Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol

Introduction There is global recognition that low back pain (LBP) should be managed with a biopsychosocial approach. Previous implementation of this approach resulted in low uptake and highlighted the need for ongoing support. This study aims to explore the feasibility of (i) training and using a ch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda Hall, Charlotte Albury, Shabnam Asghari, Bethan Copsey, Andrea Pike, Holly Etchegary, Zara Hansen, Krystal Bursey, Vernon Curran
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Subjects:
R
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040834
https://doaj.org/article/b3e63292caef4d8aa1c26525ac4c2ed1
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b3e63292caef4d8aa1c26525ac4c2ed1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b3e63292caef4d8aa1c26525ac4c2ed1 2023-05-15T17:21:55+02:00 Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol Amanda Hall Charlotte Albury Shabnam Asghari Bethan Copsey Andrea Pike Holly Etchegary Zara Hansen Krystal Bursey Vernon Curran 2020-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040834 https://doaj.org/article/b3e63292caef4d8aa1c26525ac4c2ed1 EN eng BMJ Publishing Group https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e040834.full https://doaj.org/toc/2044-6055 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040834 2044-6055 https://doaj.org/article/b3e63292caef4d8aa1c26525ac4c2ed1 BMJ Open, Vol 10, Iss 11 (2020) Medicine R article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040834 2022-12-31T16:24:24Z Introduction There is global recognition that low back pain (LBP) should be managed with a biopsychosocial approach. Previous implementation of this approach resulted in low uptake and highlighted the need for ongoing support. This study aims to explore the feasibility of (i) training and using a champion to support implementation, (ii) using a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), (iii) collecting patient reported outcome measures in a Canadian public healthcare setting and to identify contextual barriers to implementation.Methods A pragmatic cluster RCT with embedded qualitative study with physiotherapists treating LBP in publicly funded physiotherapy departments in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Participants will complete a previously developed online training course to equip them to deliver a biopsychosocial intervention for LBP. Clusters randomised to the intervention arm will receive additional support from a champion. A minimum champion training package has been developed based on known barriers in the literature. This includes strategies to target barriers relating to group-based scheduling issues, lack of managerial support, perceived patient factors such as addressing patient expectations for other types of treatments or selecting which patients might be best suited for this intervention, and anxiety about delivering something new. This package will be further codeveloped with study champions based on identified implementation barriers using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Clusters will be monitored for 6 months to assess champion and physiotherapist recruitment and retention, acceptability and implementation of the champion training, and the viability of conducting a cluster RCT in this setting. A purposive sample of physiotherapists will be interviewed from both arms.Ethics and dissemination This study was approved by Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Authority in December 2018. Results will be disseminated to academic audiences through conferences and peer reviewed publications; ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Canada Newfoundland
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Medicine
R
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Amanda Hall
Charlotte Albury
Shabnam Asghari
Bethan Copsey
Andrea Pike
Holly Etchegary
Zara Hansen
Krystal Bursey
Vernon Curran
Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol
topic_facet Medicine
R
description Introduction There is global recognition that low back pain (LBP) should be managed with a biopsychosocial approach. Previous implementation of this approach resulted in low uptake and highlighted the need for ongoing support. This study aims to explore the feasibility of (i) training and using a champion to support implementation, (ii) using a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), (iii) collecting patient reported outcome measures in a Canadian public healthcare setting and to identify contextual barriers to implementation.Methods A pragmatic cluster RCT with embedded qualitative study with physiotherapists treating LBP in publicly funded physiotherapy departments in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Participants will complete a previously developed online training course to equip them to deliver a biopsychosocial intervention for LBP. Clusters randomised to the intervention arm will receive additional support from a champion. A minimum champion training package has been developed based on known barriers in the literature. This includes strategies to target barriers relating to group-based scheduling issues, lack of managerial support, perceived patient factors such as addressing patient expectations for other types of treatments or selecting which patients might be best suited for this intervention, and anxiety about delivering something new. This package will be further codeveloped with study champions based on identified implementation barriers using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Clusters will be monitored for 6 months to assess champion and physiotherapist recruitment and retention, acceptability and implementation of the champion training, and the viability of conducting a cluster RCT in this setting. A purposive sample of physiotherapists will be interviewed from both arms.Ethics and dissemination This study was approved by Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Authority in December 2018. Results will be disseminated to academic audiences through conferences and peer reviewed publications; ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Amanda Hall
Charlotte Albury
Shabnam Asghari
Bethan Copsey
Andrea Pike
Holly Etchegary
Zara Hansen
Krystal Bursey
Vernon Curran
author_facet Amanda Hall
Charlotte Albury
Shabnam Asghari
Bethan Copsey
Andrea Pike
Holly Etchegary
Zara Hansen
Krystal Bursey
Vernon Curran
author_sort Amanda Hall
title Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol
title_short Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol
title_full Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol
title_fullStr Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol
title_sort evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the back skills training (best) programme in canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040834
https://doaj.org/article/b3e63292caef4d8aa1c26525ac4c2ed1
geographic Canada
Newfoundland
geographic_facet Canada
Newfoundland
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_source BMJ Open, Vol 10, Iss 11 (2020)
op_relation https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e040834.full
https://doaj.org/toc/2044-6055
doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040834
2044-6055
https://doaj.org/article/b3e63292caef4d8aa1c26525ac4c2ed1
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040834
_version_ 1766107916485525504