Modeling the Winter Heat Conduction Through the Sea Ice System During MOSAiC

Abstract Models struggle to accurately simulate observed sea ice thickness changes, which could be partially due to inadequate representation of thermodynamic processes. We analyzed co‐located winter observations of the Arctic sea ice from the Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Lorenzo Zampieri, David Clemens‐Sewall, Anne Sledd, Nils Hutter, Marika Holland
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106760
https://doaj.org/article/b9894b7598b345fdb1949a8db7d3a40f
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b9894b7598b345fdb1949a8db7d3a40f
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b9894b7598b345fdb1949a8db7d3a40f 2024-09-09T19:21:07+00:00 Modeling the Winter Heat Conduction Through the Sea Ice System During MOSAiC Lorenzo Zampieri David Clemens‐Sewall Anne Sledd Nils Hutter Marika Holland 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106760 https://doaj.org/article/b9894b7598b345fdb1949a8db7d3a40f EN eng Wiley https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106760 https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276 https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007 1944-8007 0094-8276 doi:10.1029/2023GL106760 https://doaj.org/article/b9894b7598b345fdb1949a8db7d3a40f Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 51, Iss 8, Pp n/a-n/a (2024) Arctic sea ice snow on sea ice winter processes MOSAiC thermodynamics Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106760 2024-08-05T17:49:22Z Abstract Models struggle to accurately simulate observed sea ice thickness changes, which could be partially due to inadequate representation of thermodynamic processes. We analyzed co‐located winter observations of the Arctic sea ice from the Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of the Arctic Climate for evaluating and improving thermodynamic processes in sea ice models, aiming to enable more accurate predictions of the warming climate system. We model the sea ice and snow heat conduction for observed transects forced by realistic boundary conditions to understand the impact of the non‐resolved meter‐scale snow and sea ice thickness heterogeneity on horizontal heat conduction. Neglecting horizontal processes causes underestimating the conductive heat flux of 10% or more. Furthermore, comparing model results to independent temperature observations reveals a ∼5 K surface temperature overestimation over ice thinner than 1 m, attributed to shortcomings in parameterizing surface turbulent and radiative fluxes rather than the conduction. Assessing the model deficiencies and parameterizing these unresolved processes is required for improved sea ice representation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Sea ice Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Geophysical Research Letters 51 8
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Arctic
sea ice
snow on sea ice
winter processes
MOSAiC
thermodynamics
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
spellingShingle Arctic
sea ice
snow on sea ice
winter processes
MOSAiC
thermodynamics
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
Lorenzo Zampieri
David Clemens‐Sewall
Anne Sledd
Nils Hutter
Marika Holland
Modeling the Winter Heat Conduction Through the Sea Ice System During MOSAiC
topic_facet Arctic
sea ice
snow on sea ice
winter processes
MOSAiC
thermodynamics
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
description Abstract Models struggle to accurately simulate observed sea ice thickness changes, which could be partially due to inadequate representation of thermodynamic processes. We analyzed co‐located winter observations of the Arctic sea ice from the Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of the Arctic Climate for evaluating and improving thermodynamic processes in sea ice models, aiming to enable more accurate predictions of the warming climate system. We model the sea ice and snow heat conduction for observed transects forced by realistic boundary conditions to understand the impact of the non‐resolved meter‐scale snow and sea ice thickness heterogeneity on horizontal heat conduction. Neglecting horizontal processes causes underestimating the conductive heat flux of 10% or more. Furthermore, comparing model results to independent temperature observations reveals a ∼5 K surface temperature overestimation over ice thinner than 1 m, attributed to shortcomings in parameterizing surface turbulent and radiative fluxes rather than the conduction. Assessing the model deficiencies and parameterizing these unresolved processes is required for improved sea ice representation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lorenzo Zampieri
David Clemens‐Sewall
Anne Sledd
Nils Hutter
Marika Holland
author_facet Lorenzo Zampieri
David Clemens‐Sewall
Anne Sledd
Nils Hutter
Marika Holland
author_sort Lorenzo Zampieri
title Modeling the Winter Heat Conduction Through the Sea Ice System During MOSAiC
title_short Modeling the Winter Heat Conduction Through the Sea Ice System During MOSAiC
title_full Modeling the Winter Heat Conduction Through the Sea Ice System During MOSAiC
title_fullStr Modeling the Winter Heat Conduction Through the Sea Ice System During MOSAiC
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the Winter Heat Conduction Through the Sea Ice System During MOSAiC
title_sort modeling the winter heat conduction through the sea ice system during mosaic
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106760
https://doaj.org/article/b9894b7598b345fdb1949a8db7d3a40f
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_source Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 51, Iss 8, Pp n/a-n/a (2024)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106760
https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276
https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007
1944-8007
0094-8276
doi:10.1029/2023GL106760
https://doaj.org/article/b9894b7598b345fdb1949a8db7d3a40f
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106760
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 51
container_issue 8
_version_ 1809761323889721344