Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?

Abstract Background Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) has been an important health promotion tool for over seventy years. The most recent version was released in 2007. This study examined Canadians’ exposure to, knowledge, and use of CFG. Methods Data came from the Canadian Community Health Survey’s Rapid R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC Public Health
Main Authors: Joyce J. Slater, Adriana N. Mudryj
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4
https://doaj.org/article/b599b951fb764d6e9ab5eda47305ae69
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b599b951fb764d6e9ab5eda47305ae69
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b599b951fb764d6e9ab5eda47305ae69 2023-05-15T16:16:50+02:00 Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”? Joyce J. Slater Adriana N. Mudryj 2018-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4 https://doaj.org/article/b599b951fb764d6e9ab5eda47305ae69 EN eng BMC http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4 https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458 doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4 1471-2458 https://doaj.org/article/b599b951fb764d6e9ab5eda47305ae69 BMC Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2018) Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4 2022-12-31T04:25:30Z Abstract Background Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) has been an important health promotion tool for over seventy years. The most recent version was released in 2007. This study examined Canadians’ exposure to, knowledge, and use of CFG. Methods Data came from the Canadian Community Health Survey’s Rapid Response on the Awareness and Usage of Canada’s Food Guide, which included 10,098 Canadians ≥12 y in all ten provinces. Questions were asked on familiarity, awareness and usage of CFG and Canada’s Food Guide for First Nations, Inuit and Métis, as well as healthy eating principles and behaviours. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to observe counts and differences among key demographic variables. Results More than 80% of Canadians have heard of CFG however significantly more women than men were aware of the Guide. Most knew that ‘Vegetables and Fruit’ had the most recommended servings and that dark green vegetables should be consumed daily; however fewer than half knew this of orange vegetables. Just under one third had a copy in their homes, and the most common sources for obtaining CFG were child’s school and health professional/trainer. Those who consulted CFG recently were more likely to consume the recommended servings of vegetables and fruits, and to state that their eating habits were ‘much better’ than one year previously. Conclusions CFG has “brand recognition” among Canadians however there are gaps between awareness and eating behaviours. The new Food Guide could consider additional dissemination tools including social media, videos and workbooks tailored to various age groups, demographic groups and settings. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations inuit Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles BMC Public Health 18 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Joyce J. Slater
Adriana N. Mudryj
Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
topic_facet Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
description Abstract Background Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) has been an important health promotion tool for over seventy years. The most recent version was released in 2007. This study examined Canadians’ exposure to, knowledge, and use of CFG. Methods Data came from the Canadian Community Health Survey’s Rapid Response on the Awareness and Usage of Canada’s Food Guide, which included 10,098 Canadians ≥12 y in all ten provinces. Questions were asked on familiarity, awareness and usage of CFG and Canada’s Food Guide for First Nations, Inuit and Métis, as well as healthy eating principles and behaviours. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to observe counts and differences among key demographic variables. Results More than 80% of Canadians have heard of CFG however significantly more women than men were aware of the Guide. Most knew that ‘Vegetables and Fruit’ had the most recommended servings and that dark green vegetables should be consumed daily; however fewer than half knew this of orange vegetables. Just under one third had a copy in their homes, and the most common sources for obtaining CFG were child’s school and health professional/trainer. Those who consulted CFG recently were more likely to consume the recommended servings of vegetables and fruits, and to state that their eating habits were ‘much better’ than one year previously. Conclusions CFG has “brand recognition” among Canadians however there are gaps between awareness and eating behaviours. The new Food Guide could consider additional dissemination tools including social media, videos and workbooks tailored to various age groups, demographic groups and settings.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Joyce J. Slater
Adriana N. Mudryj
author_facet Joyce J. Slater
Adriana N. Mudryj
author_sort Joyce J. Slater
title Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_short Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_full Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_fullStr Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_full_unstemmed Are we really “eating well with Canada’s food guide”?
title_sort are we really “eating well with canada’s food guide”?
publisher BMC
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4
https://doaj.org/article/b599b951fb764d6e9ab5eda47305ae69
genre First Nations
inuit
genre_facet First Nations
inuit
op_source BMC Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2018)
op_relation http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4
https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458
doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4
1471-2458
https://doaj.org/article/b599b951fb764d6e9ab5eda47305ae69
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5540-4
container_title BMC Public Health
container_volume 18
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766002691944742912