2014, 459 pregnant women were randomized into either the current standard IPTp-SP or intermittent screening and treatment with artemether–lumefantrine (ISTp-AL). All women received a long-lasting insecticide-treated net at enrolment. Study women had a maximum of four scheduled visits following enrolment. Haemoglobin concentration and peripheral parasitaemia were assessed in the third trimester (36–40 weeks of gestation). Birth weight was documented at delivery or within a week for babies delivered at home. Results In the third trimester, the overall prevalence of severe anaemia (Hb < 8 g/dl) and moderate (8–10.9 g/dl) anaemia was 0.8 and 27.7%, respectively, and was similar in both treatment groups (p = 0.204). The risk of third-trimester severe anaemia did not differ significantly between both treatment arms (risk difference − 1.75% [95% CI − 4.16 to 0.66]) although the sample was underpowered for this outcome due to several participants being unavailable to give a blood sample. The risk of third-trimester maternal parasitaemia was significantly lower in the ISTp-AL arm (RD − 3.96% [95% CI − 7.76 to − 0.16]). The risk of low birthweight was significantly lower in the ISTp-AL arm after controlling for maternal age, gravidity and baseline ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Malaria Journal 17 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Intermittent screening and treatment
Malaria in pregnancy
Intermittent preventive treatment
Artemether–lumefantrine
Sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle Intermittent screening and treatment
Malaria in pregnancy
Intermittent preventive treatment
Artemether–lumefantrine
Sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Ekpereonne Esu
Nicole Berens-Riha
Michael Pritsch
Nuria Nwachuku
Thomas Loescher
Martin Meremikwu
Intermittent screening and treatment with artemether–lumefantrine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for malaria in pregnancy: a facility-based, open-label, non-inferiority trial in Nigeria
topic_facet Intermittent screening and treatment
Malaria in pregnancy
Intermittent preventive treatment
Artemether–lumefantrine
Sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
description Abstract Background The spread of SP resistance may compromise the effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (MiP) with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) across Africa. However, there is no recommended alternative medicine for IPTp or alternative strategy for prevention of MiP. This poses problems for the prevention of MiP. This study investigated, whether screening with a rapid diagnostic test for malaria at routine antenatal clinic attendances and treatment of only those who are positive (intermittent screening and treatment) with artemether–lumefantrine is as effective and safe as IPTp-SP in pregnant women. Methods During antenatal clinic sessions at the General Hospital Calabar, Nigeria, held between October 2013 and November 2014, 459 pregnant women were randomized into either the current standard IPTp-SP or intermittent screening and treatment with artemether–lumefantrine (ISTp-AL). All women received a long-lasting insecticide-treated net at enrolment. Study women had a maximum of four scheduled visits following enrolment. Haemoglobin concentration and peripheral parasitaemia were assessed in the third trimester (36–40 weeks of gestation). Birth weight was documented at delivery or within a week for babies delivered at home. Results In the third trimester, the overall prevalence of severe anaemia (Hb < 8 g/dl) and moderate (8–10.9 g/dl) anaemia was 0.8 and 27.7%, respectively, and was similar in both treatment groups (p = 0.204). The risk of third-trimester severe anaemia did not differ significantly between both treatment arms (risk difference − 1.75% [95% CI − 4.16 to 0.66]) although the sample was underpowered for this outcome due to several participants being unavailable to give a blood sample. The risk of third-trimester maternal parasitaemia was significantly lower in the ISTp-AL arm (RD − 3.96% [95% CI − 7.76 to − 0.16]). The risk of low birthweight was significantly lower in the ISTp-AL arm after controlling for maternal age, gravidity and baseline ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ekpereonne Esu
Nicole Berens-Riha
Michael Pritsch
Nuria Nwachuku
Thomas Loescher
Martin Meremikwu
author_facet Ekpereonne Esu
Nicole Berens-Riha
Michael Pritsch
Nuria Nwachuku
Thomas Loescher
Martin Meremikwu
author_sort Ekpereonne Esu
title Intermittent screening and treatment with artemether–lumefantrine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for malaria in pregnancy: a facility-based, open-label, non-inferiority trial in Nigeria
title_short Intermittent screening and treatment with artemether–lumefantrine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for malaria in pregnancy: a facility-based, open-label, non-inferiority trial in Nigeria
title_full Intermittent screening and treatment with artemether–lumefantrine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for malaria in pregnancy: a facility-based, open-label, non-inferiority trial in Nigeria
title_fullStr Intermittent screening and treatment with artemether–lumefantrine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for malaria in pregnancy: a facility-based, open-label, non-inferiority trial in Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Intermittent screening and treatment with artemether–lumefantrine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for malaria in pregnancy: a facility-based, open-label, non-inferiority trial in Nigeria
title_sort intermittent screening and treatment with artemether–lumefantrine versus intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for malaria in pregnancy: a facility-based, open-label, non-inferiority trial in nigeria
publisher BMC
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2394-2
https://doaj.org/article/c8eddb128c1a4e05a9af6dbf151358b0
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Malaria Journal, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2018)
op_relation http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2394-2
https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875
doi:10.1186/s12936-018-2394-2
1475-2875
https://doaj.org/article/c8eddb128c1a4e05a9af6dbf151358b0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2394-2
container_title Malaria Journal
container_volume 17
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766348026662617088