Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds

Acoustic harassment devices (AHD) or ‘seal scarers’ are used extensively, not only to deter seals from fisheries, but also as mitigation tools to deter marine mammals from potentially harmful sound sources, such as offshore pile driving. To test the effectiveness of AHDs, we conducted two studies wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Royal Society Open Science
Main Authors: Lonnie Mikkelsen, Line Hermannsen, Kristian Beedholm, Peter Teglberg Madsen, Jakob Tougaard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2017
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170286
https://doaj.org/article/ba1fdcd279db4534b0b15c721d941b2b
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ba1fdcd279db4534b0b15c721d941b2b
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ba1fdcd279db4534b0b15c721d941b2b 2023-05-15T16:33:26+02:00 Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds Lonnie Mikkelsen Line Hermannsen Kristian Beedholm Peter Teglberg Madsen Jakob Tougaard 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170286 https://doaj.org/article/ba1fdcd279db4534b0b15c721d941b2b EN eng The Royal Society https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.170286 https://doaj.org/toc/2054-5703 2054-5703 doi:10.1098/rsos.170286 https://doaj.org/article/ba1fdcd279db4534b0b15c721d941b2b Royal Society Open Science, Vol 4, Iss 7 (2017) acoustic harassment devices seal scarer harbour porpoise harbour seal mitigation pile driving Science Q article 2017 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170286 2022-12-31T11:30:19Z Acoustic harassment devices (AHD) or ‘seal scarers’ are used extensively, not only to deter seals from fisheries, but also as mitigation tools to deter marine mammals from potentially harmful sound sources, such as offshore pile driving. To test the effectiveness of AHDs, we conducted two studies with similar experimental set-ups on two key species: harbour porpoises and harbour seals. We exposed animals to 500 ms tone bursts at 12 kHz simulating that of an AHD (Lofitech), but with reduced output levels (source peak-to-peak level of 165 dB re 1 µPa). Animals were localized with a theodolite before, during and after sound exposures. In total, 12 sound exposures were conducted to porpoises and 13 exposures to seals. Porpoises were found to exhibit avoidance reactions out to ranges of 525 m from the sound source. Contrary to this, seal observations increased during sound exposure within 100 m of the loudspeaker. We thereby demonstrate that porpoises and seals respond very differently to AHD sounds. This has important implications for application of AHDs in multi-species habitats, as sound levels required to deter less sensitive species (seals) can lead to excessive and unwanted large deterrence ranges on more sensitive species (porpoises). Article in Journal/Newspaper Harbour porpoise harbour seal Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Porpoise Harbour ENVELOPE(-130.304,-130.304,54.231,54.231) Royal Society Open Science 4 7 170286
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic acoustic harassment devices
seal scarer
harbour porpoise
harbour seal
mitigation
pile driving
Science
Q
spellingShingle acoustic harassment devices
seal scarer
harbour porpoise
harbour seal
mitigation
pile driving
Science
Q
Lonnie Mikkelsen
Line Hermannsen
Kristian Beedholm
Peter Teglberg Madsen
Jakob Tougaard
Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds
topic_facet acoustic harassment devices
seal scarer
harbour porpoise
harbour seal
mitigation
pile driving
Science
Q
description Acoustic harassment devices (AHD) or ‘seal scarers’ are used extensively, not only to deter seals from fisheries, but also as mitigation tools to deter marine mammals from potentially harmful sound sources, such as offshore pile driving. To test the effectiveness of AHDs, we conducted two studies with similar experimental set-ups on two key species: harbour porpoises and harbour seals. We exposed animals to 500 ms tone bursts at 12 kHz simulating that of an AHD (Lofitech), but with reduced output levels (source peak-to-peak level of 165 dB re 1 µPa). Animals were localized with a theodolite before, during and after sound exposures. In total, 12 sound exposures were conducted to porpoises and 13 exposures to seals. Porpoises were found to exhibit avoidance reactions out to ranges of 525 m from the sound source. Contrary to this, seal observations increased during sound exposure within 100 m of the loudspeaker. We thereby demonstrate that porpoises and seals respond very differently to AHD sounds. This has important implications for application of AHDs in multi-species habitats, as sound levels required to deter less sensitive species (seals) can lead to excessive and unwanted large deterrence ranges on more sensitive species (porpoises).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lonnie Mikkelsen
Line Hermannsen
Kristian Beedholm
Peter Teglberg Madsen
Jakob Tougaard
author_facet Lonnie Mikkelsen
Line Hermannsen
Kristian Beedholm
Peter Teglberg Madsen
Jakob Tougaard
author_sort Lonnie Mikkelsen
title Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds
title_short Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds
title_full Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds
title_fullStr Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds
title_full_unstemmed Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds
title_sort simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 khz deterrence sounds
publisher The Royal Society
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170286
https://doaj.org/article/ba1fdcd279db4534b0b15c721d941b2b
long_lat ENVELOPE(-130.304,-130.304,54.231,54.231)
geographic Porpoise Harbour
geographic_facet Porpoise Harbour
genre Harbour porpoise
harbour seal
genre_facet Harbour porpoise
harbour seal
op_source Royal Society Open Science, Vol 4, Iss 7 (2017)
op_relation https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.170286
https://doaj.org/toc/2054-5703
2054-5703
doi:10.1098/rsos.170286
https://doaj.org/article/ba1fdcd279db4534b0b15c721d941b2b
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170286
container_title Royal Society Open Science
container_volume 4
container_issue 7
container_start_page 170286
_version_ 1766023121376116736