Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B emulsion versus liposomal formulation in Indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a randomized, open-label study.

India is home to 60% of the total global visceral leishmaniasis (VL) population. Use of long-term oral (e.g. miltefosine) and parenteral drugs, considered the mainstay for treatment of VL, is now faced with increased resistance, decreased efficacy, low compliance and safety issues. The authors evalu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Main Authors: Shyam Sundar, Krishna Pandey, Chandreshwar Prasad Thakur, Tara Kant Jha, Vidya Nand Ravi Das, Neena Verma, Chandra Shekhar Lal, Deepak Verma, Shahnawaz Alam, Pradeep Das
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169
https://doaj.org/article/ad87fd1be6a648db80cea6ea84e03747
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ad87fd1be6a648db80cea6ea84e03747
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ad87fd1be6a648db80cea6ea84e03747 2023-05-15T15:14:36+02:00 Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B emulsion versus liposomal formulation in Indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a randomized, open-label study. Shyam Sundar Krishna Pandey Chandreshwar Prasad Thakur Tara Kant Jha Vidya Nand Ravi Das Neena Verma Chandra Shekhar Lal Deepak Verma Shahnawaz Alam Pradeep Das 2014-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169 https://doaj.org/article/ad87fd1be6a648db80cea6ea84e03747 EN eng Public Library of Science (PLoS) http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4169371?pdf=render https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2727 https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2735 1935-2727 1935-2735 doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169 https://doaj.org/article/ad87fd1be6a648db80cea6ea84e03747 PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 8, Iss 9, p e3169 (2014) Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 article 2014 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169 2022-12-31T03:54:36Z India is home to 60% of the total global visceral leishmaniasis (VL) population. Use of long-term oral (e.g. miltefosine) and parenteral drugs, considered the mainstay for treatment of VL, is now faced with increased resistance, decreased efficacy, low compliance and safety issues. The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of an alternate treatment option, i.e. single infusion of preformed amphotericin B (AmB) lipid emulsion (ABLE) in comparison with that of liposomal formulation (LAmB).In this multicentric, open-label study, 500 patients with VL were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive 15 mg/kg single infusion of either ABLE (N = 376) or LAmB (N = 124). Initial cure (Day 30/45), clinical improvement (Day 30) and long term definitive cure (Day 180) were assessed.A total of 326 (86.7%) patients in the ABLE group and 122 (98.4%) patients in the LAmB group completed the study. Initial cure was achieved by 95.9% of patients in the ABLE group compared to 100% in the LAmB group (p = 0.028; 95% CI: -0.0663, -0.0150). Clinical improvement was comparable between treatments (ABLE: 98.9% vs. LAmB: 98.4%). Definitive cure was achieved in 85.9% with ABLE compared to 98.4% with LAmB. Infusion-related pyrexia (37.2% vs. 32.3%) and chills (18.4% vs. 18.5%) were comparable between ABLE and LAmB, respectively. Treatment-related serious adverse events were fewer in ABLE (0.3%) compared to LAmB (1.6%). Two deaths occurred in the ABLE group, of which one was probably related to the study drug. Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity was not observed in either group.ABLE 15 mg/kg single infusion had favorable efficacy and was well tolerated. Considering the demographic profile of the population in this region, a single dose treatment offers advantages in terms of compliance, cost and applicability.www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00876824. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Indian PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 8 9 e3169
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Shyam Sundar
Krishna Pandey
Chandreshwar Prasad Thakur
Tara Kant Jha
Vidya Nand Ravi Das
Neena Verma
Chandra Shekhar Lal
Deepak Verma
Shahnawaz Alam
Pradeep Das
Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B emulsion versus liposomal formulation in Indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a randomized, open-label study.
topic_facet Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
description India is home to 60% of the total global visceral leishmaniasis (VL) population. Use of long-term oral (e.g. miltefosine) and parenteral drugs, considered the mainstay for treatment of VL, is now faced with increased resistance, decreased efficacy, low compliance and safety issues. The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of an alternate treatment option, i.e. single infusion of preformed amphotericin B (AmB) lipid emulsion (ABLE) in comparison with that of liposomal formulation (LAmB).In this multicentric, open-label study, 500 patients with VL were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive 15 mg/kg single infusion of either ABLE (N = 376) or LAmB (N = 124). Initial cure (Day 30/45), clinical improvement (Day 30) and long term definitive cure (Day 180) were assessed.A total of 326 (86.7%) patients in the ABLE group and 122 (98.4%) patients in the LAmB group completed the study. Initial cure was achieved by 95.9% of patients in the ABLE group compared to 100% in the LAmB group (p = 0.028; 95% CI: -0.0663, -0.0150). Clinical improvement was comparable between treatments (ABLE: 98.9% vs. LAmB: 98.4%). Definitive cure was achieved in 85.9% with ABLE compared to 98.4% with LAmB. Infusion-related pyrexia (37.2% vs. 32.3%) and chills (18.4% vs. 18.5%) were comparable between ABLE and LAmB, respectively. Treatment-related serious adverse events were fewer in ABLE (0.3%) compared to LAmB (1.6%). Two deaths occurred in the ABLE group, of which one was probably related to the study drug. Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity was not observed in either group.ABLE 15 mg/kg single infusion had favorable efficacy and was well tolerated. Considering the demographic profile of the population in this region, a single dose treatment offers advantages in terms of compliance, cost and applicability.www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00876824.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Shyam Sundar
Krishna Pandey
Chandreshwar Prasad Thakur
Tara Kant Jha
Vidya Nand Ravi Das
Neena Verma
Chandra Shekhar Lal
Deepak Verma
Shahnawaz Alam
Pradeep Das
author_facet Shyam Sundar
Krishna Pandey
Chandreshwar Prasad Thakur
Tara Kant Jha
Vidya Nand Ravi Das
Neena Verma
Chandra Shekhar Lal
Deepak Verma
Shahnawaz Alam
Pradeep Das
author_sort Shyam Sundar
title Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B emulsion versus liposomal formulation in Indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a randomized, open-label study.
title_short Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B emulsion versus liposomal formulation in Indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a randomized, open-label study.
title_full Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B emulsion versus liposomal formulation in Indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a randomized, open-label study.
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B emulsion versus liposomal formulation in Indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a randomized, open-label study.
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B emulsion versus liposomal formulation in Indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a randomized, open-label study.
title_sort efficacy and safety of amphotericin b emulsion versus liposomal formulation in indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a randomized, open-label study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169
https://doaj.org/article/ad87fd1be6a648db80cea6ea84e03747
geographic Arctic
Indian
geographic_facet Arctic
Indian
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 8, Iss 9, p e3169 (2014)
op_relation http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4169371?pdf=render
https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2727
https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2735
1935-2727
1935-2735
doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169
https://doaj.org/article/ad87fd1be6a648db80cea6ea84e03747
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169
container_title PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
container_volume 8
container_issue 9
container_start_page e3169
_version_ 1766345035993841664