Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps

In Canada, comprehensive land claims agreements – often called modern treaties – between the government and Indigenous nations include provisions prescribing how disputes between treaty parties are to be resolved. Experiences with these dispute resolution mechanisms vary across treaty contexts and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Main Author: David Wright
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Norwegian
Published: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2020
Subjects:
adr
Law
K
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2519
https://doaj.org/article/ad0b8cbbd721474da42bcdfdbfb3544e
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ad0b8cbbd721474da42bcdfdbfb3544e
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ad0b8cbbd721474da42bcdfdbfb3544e 2023-05-15T14:21:32+02:00 Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps David Wright 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2519 https://doaj.org/article/ad0b8cbbd721474da42bcdfdbfb3544e EN NO eng nor Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519/4830 https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562 2387-4562 doi:10.23865/arctic.v11.2519 https://doaj.org/article/ad0b8cbbd721474da42bcdfdbfb3544e Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 11, Iss 0, Pp 280-309 (2020) dispute resolution conflict resolution adr modern treaties indigenous law land claim agreements Law K article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2519 2022-12-30T22:04:44Z In Canada, comprehensive land claims agreements – often called modern treaties – between the government and Indigenous nations include provisions prescribing how disputes between treaty parties are to be resolved. Experiences with these dispute resolution mechanisms vary across treaty contexts and there is substantial variance in the terms of these treaties. To date, this dimension of modern treaty implementation has received minimal scholarly attention, despite calls for such research. Drawing on specific examples, this article sets a foundation for further research by examining the significant variation across different treaties’ dispute resolution mechanisms and commenting on key differences, similarities and other notable features. A key focus of the analysis is on the observable evolution of these mechanisms from a relatively narrow arbitration board model to a more flexible “staged approach”. The analysis suggests that the latter may provide a stronger basis for joint problem-solving and integrative bargaining, notwithstanding open questions about the extent to which such approaches are warranted in fraught Crown-Indigenous relationships in Canada. The article also discusses the conspicuous absence of dispute resolution mechanisms that accommodate, let alone require, approaches rooted in the traditional or cultural practices of Indigenous treaty parties. Observations throughout are contextualized in relation to a growing body of jurisprudence and a broader context of fast-changing federal law and policy in Canada, which may set the stage for amendments to the dispute resolution provisions of modern treaties. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic review on law and politics Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Canada Arctic Review on Law and Politics 11 0 280
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
Norwegian
topic dispute resolution
conflict resolution
adr
modern treaties
indigenous law
land claim agreements
Law
K
spellingShingle dispute resolution
conflict resolution
adr
modern treaties
indigenous law
land claim agreements
Law
K
David Wright
Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
topic_facet dispute resolution
conflict resolution
adr
modern treaties
indigenous law
land claim agreements
Law
K
description In Canada, comprehensive land claims agreements – often called modern treaties – between the government and Indigenous nations include provisions prescribing how disputes between treaty parties are to be resolved. Experiences with these dispute resolution mechanisms vary across treaty contexts and there is substantial variance in the terms of these treaties. To date, this dimension of modern treaty implementation has received minimal scholarly attention, despite calls for such research. Drawing on specific examples, this article sets a foundation for further research by examining the significant variation across different treaties’ dispute resolution mechanisms and commenting on key differences, similarities and other notable features. A key focus of the analysis is on the observable evolution of these mechanisms from a relatively narrow arbitration board model to a more flexible “staged approach”. The analysis suggests that the latter may provide a stronger basis for joint problem-solving and integrative bargaining, notwithstanding open questions about the extent to which such approaches are warranted in fraught Crown-Indigenous relationships in Canada. The article also discusses the conspicuous absence of dispute resolution mechanisms that accommodate, let alone require, approaches rooted in the traditional or cultural practices of Indigenous treaty parties. Observations throughout are contextualized in relation to a growing body of jurisprudence and a broader context of fast-changing federal law and policy in Canada, which may set the stage for amendments to the dispute resolution provisions of modern treaties.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author David Wright
author_facet David Wright
author_sort David Wright
title Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
title_short Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
title_full Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
title_fullStr Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
title_full_unstemmed Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
title_sort dispute resolution in modern treaties: evolutions, observations and next steps
publisher Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2519
https://doaj.org/article/ad0b8cbbd721474da42bcdfdbfb3544e
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
op_source Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 11, Iss 0, Pp 280-309 (2020)
op_relation https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519/4830
https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562
2387-4562
doi:10.23865/arctic.v11.2519
https://doaj.org/article/ad0b8cbbd721474da42bcdfdbfb3544e
op_doi https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2519
container_title Arctic Review on Law and Politics
container_volume 11
container_issue 0
container_start_page 280
_version_ 1766294240323698688