How Bats Escape the Competitive Exclusion Principle—Seasonal Shift From Intraspecific to Interspecific Competition Drives Space Use in a Bat Ensemble

Predators that depend on patchily distributed prey face the problem of finding food patches where they can successfully compete for prey. While the competitive exclusion principle suggests that species can only coexist if their ecological niches show considerable differences, newer theory proposes t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Manuel Roeleke, Lilith Johannsen, Christian C. Voigt
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00101
https://doaj.org/article/b82f217ce508455b9d3534455433bf13
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b82f217ce508455b9d3534455433bf13
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b82f217ce508455b9d3534455433bf13 2023-05-15T17:48:39+02:00 How Bats Escape the Competitive Exclusion Principle—Seasonal Shift From Intraspecific to Interspecific Competition Drives Space Use in a Bat Ensemble Manuel Roeleke Lilith Johannsen Christian C. Voigt 2018-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00101 https://doaj.org/article/b82f217ce508455b9d3534455433bf13 EN eng Frontiers Media S.A. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2018.00101/full https://doaj.org/toc/2296-701X 2296-701X doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00101 https://doaj.org/article/b82f217ce508455b9d3534455433bf13 Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Vol 6 (2018) aerial biodiversity coexistence flight insectivore movement Evolution QH359-425 Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00101 2022-12-31T05:29:39Z Predators that depend on patchily distributed prey face the problem of finding food patches where they can successfully compete for prey. While the competitive exclusion principle suggests that species can only coexist if their ecological niches show considerable differences, newer theory proposes that local coexistence can be facilitated by so-called stabilizing and equalizing mechanisms. A prerequisite to identify such mechanisms is the understanding of the strength and the nature of competition (i.e., interference or exploitation). We studied the interaction between two open-space foraging bats by testing if common noctule bats Nyctalus noctula shift their space use in response to simulated aggregations of conspecifics or heterospecific Pipistrellus nathusii. When confronted with playbacks of heterospecifics, N. noctula increased their activity in early summer, but decreased activity in late summer. This pattern was accompanied by a decrease in the proportion of large insects in late summer, suggesting a more intense competition for food in late compared to early summer. When confronted with playbacks of conspecifics, N. noctula did not change their activity, irrespective of season. Our results indicate that in early summer, intraspecific competition is more severe than interspecific competition for insectivorous bats. Likely, conspecifics engage in interference competition for flight space, and may suffer from reduced prey detectability as echolocation calls of conspecifics interfere with each other. During insect rich times, interspecific competition on the other hand may be mediated by fine scale vertical partitioning and the use non-interfering echolocation frequencies. In contrast, when food is scarce in late summer, bats may engage in exploitation competition. Our data suggests that N. noctula avoid aggregations of more agile bats like P. nathusii, probably due to impeded hunting success. Yet, as fast and efficient fliers, N. noctula may be able to escape this disadvantage by exploiting more distant ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Nyctalus noctula Pipistrellus nathusii Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic aerial
biodiversity
coexistence
flight
insectivore
movement
Evolution
QH359-425
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle aerial
biodiversity
coexistence
flight
insectivore
movement
Evolution
QH359-425
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Manuel Roeleke
Lilith Johannsen
Christian C. Voigt
How Bats Escape the Competitive Exclusion Principle—Seasonal Shift From Intraspecific to Interspecific Competition Drives Space Use in a Bat Ensemble
topic_facet aerial
biodiversity
coexistence
flight
insectivore
movement
Evolution
QH359-425
Ecology
QH540-549.5
description Predators that depend on patchily distributed prey face the problem of finding food patches where they can successfully compete for prey. While the competitive exclusion principle suggests that species can only coexist if their ecological niches show considerable differences, newer theory proposes that local coexistence can be facilitated by so-called stabilizing and equalizing mechanisms. A prerequisite to identify such mechanisms is the understanding of the strength and the nature of competition (i.e., interference or exploitation). We studied the interaction between two open-space foraging bats by testing if common noctule bats Nyctalus noctula shift their space use in response to simulated aggregations of conspecifics or heterospecific Pipistrellus nathusii. When confronted with playbacks of heterospecifics, N. noctula increased their activity in early summer, but decreased activity in late summer. This pattern was accompanied by a decrease in the proportion of large insects in late summer, suggesting a more intense competition for food in late compared to early summer. When confronted with playbacks of conspecifics, N. noctula did not change their activity, irrespective of season. Our results indicate that in early summer, intraspecific competition is more severe than interspecific competition for insectivorous bats. Likely, conspecifics engage in interference competition for flight space, and may suffer from reduced prey detectability as echolocation calls of conspecifics interfere with each other. During insect rich times, interspecific competition on the other hand may be mediated by fine scale vertical partitioning and the use non-interfering echolocation frequencies. In contrast, when food is scarce in late summer, bats may engage in exploitation competition. Our data suggests that N. noctula avoid aggregations of more agile bats like P. nathusii, probably due to impeded hunting success. Yet, as fast and efficient fliers, N. noctula may be able to escape this disadvantage by exploiting more distant ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Manuel Roeleke
Lilith Johannsen
Christian C. Voigt
author_facet Manuel Roeleke
Lilith Johannsen
Christian C. Voigt
author_sort Manuel Roeleke
title How Bats Escape the Competitive Exclusion Principle—Seasonal Shift From Intraspecific to Interspecific Competition Drives Space Use in a Bat Ensemble
title_short How Bats Escape the Competitive Exclusion Principle—Seasonal Shift From Intraspecific to Interspecific Competition Drives Space Use in a Bat Ensemble
title_full How Bats Escape the Competitive Exclusion Principle—Seasonal Shift From Intraspecific to Interspecific Competition Drives Space Use in a Bat Ensemble
title_fullStr How Bats Escape the Competitive Exclusion Principle—Seasonal Shift From Intraspecific to Interspecific Competition Drives Space Use in a Bat Ensemble
title_full_unstemmed How Bats Escape the Competitive Exclusion Principle—Seasonal Shift From Intraspecific to Interspecific Competition Drives Space Use in a Bat Ensemble
title_sort how bats escape the competitive exclusion principle—seasonal shift from intraspecific to interspecific competition drives space use in a bat ensemble
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00101
https://doaj.org/article/b82f217ce508455b9d3534455433bf13
genre Nyctalus noctula
Pipistrellus nathusii
genre_facet Nyctalus noctula
Pipistrellus nathusii
op_source Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Vol 6 (2018)
op_relation https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2018.00101/full
https://doaj.org/toc/2296-701X
2296-701X
doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00101
https://doaj.org/article/b82f217ce508455b9d3534455433bf13
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00101
container_title Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 6
_version_ 1766154788015177728