Migration Distance and Body Condition Influence Shorebird Migration Strategies and Stopover Decisions During Southbound Migration

Technological constraints have limited our ability to compare and determine the proximate and ultimate drivers of migratory behavior in small-bodied birds. Small VHF transmitters (<1.0 g) paired with automated radio telemetry allowed us to track the movements of six small shorebird species and te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Alexandra M. Anderson, Sjoerd Duijns, Paul A. Smith, Christian Friis, Erica Nol
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00251
https://doaj.org/article/bb3bf90ff2be45cb84f0098090a83c0c
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:bb3bf90ff2be45cb84f0098090a83c0c
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:bb3bf90ff2be45cb84f0098090a83c0c 2023-05-15T18:28:06+02:00 Migration Distance and Body Condition Influence Shorebird Migration Strategies and Stopover Decisions During Southbound Migration Alexandra M. Anderson Sjoerd Duijns Paul A. Smith Christian Friis Erica Nol 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00251 https://doaj.org/article/bb3bf90ff2be45cb84f0098090a83c0c EN eng Frontiers Media S.A. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00251/full https://doaj.org/toc/2296-701X 2296-701X doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00251 https://doaj.org/article/bb3bf90ff2be45cb84f0098090a83c0c Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Vol 7 (2019) automated telemetry body condition carryover effects flight speed migration distance optimal migration Evolution QH359-425 Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00251 2022-12-31T07:26:55Z Technological constraints have limited our ability to compare and determine the proximate and ultimate drivers of migratory behavior in small-bodied birds. Small VHF transmitters (<1.0 g) paired with automated radio telemetry allowed us to track the movements of six small shorebird species and test hypotheses about migratory behavior in species with different migration distances. We predicted that during southbound migration, species with longer migration distances (>9,000 km; pectoral sandpiper, Calidris melanotos, and white-rumped sandpiper, Calidris fuscicollis) would be more likely to migrate with characteristics of a time-minimizing migration strategy compared to species migrating intermediate distances (5,000–7,500 km; semipalmated sandpiper, Calidris pusilla; and lesser yellowlegs, Tringa flavipes) or shorter distances (~5,000 km; least sandpiper, Calidris minutilla; semipalmated plover, Charadrius semipalmatus), which would migrate with more characteristics of an energy-minimizing strategy. Our results indicate that migration and stopover behaviors for adults matched this prediction; longer distance migrants had longer stopover lengths, departed with higher relative fuel loads, flew with faster ground and airspeeds, and had a lower probability of stopover in North America after departing the subarctic. The predicted relationship between migration distance and migratory strategy was not as clear for juveniles. Despite our prediction that longer distance migrants would be less wind selective at departure and fly into headwinds en route, all species and age classes departed and migrated with supportive winds. Birds with higher estimated fuel loads at departure were less likely to stop in North America after departing the subarctic, indicating that some birds attempted non-stop flights from the subarctic to the Caribbean or South America. Additionally, within species, adults with higher relative fuel loads at departure had a higher detection probability after departing the subarctic, which we interpret ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Subarctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic automated telemetry
body condition
carryover effects
flight speed
migration distance
optimal migration
Evolution
QH359-425
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle automated telemetry
body condition
carryover effects
flight speed
migration distance
optimal migration
Evolution
QH359-425
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Alexandra M. Anderson
Sjoerd Duijns
Paul A. Smith
Christian Friis
Erica Nol
Migration Distance and Body Condition Influence Shorebird Migration Strategies and Stopover Decisions During Southbound Migration
topic_facet automated telemetry
body condition
carryover effects
flight speed
migration distance
optimal migration
Evolution
QH359-425
Ecology
QH540-549.5
description Technological constraints have limited our ability to compare and determine the proximate and ultimate drivers of migratory behavior in small-bodied birds. Small VHF transmitters (<1.0 g) paired with automated radio telemetry allowed us to track the movements of six small shorebird species and test hypotheses about migratory behavior in species with different migration distances. We predicted that during southbound migration, species with longer migration distances (>9,000 km; pectoral sandpiper, Calidris melanotos, and white-rumped sandpiper, Calidris fuscicollis) would be more likely to migrate with characteristics of a time-minimizing migration strategy compared to species migrating intermediate distances (5,000–7,500 km; semipalmated sandpiper, Calidris pusilla; and lesser yellowlegs, Tringa flavipes) or shorter distances (~5,000 km; least sandpiper, Calidris minutilla; semipalmated plover, Charadrius semipalmatus), which would migrate with more characteristics of an energy-minimizing strategy. Our results indicate that migration and stopover behaviors for adults matched this prediction; longer distance migrants had longer stopover lengths, departed with higher relative fuel loads, flew with faster ground and airspeeds, and had a lower probability of stopover in North America after departing the subarctic. The predicted relationship between migration distance and migratory strategy was not as clear for juveniles. Despite our prediction that longer distance migrants would be less wind selective at departure and fly into headwinds en route, all species and age classes departed and migrated with supportive winds. Birds with higher estimated fuel loads at departure were less likely to stop in North America after departing the subarctic, indicating that some birds attempted non-stop flights from the subarctic to the Caribbean or South America. Additionally, within species, adults with higher relative fuel loads at departure had a higher detection probability after departing the subarctic, which we interpret ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Alexandra M. Anderson
Sjoerd Duijns
Paul A. Smith
Christian Friis
Erica Nol
author_facet Alexandra M. Anderson
Sjoerd Duijns
Paul A. Smith
Christian Friis
Erica Nol
author_sort Alexandra M. Anderson
title Migration Distance and Body Condition Influence Shorebird Migration Strategies and Stopover Decisions During Southbound Migration
title_short Migration Distance and Body Condition Influence Shorebird Migration Strategies and Stopover Decisions During Southbound Migration
title_full Migration Distance and Body Condition Influence Shorebird Migration Strategies and Stopover Decisions During Southbound Migration
title_fullStr Migration Distance and Body Condition Influence Shorebird Migration Strategies and Stopover Decisions During Southbound Migration
title_full_unstemmed Migration Distance and Body Condition Influence Shorebird Migration Strategies and Stopover Decisions During Southbound Migration
title_sort migration distance and body condition influence shorebird migration strategies and stopover decisions during southbound migration
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00251
https://doaj.org/article/bb3bf90ff2be45cb84f0098090a83c0c
genre Subarctic
genre_facet Subarctic
op_source Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Vol 7 (2019)
op_relation https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00251/full
https://doaj.org/toc/2296-701X
2296-701X
doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00251
https://doaj.org/article/bb3bf90ff2be45cb84f0098090a83c0c
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00251
container_title Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 7
_version_ 1766210454223323136