Microbial decomposition processes and vulnerable arctic soil organic carbon in the 21st century

Various levels of representations of biogeochemical processes in current biogeochemistry models contribute to a large uncertainty in carbon budget quantification. Here, we present an uncertainty analysis with a process-based biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM), into which de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeosciences
Main Authors: J. Zha, Q. Zhuang
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5621-2018
https://doaj.org/article/ae444f7ba220409cb55dc52c4f0521eb
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ae444f7ba220409cb55dc52c4f0521eb
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ae444f7ba220409cb55dc52c4f0521eb 2023-05-15T14:54:40+02:00 Microbial decomposition processes and vulnerable arctic soil organic carbon in the 21st century J. Zha Q. Zhuang 2018-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5621-2018 https://doaj.org/article/ae444f7ba220409cb55dc52c4f0521eb EN eng Copernicus Publications https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/5621/2018/bg-15-5621-2018.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1726-4170 https://doaj.org/toc/1726-4189 doi:10.5194/bg-15-5621-2018 1726-4170 1726-4189 https://doaj.org/article/ae444f7ba220409cb55dc52c4f0521eb Biogeosciences, Vol 15, Pp 5621-5634 (2018) Ecology QH540-549.5 Life QH501-531 Geology QE1-996.5 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5621-2018 2022-12-31T12:19:35Z Various levels of representations of biogeochemical processes in current biogeochemistry models contribute to a large uncertainty in carbon budget quantification. Here, we present an uncertainty analysis with a process-based biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM), into which detailed microbial mechanisms were incorporated. Ensemble regional simulations with the new model (MIC-TEM) estimated that the carbon budget of the arctic ecosystems is 76.0±114.8 Pg C during the 20th century, i.e., −3.1±61.7 Pg C under the RCP 2.6 scenario and 94.7±46 Pg C under the RCP 8.5 scenario during the 21st century. Positive values indicate the regional carbon sink while negative values are a source to the atmosphere. Compared to the estimates using a simpler soil decomposition algorithm in TEM, the new model estimated that the arctic terrestrial ecosystems stored 12 Pg less carbon over the 20th century, i.e., 19 and 30 Pg C less under the RCP 8.5 and RCP 2.6 scenarios, respectively, during the 21st century. When soil carbon within depths of 30, 100, and 300 cm was considered as initial carbon in the 21st century simulations, the region was estimated to accumulate 65.4, 88.6, and 109.8 Pg C, respectively, under the RCP 8.5 scenario. In contrast, under the RCP 2.6 scenario, the region lost 0.7, 2.2, and 3 Pg C, respectively, to the atmosphere. We conclude that the future regional carbon budget evaluation largely depends on whether or not adequate microbial activities are represented in earth system models and on the sizes of soil carbon considered in model simulations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Biogeosciences 15 18 5621 5634
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Ecology
QH540-549.5
Life
QH501-531
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Ecology
QH540-549.5
Life
QH501-531
Geology
QE1-996.5
J. Zha
Q. Zhuang
Microbial decomposition processes and vulnerable arctic soil organic carbon in the 21st century
topic_facet Ecology
QH540-549.5
Life
QH501-531
Geology
QE1-996.5
description Various levels of representations of biogeochemical processes in current biogeochemistry models contribute to a large uncertainty in carbon budget quantification. Here, we present an uncertainty analysis with a process-based biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM), into which detailed microbial mechanisms were incorporated. Ensemble regional simulations with the new model (MIC-TEM) estimated that the carbon budget of the arctic ecosystems is 76.0±114.8 Pg C during the 20th century, i.e., −3.1±61.7 Pg C under the RCP 2.6 scenario and 94.7±46 Pg C under the RCP 8.5 scenario during the 21st century. Positive values indicate the regional carbon sink while negative values are a source to the atmosphere. Compared to the estimates using a simpler soil decomposition algorithm in TEM, the new model estimated that the arctic terrestrial ecosystems stored 12 Pg less carbon over the 20th century, i.e., 19 and 30 Pg C less under the RCP 8.5 and RCP 2.6 scenarios, respectively, during the 21st century. When soil carbon within depths of 30, 100, and 300 cm was considered as initial carbon in the 21st century simulations, the region was estimated to accumulate 65.4, 88.6, and 109.8 Pg C, respectively, under the RCP 8.5 scenario. In contrast, under the RCP 2.6 scenario, the region lost 0.7, 2.2, and 3 Pg C, respectively, to the atmosphere. We conclude that the future regional carbon budget evaluation largely depends on whether or not adequate microbial activities are represented in earth system models and on the sizes of soil carbon considered in model simulations.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author J. Zha
Q. Zhuang
author_facet J. Zha
Q. Zhuang
author_sort J. Zha
title Microbial decomposition processes and vulnerable arctic soil organic carbon in the 21st century
title_short Microbial decomposition processes and vulnerable arctic soil organic carbon in the 21st century
title_full Microbial decomposition processes and vulnerable arctic soil organic carbon in the 21st century
title_fullStr Microbial decomposition processes and vulnerable arctic soil organic carbon in the 21st century
title_full_unstemmed Microbial decomposition processes and vulnerable arctic soil organic carbon in the 21st century
title_sort microbial decomposition processes and vulnerable arctic soil organic carbon in the 21st century
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5621-2018
https://doaj.org/article/ae444f7ba220409cb55dc52c4f0521eb
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Biogeosciences, Vol 15, Pp 5621-5634 (2018)
op_relation https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/5621/2018/bg-15-5621-2018.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1726-4170
https://doaj.org/toc/1726-4189
doi:10.5194/bg-15-5621-2018
1726-4170
1726-4189
https://doaj.org/article/ae444f7ba220409cb55dc52c4f0521eb
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5621-2018
container_title Biogeosciences
container_volume 15
container_issue 18
container_start_page 5621
op_container_end_page 5634
_version_ 1766326433986117632