Permafrost temperature baseline at 15 m depth on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (2010–2019)

Ground temperature at a fixed depth is a crucial boundary condition for understanding the properties of deep permafrost. However, the commonly used mean annual ground temperature at the depth of the zero annual amplitude (MAGT DZAA ) has certain limitations for extensive application due to large spa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth System Science Data
Main Authors: D. Zou, L. Zhao, G. Hu, E. Du, G. Liu, C. Wang, W. Li
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1731-2025
https://doaj.org/article/b3df4784bccd4b47aa5990f73183069d
_version_ 1833105323622137856
author D. Zou
L. Zhao
G. Hu
E. Du
G. Liu
C. Wang
W. Li
author_facet D. Zou
L. Zhao
G. Hu
E. Du
G. Liu
C. Wang
W. Li
author_sort D. Zou
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1731
container_title Earth System Science Data
container_volume 17
description Ground temperature at a fixed depth is a crucial boundary condition for understanding the properties of deep permafrost. However, the commonly used mean annual ground temperature at the depth of the zero annual amplitude (MAGT DZAA ) has certain limitations for extensive application due to large spatial heterogeneity at observed depths. In this study, we utilized 231 borehole records of mean annual ground temperature at a depth of 15 m (MAGT 15 m ) from 2010 to 2019 and employed a method of support vector regression (SVR) to predict the gridded MAGT 15 m at a spatial resolution of nearly 1 km across the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP). The SVR model predictions demonstrated an R 2 value of 0.48 with a negligible negative overestimation ( − 0.01 °C). The average MAGT 15 m of the QTP permafrost was − 1.85 ± 1.58 °C, with 90 % of the values ranging from − 5.1 to − 0.1 °C and 51.2 % greater than − 1.5 °C. The ground surface freezing degree day (FDD) was the most significant predictor ( p <0.001 ) of MAGT 15 m , followed by the ground surface thawing degree day (TDD), mean annual precipitation (MAP), and soil bulk density (BD) ( p <0.01 ). Overall, the MAGT 15 m increased from northwest to southeast and decreased with rising elevation. Lower MAGT 15 m values prevail in high mountainous areas with steep slopes. The MAGT 15 m was lowest in the headwater areas of the Amu Darya, Indus, and Tarim river basins ( − 2.9 to − 2.7 °C) and highest in the headwater areas of the Yangtze and Yellow river basins ( − 0.9 to − 0.8 °C). The baseline dataset of the MAGT 15 m for the QTP permafrost regions during 2010–2019 will facilitate simulations of deep permafrost characteristics and provide fundamental data for permafrost model validation and improvement. The dataset is openly available in the National Tibetan Plateau Data Center ( https://doi.org/10.11888/Cryos.tpdc.301165 , Zou et al., 2024b).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b3df4784bccd4b47aa5990f73183069d
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
op_container_end_page 1742
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1731-2025
op_relation https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1731/2025/essd-17-1731-2025.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1866-3508
https://doaj.org/toc/1866-3516
https://doaj.org/article/b3df4784bccd4b47aa5990f73183069d
op_source Earth System Science Data, Vol 17, Pp 1731-1742 (2025)
publishDate 2025
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b3df4784bccd4b47aa5990f73183069d 2025-05-25T13:52:50+00:00 Permafrost temperature baseline at 15 m depth on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (2010–2019) D. Zou L. Zhao G. Hu E. Du G. Liu C. Wang W. Li 2025-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1731-2025 https://doaj.org/article/b3df4784bccd4b47aa5990f73183069d EN eng Copernicus Publications https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/17/1731/2025/essd-17-1731-2025.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1866-3508 https://doaj.org/toc/1866-3516 https://doaj.org/article/b3df4784bccd4b47aa5990f73183069d Earth System Science Data, Vol 17, Pp 1731-1742 (2025) Environmental sciences GE1-350 Geology QE1-996.5 article 2025 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1731-2025 2025-04-28T15:07:59Z Ground temperature at a fixed depth is a crucial boundary condition for understanding the properties of deep permafrost. However, the commonly used mean annual ground temperature at the depth of the zero annual amplitude (MAGT DZAA ) has certain limitations for extensive application due to large spatial heterogeneity at observed depths. In this study, we utilized 231 borehole records of mean annual ground temperature at a depth of 15 m (MAGT 15 m ) from 2010 to 2019 and employed a method of support vector regression (SVR) to predict the gridded MAGT 15 m at a spatial resolution of nearly 1 km across the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP). The SVR model predictions demonstrated an R 2 value of 0.48 with a negligible negative overestimation ( − 0.01 °C). The average MAGT 15 m of the QTP permafrost was − 1.85 ± 1.58 °C, with 90 % of the values ranging from − 5.1 to − 0.1 °C and 51.2 % greater than − 1.5 °C. The ground surface freezing degree day (FDD) was the most significant predictor ( p <0.001 ) of MAGT 15 m , followed by the ground surface thawing degree day (TDD), mean annual precipitation (MAP), and soil bulk density (BD) ( p <0.01 ). Overall, the MAGT 15 m increased from northwest to southeast and decreased with rising elevation. Lower MAGT 15 m values prevail in high mountainous areas with steep slopes. The MAGT 15 m was lowest in the headwater areas of the Amu Darya, Indus, and Tarim river basins ( − 2.9 to − 2.7 °C) and highest in the headwater areas of the Yangtze and Yellow river basins ( − 0.9 to − 0.8 °C). The baseline dataset of the MAGT 15 m for the QTP permafrost regions during 2010–2019 will facilitate simulations of deep permafrost characteristics and provide fundamental data for permafrost model validation and improvement. The dataset is openly available in the National Tibetan Plateau Data Center ( https://doi.org/10.11888/Cryos.tpdc.301165 , Zou et al., 2024b). Article in Journal/Newspaper permafrost Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Earth System Science Data 17 4 1731 1742
spellingShingle Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
D. Zou
L. Zhao
G. Hu
E. Du
G. Liu
C. Wang
W. Li
Permafrost temperature baseline at 15 m depth on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (2010–2019)
title Permafrost temperature baseline at 15 m depth on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (2010–2019)
title_full Permafrost temperature baseline at 15 m depth on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (2010–2019)
title_fullStr Permafrost temperature baseline at 15 m depth on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (2010–2019)
title_full_unstemmed Permafrost temperature baseline at 15 m depth on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (2010–2019)
title_short Permafrost temperature baseline at 15 m depth on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (2010–2019)
title_sort permafrost temperature baseline at 15 m depth on the qinghai–tibetan plateau (2010–2019)
topic Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
topic_facet Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
url https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1731-2025
https://doaj.org/article/b3df4784bccd4b47aa5990f73183069d