Developments in Icelandic Security Policy

Iceland has been slow in developing a national security concept, for reasons that include a long period of reliance on US protection post-World War Two, and divided internal views over this defence solution. Since the withdrawal of all US stationed forces in 2006, Iceland’s security partnerships hav...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alyson J.K. Bailes, Kristmundur Þór Ólafsson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Icelandic
Published: University of Iceland 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/ad5c64aef5dd4a638ab20d7926e9c031
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ad5c64aef5dd4a638ab20d7926e9c031
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ad5c64aef5dd4a638ab20d7926e9c031 2023-05-15T16:50:21+02:00 Developments in Icelandic Security Policy Alyson J.K. Bailes Kristmundur Þór Ólafsson 2014-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/ad5c64aef5dd4a638ab20d7926e9c031 EN IS eng ice University of Iceland http://www.irpa.is/article/view/1621 https://doaj.org/toc/1670-6803 https://doaj.org/toc/1670-679X 1670-6803 1670-679X https://doaj.org/article/ad5c64aef5dd4a638ab20d7926e9c031 Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 1-16 (2014) Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Political science (General) JA1-92 article 2014 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-31T15:58:10Z Iceland has been slow in developing a national security concept, for reasons that include a long period of reliance on US protection post-World War Two, and divided internal views over this defence solution. Since the withdrawal of all US stationed forces in 2006, Iceland’s security partnerships have diversified and attempts have been made to frame security in more multi-functional terms. The Risk Assessment Report of 2009 made important progress in itemizing non-military threats and risks. On this basis, a cross-party parliamentary committee was invited to start work in 2012 on guidelines for a security strategy. Its report, published in March 2014, establishes a large area of consensus on ‘softer’ security issues and on remaining in NATO, with a few dissenting voices on the latter. Its main omission is a proper treatment of economic and financial security, still tied to the divisive issue of EU membership. Meanwhile, Iceland’s recent security experience in 2014 has helped to highlight the reality of both harder and softer security challenges. The government can now proceed to draft a full official security strategy, to be laid before parliament possibly in 2015. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Icelandic
topic Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Political science (General)
JA1-92
spellingShingle Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Alyson J.K. Bailes
Kristmundur Þór Ólafsson
Developments in Icelandic Security Policy
topic_facet Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Political science (General)
JA1-92
description Iceland has been slow in developing a national security concept, for reasons that include a long period of reliance on US protection post-World War Two, and divided internal views over this defence solution. Since the withdrawal of all US stationed forces in 2006, Iceland’s security partnerships have diversified and attempts have been made to frame security in more multi-functional terms. The Risk Assessment Report of 2009 made important progress in itemizing non-military threats and risks. On this basis, a cross-party parliamentary committee was invited to start work in 2012 on guidelines for a security strategy. Its report, published in March 2014, establishes a large area of consensus on ‘softer’ security issues and on remaining in NATO, with a few dissenting voices on the latter. Its main omission is a proper treatment of economic and financial security, still tied to the divisive issue of EU membership. Meanwhile, Iceland’s recent security experience in 2014 has helped to highlight the reality of both harder and softer security challenges. The government can now proceed to draft a full official security strategy, to be laid before parliament possibly in 2015.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Alyson J.K. Bailes
Kristmundur Þór Ólafsson
author_facet Alyson J.K. Bailes
Kristmundur Þór Ólafsson
author_sort Alyson J.K. Bailes
title Developments in Icelandic Security Policy
title_short Developments in Icelandic Security Policy
title_full Developments in Icelandic Security Policy
title_fullStr Developments in Icelandic Security Policy
title_full_unstemmed Developments in Icelandic Security Policy
title_sort developments in icelandic security policy
publisher University of Iceland
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/ad5c64aef5dd4a638ab20d7926e9c031
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 1-16 (2014)
op_relation http://www.irpa.is/article/view/1621
https://doaj.org/toc/1670-6803
https://doaj.org/toc/1670-679X
1670-6803
1670-679X
https://doaj.org/article/ad5c64aef5dd4a638ab20d7926e9c031
_version_ 1766040513833598976