The reintroduction of boreal caribou as a conservation strategy: A long-term assessment at the southern range limit

Boreal caribou were extirpated from the Charlevoix region (Québec) in the 1920s because of hunting and poaching. In 1965, the Québec government initiated a caribou reintroduction program in Charlevoix. During the winters of 1966 and 1967, a total of 48 boreal caribou were captured, translocated by p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rangifer
Main Authors: Martin-Hugues St-Laurent, Christian Dussault
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7557/2.32.2.2261
https://doaj.org/article/af0aafe524204e70a488e0d6e0b4fd4b
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:af0aafe524204e70a488e0d6e0b4fd4b
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:af0aafe524204e70a488e0d6e0b4fd4b 2023-05-15T15:53:26+02:00 The reintroduction of boreal caribou as a conservation strategy: A long-term assessment at the southern range limit Martin-Hugues St-Laurent Christian Dussault 2012-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.7557/2.32.2.2261 https://doaj.org/article/af0aafe524204e70a488e0d6e0b4fd4b EN eng Septentrio Academic Publishing https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/2261 https://doaj.org/toc/1890-6729 doi:10.7557/2.32.2.2261 1890-6729 https://doaj.org/article/af0aafe524204e70a488e0d6e0b4fd4b Rangifer, Vol 32, Iss 2 (2012) boreal caribou reintroduction Charlevoix herd conservation tool decline and extirpation landscape disturbance predator-prey relationships Animal culture SF1-1100 article 2012 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.7557/2.32.2.2261 2022-12-31T14:56:11Z Boreal caribou were extirpated from the Charlevoix region (Québec) in the 1920s because of hunting and poaching. In 1965, the Québec government initiated a caribou reintroduction program in Charlevoix. During the winters of 1966 and 1967, a total of 48 boreal caribou were captured, translocated by plane, and released within enclosures; only their offspring (82 individuals) were released in the wild. Between 1967 and 1980, a wolf control program was applied to support caribou population growth. The caribou population, however, remained relatively stable at 45–55 individuals during this period. During the 1980s, the population grew slowly at a rate of approximately 5% each year to reach a peak of 126 individuals in 1992. At that time, Bergerud & Mercer (1989) reported that the Charlevoix experiment was the only successful attempt at caribou reintroduction in the presence of predators (in North America). Afterwards, the population declined and since then it has been relatively stable at about 80 individuals. Here we reviewed the literature regarding the ecology and population dynamics of the Charlevoix caribou herd since its reintroduction, in an attempt to critically assess the value of reintroduction as a conservation tool for this species. Indeed, the Charlevoix caribou herd is now considered at very high risk of extinction mostly because of its small size, its isolation from other caribou populations, and low recruitment. The Charlevoix region has been heavily impacted by forestry activities since the early 1980s. Recent studies have indicated that these habitat modifications may have benefited populations of wolves and black bears—two predators of caribou—and that caribou range fidelity may have exposed caribou to higher predation risk via maladaptive habitat selection. As females are ageing, and females and calves suffer high predation pressure from wolves and bears respectively, we suggest that the future of this reintroduced herd is in question and that they are facing a high probability of extinction ... Article in Journal/Newspaper caribou Rangifer Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Mercer ENVELOPE(65.647,65.647,-70.227,-70.227) Caribou Range ENVELOPE(-125.436,-125.436,59.750,59.750) Rangifer 32 2 127
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic boreal caribou reintroduction
Charlevoix herd
conservation tool
decline and extirpation
landscape disturbance
predator-prey relationships
Animal culture
SF1-1100
spellingShingle boreal caribou reintroduction
Charlevoix herd
conservation tool
decline and extirpation
landscape disturbance
predator-prey relationships
Animal culture
SF1-1100
Martin-Hugues St-Laurent
Christian Dussault
The reintroduction of boreal caribou as a conservation strategy: A long-term assessment at the southern range limit
topic_facet boreal caribou reintroduction
Charlevoix herd
conservation tool
decline and extirpation
landscape disturbance
predator-prey relationships
Animal culture
SF1-1100
description Boreal caribou were extirpated from the Charlevoix region (Québec) in the 1920s because of hunting and poaching. In 1965, the Québec government initiated a caribou reintroduction program in Charlevoix. During the winters of 1966 and 1967, a total of 48 boreal caribou were captured, translocated by plane, and released within enclosures; only their offspring (82 individuals) were released in the wild. Between 1967 and 1980, a wolf control program was applied to support caribou population growth. The caribou population, however, remained relatively stable at 45–55 individuals during this period. During the 1980s, the population grew slowly at a rate of approximately 5% each year to reach a peak of 126 individuals in 1992. At that time, Bergerud & Mercer (1989) reported that the Charlevoix experiment was the only successful attempt at caribou reintroduction in the presence of predators (in North America). Afterwards, the population declined and since then it has been relatively stable at about 80 individuals. Here we reviewed the literature regarding the ecology and population dynamics of the Charlevoix caribou herd since its reintroduction, in an attempt to critically assess the value of reintroduction as a conservation tool for this species. Indeed, the Charlevoix caribou herd is now considered at very high risk of extinction mostly because of its small size, its isolation from other caribou populations, and low recruitment. The Charlevoix region has been heavily impacted by forestry activities since the early 1980s. Recent studies have indicated that these habitat modifications may have benefited populations of wolves and black bears—two predators of caribou—and that caribou range fidelity may have exposed caribou to higher predation risk via maladaptive habitat selection. As females are ageing, and females and calves suffer high predation pressure from wolves and bears respectively, we suggest that the future of this reintroduced herd is in question and that they are facing a high probability of extinction ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Martin-Hugues St-Laurent
Christian Dussault
author_facet Martin-Hugues St-Laurent
Christian Dussault
author_sort Martin-Hugues St-Laurent
title The reintroduction of boreal caribou as a conservation strategy: A long-term assessment at the southern range limit
title_short The reintroduction of boreal caribou as a conservation strategy: A long-term assessment at the southern range limit
title_full The reintroduction of boreal caribou as a conservation strategy: A long-term assessment at the southern range limit
title_fullStr The reintroduction of boreal caribou as a conservation strategy: A long-term assessment at the southern range limit
title_full_unstemmed The reintroduction of boreal caribou as a conservation strategy: A long-term assessment at the southern range limit
title_sort reintroduction of boreal caribou as a conservation strategy: a long-term assessment at the southern range limit
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
publishDate 2012
url https://doi.org/10.7557/2.32.2.2261
https://doaj.org/article/af0aafe524204e70a488e0d6e0b4fd4b
long_lat ENVELOPE(65.647,65.647,-70.227,-70.227)
ENVELOPE(-125.436,-125.436,59.750,59.750)
geographic Mercer
Caribou Range
geographic_facet Mercer
Caribou Range
genre caribou
Rangifer
genre_facet caribou
Rangifer
op_source Rangifer, Vol 32, Iss 2 (2012)
op_relation https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/2261
https://doaj.org/toc/1890-6729
doi:10.7557/2.32.2.2261
1890-6729
https://doaj.org/article/af0aafe524204e70a488e0d6e0b4fd4b
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7557/2.32.2.2261
container_title Rangifer
container_volume 32
container_issue 2
container_start_page 127
_version_ 1766388551384039424