Effect of organic cultivation technology on row crop yielding capacity

The study aimed to estimate the effect of organic technologies on yielding capacity of row crops in the North-West Russia and the after-effect of compost on the successor crop. Experiments took place in 2020-2022. The crop rotation included the zoned perennial grasses, potato, and table beet. Potato...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:E3S Web of Conferences
Main Authors: Zakharov Anton, Mishanov Alexey, Murzaev Evgeny
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
French
Published: EDP Sciences 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346202006
https://doaj.org/article/b39af7f02f3c4717a560e82b16c2bbd0
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b39af7f02f3c4717a560e82b16c2bbd0
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b39af7f02f3c4717a560e82b16c2bbd0 2024-02-27T08:43:42+00:00 Effect of organic cultivation technology on row crop yielding capacity Zakharov Anton Mishanov Alexey Murzaev Evgeny 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346202006 https://doaj.org/article/b39af7f02f3c4717a560e82b16c2bbd0 EN FR eng fre EDP Sciences https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/99/e3sconf_afe23_02006.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242 2267-1242 doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202346202006 https://doaj.org/article/b39af7f02f3c4717a560e82b16c2bbd0 E3S Web of Conferences, Vol 462, p 02006 (2023) Environmental sciences GE1-350 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346202006 2024-01-28T01:49:27Z The study aimed to estimate the effect of organic technologies on yielding capacity of row crops in the North-West Russia and the after-effect of compost on the successor crop. Experiments took place in 2020-2022. The crop rotation included the zoned perennial grasses, potato, and table beet. Potatoes were fertilised with BIAGUM compost produced from poultry manure in a fermenter. In 2020-2021, the compost application doses were 0 (control), 4 and 8 t ha-1 (5.5 t ha-1 in 2022) or 0 (control), 80 and 160 kg N ha-1 (110 kg N ha-1 in 2022). The table beet was sown on the plots fertilised in the previous year under potatoes. The mechanical weed control of row spacing was performed twice in the growing season. Weather conditions were monitored by the own weather station near the experimental field. The year 2021 was the warmest and the driest in the study period. In 2022, the rainfall was satisfactory for crops – 238.20 mm. In control variants, the potato yields ranged from 12.78 to 20.25 t ha-1 that was 25.6-67.5% of the cultivated variety potential. Application of 4 t ha-1 of compost only slight affected the yield. But with higher compost application dose, a significant yield gain (greatest 56.88%) was observed, especially under favourable climatic conditions of 2020. The biggest beetroot average yield – from 22.5 to 27.7 t ha-1 – was also in 2020. In 2022, the average yield was from 21.5 to 24.3 t ha-1. By the study results, the applied organic technologies proved effective for producing potatoes and table beet in the North-West Russia. Article in Journal/Newspaper North-West Russia Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles E3S Web of Conferences 462 02006
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
French
topic Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Zakharov Anton
Mishanov Alexey
Murzaev Evgeny
Effect of organic cultivation technology on row crop yielding capacity
topic_facet Environmental sciences
GE1-350
description The study aimed to estimate the effect of organic technologies on yielding capacity of row crops in the North-West Russia and the after-effect of compost on the successor crop. Experiments took place in 2020-2022. The crop rotation included the zoned perennial grasses, potato, and table beet. Potatoes were fertilised with BIAGUM compost produced from poultry manure in a fermenter. In 2020-2021, the compost application doses were 0 (control), 4 and 8 t ha-1 (5.5 t ha-1 in 2022) or 0 (control), 80 and 160 kg N ha-1 (110 kg N ha-1 in 2022). The table beet was sown on the plots fertilised in the previous year under potatoes. The mechanical weed control of row spacing was performed twice in the growing season. Weather conditions were monitored by the own weather station near the experimental field. The year 2021 was the warmest and the driest in the study period. In 2022, the rainfall was satisfactory for crops – 238.20 mm. In control variants, the potato yields ranged from 12.78 to 20.25 t ha-1 that was 25.6-67.5% of the cultivated variety potential. Application of 4 t ha-1 of compost only slight affected the yield. But with higher compost application dose, a significant yield gain (greatest 56.88%) was observed, especially under favourable climatic conditions of 2020. The biggest beetroot average yield – from 22.5 to 27.7 t ha-1 – was also in 2020. In 2022, the average yield was from 21.5 to 24.3 t ha-1. By the study results, the applied organic technologies proved effective for producing potatoes and table beet in the North-West Russia.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Zakharov Anton
Mishanov Alexey
Murzaev Evgeny
author_facet Zakharov Anton
Mishanov Alexey
Murzaev Evgeny
author_sort Zakharov Anton
title Effect of organic cultivation technology on row crop yielding capacity
title_short Effect of organic cultivation technology on row crop yielding capacity
title_full Effect of organic cultivation technology on row crop yielding capacity
title_fullStr Effect of organic cultivation technology on row crop yielding capacity
title_full_unstemmed Effect of organic cultivation technology on row crop yielding capacity
title_sort effect of organic cultivation technology on row crop yielding capacity
publisher EDP Sciences
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346202006
https://doaj.org/article/b39af7f02f3c4717a560e82b16c2bbd0
genre North-West Russia
genre_facet North-West Russia
op_source E3S Web of Conferences, Vol 462, p 02006 (2023)
op_relation https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/99/e3sconf_afe23_02006.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242
2267-1242
doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202346202006
https://doaj.org/article/b39af7f02f3c4717a560e82b16c2bbd0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346202006
container_title E3S Web of Conferences
container_volume 462
container_start_page 02006
_version_ 1792051743934119936