A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape

Attempts have been made to examine how speakers frame linguistic varieties by employing social semiotic models. Using ethnographic data collected over many years, this article applies such a model to Iceland, once described as the ‘e-coli of linguistics’ – its size, historical isolation and relative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sign Systems Studies
Main Author: Stephen Pax Leonard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Russian
Published: University of Tartu Press 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.05
https://doaj.org/article/bc85e07116784d3a82380bf14060fb67
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:bc85e07116784d3a82380bf14060fb67
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:bc85e07116784d3a82380bf14060fb67 2023-05-15T16:49:56+02:00 A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape Stephen Pax Leonard 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.05 https://doaj.org/article/bc85e07116784d3a82380bf14060fb67 EN RU eng rus University of Tartu Press https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17087 https://doaj.org/toc/1406-4243 https://doaj.org/toc/1736-7409 doi:10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.05 1406-4243 1736-7409 https://doaj.org/article/bc85e07116784d3a82380bf14060fb67 Sign Systems Studies, Vol 48, Iss 2-4 (2020) language ideology semiotics Icelandic purism Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.05 2022-12-31T14:35:04Z Attempts have been made to examine how speakers frame linguistic varieties by employing social semiotic models. Using ethnographic data collected over many years, this article applies such a model to Iceland, once described as the ‘e-coli of linguistics’ – its size, historical isolation and relative linguistic homogeneity create conditions akin to a sociolinguistic laboratory. This semiotic model of language ideologies problematizes the prevailing discourse of linguistic purism at a time of sociolinguistic upheaval. The analysis shows how an essentializing scheme at the heart of Icelandic language policy ensured that linguistic “anomalies” such as “dative disease” and “genitive phobia” indexed essential differences. “Impure” language was indicative of un-Icelandicness. Once monolingual (indeed monodialectal), the Icelandic speech community is increasingly characterized by innovative linguistic transgressions which thus far have not been instrumentalized by language policy makers. It is shown how a semiotic model can help us analyse the function of language ideologies more generally. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Sign Systems Studies 48 2-4 271 296
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Russian
topic language
ideology
semiotics
Icelandic
purism
Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar
P101-410
spellingShingle language
ideology
semiotics
Icelandic
purism
Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar
P101-410
Stephen Pax Leonard
A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
topic_facet language
ideology
semiotics
Icelandic
purism
Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar
P101-410
description Attempts have been made to examine how speakers frame linguistic varieties by employing social semiotic models. Using ethnographic data collected over many years, this article applies such a model to Iceland, once described as the ‘e-coli of linguistics’ – its size, historical isolation and relative linguistic homogeneity create conditions akin to a sociolinguistic laboratory. This semiotic model of language ideologies problematizes the prevailing discourse of linguistic purism at a time of sociolinguistic upheaval. The analysis shows how an essentializing scheme at the heart of Icelandic language policy ensured that linguistic “anomalies” such as “dative disease” and “genitive phobia” indexed essential differences. “Impure” language was indicative of un-Icelandicness. Once monolingual (indeed monodialectal), the Icelandic speech community is increasingly characterized by innovative linguistic transgressions which thus far have not been instrumentalized by language policy makers. It is shown how a semiotic model can help us analyse the function of language ideologies more generally.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Stephen Pax Leonard
author_facet Stephen Pax Leonard
author_sort Stephen Pax Leonard
title A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
title_short A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
title_full A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
title_fullStr A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
title_full_unstemmed A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
title_sort semiotic approach to language ideologies: modelling the changing icelandic languagescape
publisher University of Tartu Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.05
https://doaj.org/article/bc85e07116784d3a82380bf14060fb67
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Sign Systems Studies, Vol 48, Iss 2-4 (2020)
op_relation https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17087
https://doaj.org/toc/1406-4243
https://doaj.org/toc/1736-7409
doi:10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.05
1406-4243
1736-7409
https://doaj.org/article/bc85e07116784d3a82380bf14060fb67
op_doi https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.05
container_title Sign Systems Studies
container_volume 48
container_issue 2-4
container_start_page 271
op_container_end_page 296
_version_ 1766040112021372928