Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices

Commercial forests require early cleaning to ensure the unhindered and uniform growth of crop trees. In order to be cost effective, non-crop vegetation should be uprooted to prevent their recovery. Performing this work manually is a labour-intensive task but it can be done mechanically. We evaluated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Silva Fennica
Main Authors: Hallongren, Heidi, Kankaanhuhta, Ville, Kukkonen, Mikael
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1514
https://doaj.org/article/b7f8d9a4ebb74f959d2098e9bf131bb0
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b7f8d9a4ebb74f959d2098e9bf131bb0
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b7f8d9a4ebb74f959d2098e9bf131bb0 2023-05-15T17:00:19+02:00 Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices Hallongren, Heidi Kankaanhuhta, Ville Kukkonen, Mikael 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1514 https://doaj.org/article/b7f8d9a4ebb74f959d2098e9bf131bb0 EN eng Finnish Society of Forest Science https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1514 https://doaj.org/toc/2242-4075 2242-4075 doi:10.14214/sf.1514 https://doaj.org/article/b7f8d9a4ebb74f959d2098e9bf131bb0 Silva Fennica, Vol 50, Iss 3 (2016) Forestry SD1-669.5 article 2016 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1514 2022-12-30T23:48:56Z Commercial forests require early cleaning to ensure the unhindered and uniform growth of crop trees. In order to be cost effective, non-crop vegetation should be uprooted to prevent their recovery. Performing this work manually is a labour-intensive task but it can be done mechanically. We evaluated the efficiency of two uprooting devices in direct seeded Scots pine (L.) stands ca. 1 m tall. Productivity and quality of the uprooting work was investigated across eight stands and ca. 160 sample plots in northern Karelia, eastern Finland. Time consumption of the uprooters was analyzed through a linear regression model and the work quality through a multilevel multivariate model in terms of the number of individual Scots pine seedlings, processing units (i.e., a bunch of seedlings to be harvested in the future) and broadleaves. The productivity of the narrower modified device was significantly better in terms of time consumption than the wider original device. Work quality did not differ significantly between devices when stand characteristics, regeneration success and pre-existing damage were taken into account. Results indicate that mechanical uprooting devices may be further developed to a cost-effective alternative to motor-manual techniques for the early cleaning of direct seeded commercial Scots pine stands.Pinus sylvestris Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Silva Fennica 50 3
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Forestry
SD1-669.5
spellingShingle Forestry
SD1-669.5
Hallongren, Heidi
Kankaanhuhta, Ville
Kukkonen, Mikael
Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
topic_facet Forestry
SD1-669.5
description Commercial forests require early cleaning to ensure the unhindered and uniform growth of crop trees. In order to be cost effective, non-crop vegetation should be uprooted to prevent their recovery. Performing this work manually is a labour-intensive task but it can be done mechanically. We evaluated the efficiency of two uprooting devices in direct seeded Scots pine (L.) stands ca. 1 m tall. Productivity and quality of the uprooting work was investigated across eight stands and ca. 160 sample plots in northern Karelia, eastern Finland. Time consumption of the uprooters was analyzed through a linear regression model and the work quality through a multilevel multivariate model in terms of the number of individual Scots pine seedlings, processing units (i.e., a bunch of seedlings to be harvested in the future) and broadleaves. The productivity of the narrower modified device was significantly better in terms of time consumption than the wider original device. Work quality did not differ significantly between devices when stand characteristics, regeneration success and pre-existing damage were taken into account. Results indicate that mechanical uprooting devices may be further developed to a cost-effective alternative to motor-manual techniques for the early cleaning of direct seeded commercial Scots pine stands.Pinus sylvestris
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hallongren, Heidi
Kankaanhuhta, Ville
Kukkonen, Mikael
author_facet Hallongren, Heidi
Kankaanhuhta, Ville
Kukkonen, Mikael
author_sort Hallongren, Heidi
title Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
title_short Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
title_full Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
title_fullStr Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
title_full_unstemmed Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
title_sort cleaning scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1514
https://doaj.org/article/b7f8d9a4ebb74f959d2098e9bf131bb0
genre karelia*
genre_facet karelia*
op_source Silva Fennica, Vol 50, Iss 3 (2016)
op_relation https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1514
https://doaj.org/toc/2242-4075
2242-4075
doi:10.14214/sf.1514
https://doaj.org/article/b7f8d9a4ebb74f959d2098e9bf131bb0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1514
container_title Silva Fennica
container_volume 50
container_issue 3
_version_ 1766052962466004992