Language Processing at Its Trickiest: Grammatical Illusions and Heuristics of Judgment

Humans are intuitively good at providing judgments about what forms part of their native language and what does not. Although such judgments are robust, consistent, and reliable, human cognition is demonstrably fallible to illusions of various types. Language is no exception. In the linguistic domai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Languages
Main Author: Evelina Leivada
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020
Subjects:
P
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5030029
https://doaj.org/article/b3ee28f2ab3c434dbca96141cf99f0b8
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b3ee28f2ab3c434dbca96141cf99f0b8
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b3ee28f2ab3c434dbca96141cf99f0b8 2023-05-15T18:34:48+02:00 Language Processing at Its Trickiest: Grammatical Illusions and Heuristics of Judgment Evelina Leivada 2020-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5030029 https://doaj.org/article/b3ee28f2ab3c434dbca96141cf99f0b8 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/5/3/29 https://doaj.org/toc/2226-471X doi:10.3390/languages5030029 2226-471X https://doaj.org/article/b3ee28f2ab3c434dbca96141cf99f0b8 Languages, Vol 5, Iss 29, p 29 (2020) bilectalism grammatical illusions acceptability judgments reaction times parsing Language and Literature P article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5030029 2022-12-30T23:54:25Z Humans are intuitively good at providing judgments about what forms part of their native language and what does not. Although such judgments are robust, consistent, and reliable, human cognition is demonstrably fallible to illusions of various types. Language is no exception. In the linguistic domain, several types of sentences have been shown to trick the parser into giving them a high acceptability judgment despite their ill-formedness. One example is the so-called comparative illusion (‘More people have been to Tromsø than I have’). To this day, comparative illusions have been tested mainly with monolingual, neurotypical speakers of English. The present research aims to broaden our understanding of this phenomenon by putting it to test in two populations that differ in one crucial factor: the number of languages they speak. A timed acceptability judgment task was administered to monolingual speakers of Standard Greek and bi(dia)lectal speakers of Standard and Cypriot Greek. The results are not fully in line with any of the semantic re-analyses proposed for the illusion so far, hence a new proposal is offered about what interpretation induces the illusion, appreciating the influence of both grammatical processing and cognitive heuristics. Second, the results reveal an effect of developmental trajectory. This effect may be linked to an enhanced ability to spot the illusion in bi(dia)lectals, but several factors can be identified as possible culprits behind this result. After discussing each of them, it is argued that having two grammars may facilitate the setting of a higher processing threshold, something that would entail decreased fallibility to grammatical illusions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tromsø Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Tromsø Languages 5 3 29
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic bilectalism
grammatical illusions
acceptability judgments
reaction times
parsing
Language and Literature
P
spellingShingle bilectalism
grammatical illusions
acceptability judgments
reaction times
parsing
Language and Literature
P
Evelina Leivada
Language Processing at Its Trickiest: Grammatical Illusions and Heuristics of Judgment
topic_facet bilectalism
grammatical illusions
acceptability judgments
reaction times
parsing
Language and Literature
P
description Humans are intuitively good at providing judgments about what forms part of their native language and what does not. Although such judgments are robust, consistent, and reliable, human cognition is demonstrably fallible to illusions of various types. Language is no exception. In the linguistic domain, several types of sentences have been shown to trick the parser into giving them a high acceptability judgment despite their ill-formedness. One example is the so-called comparative illusion (‘More people have been to Tromsø than I have’). To this day, comparative illusions have been tested mainly with monolingual, neurotypical speakers of English. The present research aims to broaden our understanding of this phenomenon by putting it to test in two populations that differ in one crucial factor: the number of languages they speak. A timed acceptability judgment task was administered to monolingual speakers of Standard Greek and bi(dia)lectal speakers of Standard and Cypriot Greek. The results are not fully in line with any of the semantic re-analyses proposed for the illusion so far, hence a new proposal is offered about what interpretation induces the illusion, appreciating the influence of both grammatical processing and cognitive heuristics. Second, the results reveal an effect of developmental trajectory. This effect may be linked to an enhanced ability to spot the illusion in bi(dia)lectals, but several factors can be identified as possible culprits behind this result. After discussing each of them, it is argued that having two grammars may facilitate the setting of a higher processing threshold, something that would entail decreased fallibility to grammatical illusions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Evelina Leivada
author_facet Evelina Leivada
author_sort Evelina Leivada
title Language Processing at Its Trickiest: Grammatical Illusions and Heuristics of Judgment
title_short Language Processing at Its Trickiest: Grammatical Illusions and Heuristics of Judgment
title_full Language Processing at Its Trickiest: Grammatical Illusions and Heuristics of Judgment
title_fullStr Language Processing at Its Trickiest: Grammatical Illusions and Heuristics of Judgment
title_full_unstemmed Language Processing at Its Trickiest: Grammatical Illusions and Heuristics of Judgment
title_sort language processing at its trickiest: grammatical illusions and heuristics of judgment
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5030029
https://doaj.org/article/b3ee28f2ab3c434dbca96141cf99f0b8
geographic Tromsø
geographic_facet Tromsø
genre Tromsø
genre_facet Tromsø
op_source Languages, Vol 5, Iss 29, p 29 (2020)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/5/3/29
https://doaj.org/toc/2226-471X
doi:10.3390/languages5030029
2226-471X
https://doaj.org/article/b3ee28f2ab3c434dbca96141cf99f0b8
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5030029
container_title Languages
container_volume 5
container_issue 3
container_start_page 29
_version_ 1766219715850534912