Use of a highly-sensitive rapid diagnostic test to screen for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia

Abstract Background The sensitivity of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria is inadequate for detecting low-density, often asymptomatic infections, such as those that can occur when screening pregnant women for malaria. The performance of the Alere™ Ultra-sensitive Malaria Ag Plasmodium falcipa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Malaria Journal
Main Authors: Vera T. Unwin, Rukhsana Ahmed, Rintis Noviyanti, Agatha M. Puspitasari, Retno A. S. Utami, Leily Trianty, Theda Lukito, Din Syafruddin, Jeanne R. Poespoprodjo, Maria A. Santana-Morales, Feiko O. Ter Kuile, Emily R. Adams
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6
https://doaj.org/article/c7e681ab7d3846c0b5cfcc79054455b0
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:c7e681ab7d3846c0b5cfcc79054455b0
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:c7e681ab7d3846c0b5cfcc79054455b0 2023-05-15T15:12:32+02:00 Use of a highly-sensitive rapid diagnostic test to screen for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia Vera T. Unwin Rukhsana Ahmed Rintis Noviyanti Agatha M. Puspitasari Retno A. S. Utami Leily Trianty Theda Lukito Din Syafruddin Jeanne R. Poespoprodjo Maria A. Santana-Morales Feiko O. Ter Kuile Emily R. Adams 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6 https://doaj.org/article/c7e681ab7d3846c0b5cfcc79054455b0 EN eng BMC https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6 https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875 doi:10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6 1475-2875 https://doaj.org/article/c7e681ab7d3846c0b5cfcc79054455b0 Malaria Journal, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2020) Malaria Diagnostics Pregnancy Rapid diagnostic test Diagnostic performance Molecular techniques Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6 2022-12-31T12:08:14Z Abstract Background The sensitivity of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria is inadequate for detecting low-density, often asymptomatic infections, such as those that can occur when screening pregnant women for malaria. The performance of the Alere™ Ultra-sensitive Malaria Ag Plasmodium falciparum RDT (uRDT) was assessed retrospectively in pregnant women in Indonesia. Methods The diagnostic performance of the uRDT and the CareStart™ Malaria HRP2/pLDH VOM (Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae) Combo RDT (csRDT) were assessed using 270 stored red blood cell pellets and plasma samples from asymptomatic pregnant women. These included 112 P. falciparum negative and 158 P. falciparum positive samples detected by a composite test (qPCR, LAMP, nPCR) as reference standard. Diagnostic indicators: sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the level of agreement (kappa) were calculated for comparison. Results Compared with the reference test, the uRDT had a sensitivity of 19.6% (95% CI 13.9–26.8) and specificity of 98.2% (93.1–99.7%). The csRDT was 22.8% (16.7–30.3) sensitive and 95.5% (89.4–98.3) specific for P. falciparum infections. Performance of the uRDT was non-significantly different to the csRDT (p = 0.169). RDT outcome was stratified by qPCR cycling threshold (Ct), and performance of the RDTs was found to be comparable across parasite loads. Conclusion The uRDT performed similarly to the currently used csRDTs in detecting P. falciparum infections in asymptomatic pregnant women. In these settings, molecular diagnostics are currently the most sensitive for malaria. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Malaria Journal 19 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Malaria
Diagnostics
Pregnancy
Rapid diagnostic test
Diagnostic performance
Molecular techniques
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle Malaria
Diagnostics
Pregnancy
Rapid diagnostic test
Diagnostic performance
Molecular techniques
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Vera T. Unwin
Rukhsana Ahmed
Rintis Noviyanti
Agatha M. Puspitasari
Retno A. S. Utami
Leily Trianty
Theda Lukito
Din Syafruddin
Jeanne R. Poespoprodjo
Maria A. Santana-Morales
Feiko O. Ter Kuile
Emily R. Adams
Use of a highly-sensitive rapid diagnostic test to screen for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia
topic_facet Malaria
Diagnostics
Pregnancy
Rapid diagnostic test
Diagnostic performance
Molecular techniques
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
description Abstract Background The sensitivity of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria is inadequate for detecting low-density, often asymptomatic infections, such as those that can occur when screening pregnant women for malaria. The performance of the Alere™ Ultra-sensitive Malaria Ag Plasmodium falciparum RDT (uRDT) was assessed retrospectively in pregnant women in Indonesia. Methods The diagnostic performance of the uRDT and the CareStart™ Malaria HRP2/pLDH VOM (Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae) Combo RDT (csRDT) were assessed using 270 stored red blood cell pellets and plasma samples from asymptomatic pregnant women. These included 112 P. falciparum negative and 158 P. falciparum positive samples detected by a composite test (qPCR, LAMP, nPCR) as reference standard. Diagnostic indicators: sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the level of agreement (kappa) were calculated for comparison. Results Compared with the reference test, the uRDT had a sensitivity of 19.6% (95% CI 13.9–26.8) and specificity of 98.2% (93.1–99.7%). The csRDT was 22.8% (16.7–30.3) sensitive and 95.5% (89.4–98.3) specific for P. falciparum infections. Performance of the uRDT was non-significantly different to the csRDT (p = 0.169). RDT outcome was stratified by qPCR cycling threshold (Ct), and performance of the RDTs was found to be comparable across parasite loads. Conclusion The uRDT performed similarly to the currently used csRDTs in detecting P. falciparum infections in asymptomatic pregnant women. In these settings, molecular diagnostics are currently the most sensitive for malaria.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Vera T. Unwin
Rukhsana Ahmed
Rintis Noviyanti
Agatha M. Puspitasari
Retno A. S. Utami
Leily Trianty
Theda Lukito
Din Syafruddin
Jeanne R. Poespoprodjo
Maria A. Santana-Morales
Feiko O. Ter Kuile
Emily R. Adams
author_facet Vera T. Unwin
Rukhsana Ahmed
Rintis Noviyanti
Agatha M. Puspitasari
Retno A. S. Utami
Leily Trianty
Theda Lukito
Din Syafruddin
Jeanne R. Poespoprodjo
Maria A. Santana-Morales
Feiko O. Ter Kuile
Emily R. Adams
author_sort Vera T. Unwin
title Use of a highly-sensitive rapid diagnostic test to screen for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia
title_short Use of a highly-sensitive rapid diagnostic test to screen for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia
title_full Use of a highly-sensitive rapid diagnostic test to screen for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia
title_fullStr Use of a highly-sensitive rapid diagnostic test to screen for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Use of a highly-sensitive rapid diagnostic test to screen for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia
title_sort use of a highly-sensitive rapid diagnostic test to screen for malaria in pregnancy in indonesia
publisher BMC
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6
https://doaj.org/article/c7e681ab7d3846c0b5cfcc79054455b0
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Malaria Journal, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2020)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6
https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875
doi:10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6
1475-2875
https://doaj.org/article/c7e681ab7d3846c0b5cfcc79054455b0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6
container_title Malaria Journal
container_volume 19
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766343203620913152