Monitoring Zenithal Total Delays over the three different climatic zones from IGS GPS final products: A comparison between the use of the VMF1 and GMF mapping functions

• Published in: Geodesy and Geodynamics
• Main Authors: Benachour Labib, Jianguo Yan, Jean-Pierre Barriot, Fangzhao Zhang, Peng Feng
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2019
• Subjects: Geodesy; QB275-343; Geophysics. Cosmic physics; QC801-809; Antarctic; The Antarctic; Antarc*
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2018.11.005; https://doaj.org/article/be4d91f47e1e44e08410e9911e9cda9b

The International GNSS Service (IGS) final products (ephemeris and clocks-correction) have made the GNSS an indispensable low-cost tool for scientific research, for example sub-daily atmospheric water vapor monitoring. In this study, we investigate if there is a systematic difference coming from the choice between the Vienna Mapping Function 1 (VMF1) and the Global Mapping Function (GMF) for the modeling of Zenith Total Delay (ZTD) estimates, as well as the Integrated Precipitable Water Vapor (IPWV) estimates that are deduced from them. As ZTD estimates cannot be fully separated from coordinate estimates, we also investigated the coordinate repeatability between subsequent measurements. For this purpose, we monitored twelve GNSS stations on a global scale, for each of the three climatic zones (polar, mid-latitudes and tropical), with four stations on each zone. We used an automated processing based on the Bernese GNSS Software Version 5.2 by applying the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) approach, L3 Ionosphere-free linear combination, 7 ̊ cutoff elevation angle and 2 h sampling. We noticed an excellent agreement with the ZTD estimates and coordinate repeatability for all the stations w.r.t to CODE (the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe) and USNO (US Naval Observatory) products, except for the Antarctic station (Davis) which shows systematic biases for the GMF related results. As a final step, we investigated the effect of using two mapping functions (VMF1 and GMF) to estimate the IPWV, w.r.t the IPWV estimates provided by the Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive (IGRA). The GPS-derived IPWV estimates are very close to the radiosonde-derived IPWV estimates, except for one station in the tropics (Tahiti). Keywords: International GNSS Service (IGS), Vienna Mapping Function 1 (VMF1), Global Mapping Function (GMF), Precise Point Positioning (PPP), Zenith Total Delay (ZTD), Zenith Wet Delay (ZWD), Integrated Precipitable Water Vapor (IPWV)