Evaluation of the Antarctic Circumpolar Wave Simulated by CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models

• Published in: Atmosphere
• Main Authors: Zhichao Lu, Tianbao Zhao, Weican Zhou
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020
• Subjects: ACW; CMIP5 models; CMIP6 models; evaluation; model simulation; Meteorology. Climatology; QC851-999; Antarctic; Southern Ocean; The Antarctic; Antarc*
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11090931; https://doaj.org/article/c58b47031dfb43859e04497de3791498

As a coupled large-scale oceanic and atmospheric pattern in the Southern Ocean, the Antarctic circumpolar wave (ACW) has substantial impacts on the global climate. In this study, using the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ERA5 dataset and historical experiment outputs from 24 models of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Phase 6 (CMIP5/CMIP6) spanning the 1980s and 1990s, the simulation capability of models for sea-level pressure (SLP) and sea surface temperature (SST) variability of the ACW is evaluated. It is shown that most models can capture well the 50-month period of the ACW. However, many simulations show a weak amplitude, but with various phase differences. Selected models can simulate SLP better than SST, and CMIP6 models generally perform better than the CMIP5 models. The best model for SLP simulation is the CanESM5 model from CMIP6, whereas the best model for SST simulation is the ACCESS1.3 model from CMIP5. It seems that the SST simulation benefits from the inclusion of both a carbon cycle process and a chemistry module, while the SLP simulation benefits from only the chemistry module. When both SLP and SST are taken into consideration, the CanESM5 model performs the best among all the selected models.