A retail audit of mosquito control products in Busia County, western Kenya

Abstract Background Approximately 70% of Kenya’s population is at risk for malaria. The core vector control methods in Kenya are insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying, with supplementary larval source management. In 2015, 21% of ITNs were accessed through the private...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Malaria Journal
Main Authors: Prisca A. Oria, Vincent Moshi, Julius I. Odero, Sheila Ekodir, April Monroe, Steven A. Harvey, Eric Ochomo, Danielle Piccinini Black
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03695-1
https://doaj.org/article/b912c1b69fc64a9d827217cfc0385a1e
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b912c1b69fc64a9d827217cfc0385a1e
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b912c1b69fc64a9d827217cfc0385a1e 2023-05-15T15:14:51+02:00 A retail audit of mosquito control products in Busia County, western Kenya Prisca A. Oria Vincent Moshi Julius I. Odero Sheila Ekodir April Monroe Steven A. Harvey Eric Ochomo Danielle Piccinini Black 2021-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03695-1 https://doaj.org/article/b912c1b69fc64a9d827217cfc0385a1e EN eng BMC https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03695-1 https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875 doi:10.1186/s12936-021-03695-1 1475-2875 https://doaj.org/article/b912c1b69fc64a9d827217cfc0385a1e Malaria Journal, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021) Malaria Spatial repellent Mosquito control Retail audit Retail outlets Insecticide‐treated mosquito nets Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03695-1 2022-12-31T06:35:29Z Abstract Background Approximately 70% of Kenya’s population is at risk for malaria. The core vector control methods in Kenya are insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying, with supplementary larval source management. In 2015, 21% of ITNs were accessed through the private retail sector. Despite the private sector role in supplying mosquito control products (MCPs), there is little evidence on the availability, sales trends, and consumer preferences for MCPs other than ITNs. This study, a component of a larger research programme focused on evaluating a spatial repellent intervention class for mosquito-borne disease control, addressed this evidence gap on the role of the private sector in supplying MCPs. Methods A cross-sectional survey was deployed in a range of retail outlets in Busia County to characterize MCP availability, sales trends, and distribution channels. The questionnaire included 32 closed-ended and four open-ended questions with short answer responses. Descriptive analysis of frequency counts and percentages was carried out to glean insights about commercially available MCPs and the weighted average rank was used to determine consumer preferences for MCPs. Open-ended data was analysed thematically. Results Retail outlets that stocked MCPs commonly stocked mosquito coils (73.0%), topical repellents (38.1%), aerosol insecticide sprays (23.8%) and ITNs (14.3%). Overall, retailers reported the profits from selling MCPs were adequate and they overwhelmingly planned to continue stocking the products. Of respondents who stocked MCPs, 96.8% responded that sales increased during long rains and 36.5% that sales also surged during short rains. ITNs and baby-size nets were often delivered by the wholesaler. Retailers of aerosol sprays, mosquito coils, and topical repellents either collected stock from the wholesaler or products were delivered to them. Other commercially available MCPs included insecticide incense sticks, electric mosquito strikers, insecticide soaps, electrically ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Malaria Journal 20 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Malaria
Spatial repellent
Mosquito control
Retail audit
Retail outlets
Insecticide‐treated mosquito nets
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle Malaria
Spatial repellent
Mosquito control
Retail audit
Retail outlets
Insecticide‐treated mosquito nets
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Prisca A. Oria
Vincent Moshi
Julius I. Odero
Sheila Ekodir
April Monroe
Steven A. Harvey
Eric Ochomo
Danielle Piccinini Black
A retail audit of mosquito control products in Busia County, western Kenya
topic_facet Malaria
Spatial repellent
Mosquito control
Retail audit
Retail outlets
Insecticide‐treated mosquito nets
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
description Abstract Background Approximately 70% of Kenya’s population is at risk for malaria. The core vector control methods in Kenya are insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying, with supplementary larval source management. In 2015, 21% of ITNs were accessed through the private retail sector. Despite the private sector role in supplying mosquito control products (MCPs), there is little evidence on the availability, sales trends, and consumer preferences for MCPs other than ITNs. This study, a component of a larger research programme focused on evaluating a spatial repellent intervention class for mosquito-borne disease control, addressed this evidence gap on the role of the private sector in supplying MCPs. Methods A cross-sectional survey was deployed in a range of retail outlets in Busia County to characterize MCP availability, sales trends, and distribution channels. The questionnaire included 32 closed-ended and four open-ended questions with short answer responses. Descriptive analysis of frequency counts and percentages was carried out to glean insights about commercially available MCPs and the weighted average rank was used to determine consumer preferences for MCPs. Open-ended data was analysed thematically. Results Retail outlets that stocked MCPs commonly stocked mosquito coils (73.0%), topical repellents (38.1%), aerosol insecticide sprays (23.8%) and ITNs (14.3%). Overall, retailers reported the profits from selling MCPs were adequate and they overwhelmingly planned to continue stocking the products. Of respondents who stocked MCPs, 96.8% responded that sales increased during long rains and 36.5% that sales also surged during short rains. ITNs and baby-size nets were often delivered by the wholesaler. Retailers of aerosol sprays, mosquito coils, and topical repellents either collected stock from the wholesaler or products were delivered to them. Other commercially available MCPs included insecticide incense sticks, electric mosquito strikers, insecticide soaps, electrically ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Prisca A. Oria
Vincent Moshi
Julius I. Odero
Sheila Ekodir
April Monroe
Steven A. Harvey
Eric Ochomo
Danielle Piccinini Black
author_facet Prisca A. Oria
Vincent Moshi
Julius I. Odero
Sheila Ekodir
April Monroe
Steven A. Harvey
Eric Ochomo
Danielle Piccinini Black
author_sort Prisca A. Oria
title A retail audit of mosquito control products in Busia County, western Kenya
title_short A retail audit of mosquito control products in Busia County, western Kenya
title_full A retail audit of mosquito control products in Busia County, western Kenya
title_fullStr A retail audit of mosquito control products in Busia County, western Kenya
title_full_unstemmed A retail audit of mosquito control products in Busia County, western Kenya
title_sort retail audit of mosquito control products in busia county, western kenya
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03695-1
https://doaj.org/article/b912c1b69fc64a9d827217cfc0385a1e
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Malaria Journal, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03695-1
https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875
doi:10.1186/s12936-021-03695-1
1475-2875
https://doaj.org/article/b912c1b69fc64a9d827217cfc0385a1e
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03695-1
container_title Malaria Journal
container_volume 20
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766345254004326400