COMPARATIVE RESEARCH ON LOCOMOTOR COMPONENTS OF RHEOTACTIC RESPONSE IN JUVENILE ATLANTIC SALMON (SALMO SALAR L.) AND BROWN TROUT (SALMO TRUTTA L.)

• Published in: Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
• Main Authors: Mikhail Ruch'ev, Denis Efremov, Mikhail Skorobogatov, Alexey Veselov
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English; Russian
• Published: Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2017
• Subjects: white sea drainage basin; varzuga river; atlantic salmon parr; brown trout parr; locomotor components of rheotactic response – threshold; active; critical; Science; Q; White Sea; Kola Peninsula; Varzuga; Atlantic salmon; kola peninsula; Salmo salar
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.17076/eb679; https://doaj.org/article/c137a2c5ff3b4be88fd278b6006b8f6b

We experimentally studied the locomotor components of rheotactic response in three age cohorts (0+, 1+, 2+) of Altantic salmon and brown trout parr from, respectively, the Varzuga River main channel and tributary (Kola Peninsula, White Sea drainage basin). A specially designed hydrodynamic device permitting to regulate the current velocity from 0.05 to 0.9 m/s was used. There was no reliable difference between velocity thresholds for 0+ salmon and brown trout or for 1+ parr of the two species. For 1+ parr, however, the velocity threshold was lower than for 0+ parr in both species. Sensitivity to the current dropped sharply in 2+ parr, especially in brown trout. In brown trout aged 1+ and 2+, the index of active rheotactic response, meaning that locomotion is activated to keep the po sition in the current, is reliably higher than in salmon. The critical rheotactic response index also differed among age cohorts, and brown trout parr excelled, withstanding current velocities of 80–90 m/s for several seconds. Differences in rheotactic response indexes apparently ensue from the hydrological, thermal and trophic conditions of habitats in the main channel and the tributary, which influenced the size and weight of parr in both species. The main channel is mostly inhabited by salmon parr, whereas the tributary is home to brown trout parr, which grow faster owing to the better foraging conditions.