Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere
Governance of marine resources is increasingly characterized by integrated, cross sectoral and ecosystem based approaches. Such approaches require that existing governing bodies have an ability to adapt to ecosystem dynamics, while also providing transparent and legitimate outcomes. Here, we investi...
Published in: | International Journal of the Commons |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.532 https://doaj.org/article/ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b 2023-05-15T13:42:00+02:00 Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere Matilda Valman Henrik Österblom Per Olsson 2015-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.532 https://doaj.org/article/ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b EN eng Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/532 https://doaj.org/toc/1875-0281 1875-0281 doi:10.18352/ijc.532 https://doaj.org/article/ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b International Journal of the Commons, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 440-465 (2015) adaptive governance ecosystem approach helcom Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 article 2015 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.532 2023-01-08T01:34:00Z Governance of marine resources is increasingly characterized by integrated, cross sectoral and ecosystem based approaches. Such approaches require that existing governing bodies have an ability to adapt to ecosystem dynamics, while also providing transparent and legitimate outcomes. Here, we investigate how the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM), the international governing body for the Baltic Sea, could improve its prospects for working with the ecosystem approach, drawing from the literature on adaptive governance. We construct an ideal type of adaptive governance to which we compare the way in which HELCOM is operating and relate these dynamics to two other international marine environment governance organizations, the Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF) and the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). We conclude that HELCOM deviates from an ideal type of adaptive governance in several ways but also that the other two case studies provide empirical support for potential ways in which HELCOM could improve its adaptive capacity. Key aspects where HELCOM could improve include increasing stakeholder participation – both in information sharing and decision making. Further, HELCOM need to develop evaluation mechanisms, secure compliance to improve adaptive capacity and organizational effectiveness, which entails the development of structures for conflict resolution. Finally, HELCOM need to increase communication and harmonization between different levels of authority. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Antarctic International Journal of the Commons 9 1 440 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
adaptive governance ecosystem approach helcom Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 |
spellingShingle |
adaptive governance ecosystem approach helcom Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Matilda Valman Henrik Österblom Per Olsson Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere |
topic_facet |
adaptive governance ecosystem approach helcom Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 |
description |
Governance of marine resources is increasingly characterized by integrated, cross sectoral and ecosystem based approaches. Such approaches require that existing governing bodies have an ability to adapt to ecosystem dynamics, while also providing transparent and legitimate outcomes. Here, we investigate how the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM), the international governing body for the Baltic Sea, could improve its prospects for working with the ecosystem approach, drawing from the literature on adaptive governance. We construct an ideal type of adaptive governance to which we compare the way in which HELCOM is operating and relate these dynamics to two other international marine environment governance organizations, the Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF) and the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). We conclude that HELCOM deviates from an ideal type of adaptive governance in several ways but also that the other two case studies provide empirical support for potential ways in which HELCOM could improve its adaptive capacity. Key aspects where HELCOM could improve include increasing stakeholder participation – both in information sharing and decision making. Further, HELCOM need to develop evaluation mechanisms, secure compliance to improve adaptive capacity and organizational effectiveness, which entails the development of structures for conflict resolution. Finally, HELCOM need to increase communication and harmonization between different levels of authority. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Matilda Valman Henrik Österblom Per Olsson |
author_facet |
Matilda Valman Henrik Österblom Per Olsson |
author_sort |
Matilda Valman |
title |
Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere |
title_short |
Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere |
title_full |
Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere |
title_fullStr |
Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere |
title_sort |
adaptive governance of the baltic sea - lessons from elsewhere |
publisher |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.532 https://doaj.org/article/ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b |
geographic |
Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic |
op_source |
International Journal of the Commons, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 440-465 (2015) |
op_relation |
https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/532 https://doaj.org/toc/1875-0281 1875-0281 doi:10.18352/ijc.532 https://doaj.org/article/ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.532 |
container_title |
International Journal of the Commons |
container_volume |
9 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
440 |
_version_ |
1766161759228395520 |