How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts

This study provides an overview of how sacred natural sites are given recognition within the World Heritage system. It offers an analysis of the extent to which sacred natural sites that are part of nine World Heritage sites are recognised in site nomination files, management plans, and governance o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Land
Main Authors: Bas Verschuuren, Alison Ormsby, Wendy Jackson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022
Subjects:
S
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010097
https://doaj.org/article/c8bf1702de454ab887b97d8dd4fcd27f
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:c8bf1702de454ab887b97d8dd4fcd27f
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:c8bf1702de454ab887b97d8dd4fcd27f 2023-05-15T14:00:34+02:00 How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts Bas Verschuuren Alison Ormsby Wendy Jackson 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010097 https://doaj.org/article/c8bf1702de454ab887b97d8dd4fcd27f EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/97 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-445X doi:10.3390/land11010097 2073-445X https://doaj.org/article/c8bf1702de454ab887b97d8dd4fcd27f Land, Vol 11, Iss 97, p 97 (2022) sacred natural sites World Heritage sites spiritual values cultural values intangible values protected areas Agriculture S article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010097 2022-12-31T14:35:45Z This study provides an overview of how sacred natural sites are given recognition within the World Heritage system. It offers an analysis of the extent to which sacred natural sites that are part of nine World Heritage sites are recognised in site nomination files, management plans, and governance of these sites. The World Heritage sites are located across all continents except for Antarctica. We analysed sites in Australia, Greece, Guatemala, India, Japan, Kenya, Malaysia, New Zealand and the Russian Federation. We found that the cultural and spiritual significance of sacred natural sites is under-recognised, especially in natural World Heritage sites. In addition, Indigenous and religious custodians are frequently excluded from site management and governance. We make four recommendations for improving the recognition of sacred natural sites and the involvement of their custodians in the World Heritage process and in site nomination, governance, and management: (1) identification and recognition of sacred natural sites including their associated cultural and spiritual values; (2) recognition of, and articulated roles for custodians of sacred natural sites in the governance and management of World Heritage sites; (3) increased uptake of religious groups and Indigenous Peoples’ conservation approaches to the joint management of World Heritage sites that contain sacred natural sites, and (4) prevention of exclusion of custodians and ecological migration by applying inclusive conservation practices through rights-based approaches. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles New Zealand Land 11 1 97
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic sacred natural sites
World Heritage sites
spiritual values
cultural values
intangible values
protected areas
Agriculture
S
spellingShingle sacred natural sites
World Heritage sites
spiritual values
cultural values
intangible values
protected areas
Agriculture
S
Bas Verschuuren
Alison Ormsby
Wendy Jackson
How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
topic_facet sacred natural sites
World Heritage sites
spiritual values
cultural values
intangible values
protected areas
Agriculture
S
description This study provides an overview of how sacred natural sites are given recognition within the World Heritage system. It offers an analysis of the extent to which sacred natural sites that are part of nine World Heritage sites are recognised in site nomination files, management plans, and governance of these sites. The World Heritage sites are located across all continents except for Antarctica. We analysed sites in Australia, Greece, Guatemala, India, Japan, Kenya, Malaysia, New Zealand and the Russian Federation. We found that the cultural and spiritual significance of sacred natural sites is under-recognised, especially in natural World Heritage sites. In addition, Indigenous and religious custodians are frequently excluded from site management and governance. We make four recommendations for improving the recognition of sacred natural sites and the involvement of their custodians in the World Heritage process and in site nomination, governance, and management: (1) identification and recognition of sacred natural sites including their associated cultural and spiritual values; (2) recognition of, and articulated roles for custodians of sacred natural sites in the governance and management of World Heritage sites; (3) increased uptake of religious groups and Indigenous Peoples’ conservation approaches to the joint management of World Heritage sites that contain sacred natural sites, and (4) prevention of exclusion of custodians and ecological migration by applying inclusive conservation practices through rights-based approaches.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bas Verschuuren
Alison Ormsby
Wendy Jackson
author_facet Bas Verschuuren
Alison Ormsby
Wendy Jackson
author_sort Bas Verschuuren
title How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
title_short How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
title_full How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
title_fullStr How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
title_full_unstemmed How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
title_sort how might world heritage status support the protection of sacred natural sites? an analysis of nomination files, management, and governance contexts
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010097
https://doaj.org/article/c8bf1702de454ab887b97d8dd4fcd27f
geographic New Zealand
geographic_facet New Zealand
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Land, Vol 11, Iss 97, p 97 (2022)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/97
https://doaj.org/toc/2073-445X
doi:10.3390/land11010097
2073-445X
https://doaj.org/article/c8bf1702de454ab887b97d8dd4fcd27f
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010097
container_title Land
container_volume 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 97
_version_ 1766269736405958656