Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere

Governance of marine resources is increasingly characterized by integrated, cross sectoral and ecosystem based approaches. Such approaches require that existing governing bodies have an ability to adapt to ecosystem dynamics, while also providing transparent and legitimate outcomes. Here, we investi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of the Commons
Main Authors: Matilda Valman, Henrik Österblom, Per Olsson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.532
https://doaj.org/article/ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b 2023-05-15T13:42:00+02:00 Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere Matilda Valman Henrik Österblom Per Olsson 2015-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.532 https://doaj.org/article/ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b EN eng Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/532 https://doaj.org/toc/1875-0281 1875-0281 doi:10.18352/ijc.532 https://doaj.org/article/ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b International Journal of the Commons, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 440-465 (2015) adaptive governance ecosystem approach helcom Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 article 2015 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.532 2023-01-08T01:34:00Z Governance of marine resources is increasingly characterized by integrated, cross sectoral and ecosystem based approaches. Such approaches require that existing governing bodies have an ability to adapt to ecosystem dynamics, while also providing transparent and legitimate outcomes. Here, we investigate how the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM), the international governing body for the Baltic Sea, could improve its prospects for working with the ecosystem approach, drawing from the literature on adaptive governance. We construct an ideal type of adaptive governance to which we compare the way in which HELCOM is operating and relate these dynamics to two other international marine environment governance organizations, the Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF) and the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). We conclude that HELCOM deviates from an ideal type of adaptive governance in several ways but also that the other two case studies provide empirical support for potential ways in which HELCOM could improve its adaptive capacity. Key aspects where HELCOM could improve include increasing stakeholder participation – both in information sharing and decision making. Further, HELCOM need to develop evaluation mechanisms, secure compliance to improve adaptive capacity and organizational effectiveness, which entails the development of structures for conflict resolution. Finally, HELCOM need to increase communication and harmonization between different levels of authority. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Antarctic International Journal of the Commons 9 1 440
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic adaptive governance
ecosystem approach
helcom
Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
spellingShingle adaptive governance
ecosystem approach
helcom
Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Matilda Valman
Henrik Österblom
Per Olsson
Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere
topic_facet adaptive governance
ecosystem approach
helcom
Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
description Governance of marine resources is increasingly characterized by integrated, cross sectoral and ecosystem based approaches. Such approaches require that existing governing bodies have an ability to adapt to ecosystem dynamics, while also providing transparent and legitimate outcomes. Here, we investigate how the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM), the international governing body for the Baltic Sea, could improve its prospects for working with the ecosystem approach, drawing from the literature on adaptive governance. We construct an ideal type of adaptive governance to which we compare the way in which HELCOM is operating and relate these dynamics to two other international marine environment governance organizations, the Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF) and the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). We conclude that HELCOM deviates from an ideal type of adaptive governance in several ways but also that the other two case studies provide empirical support for potential ways in which HELCOM could improve its adaptive capacity. Key aspects where HELCOM could improve include increasing stakeholder participation – both in information sharing and decision making. Further, HELCOM need to develop evaluation mechanisms, secure compliance to improve adaptive capacity and organizational effectiveness, which entails the development of structures for conflict resolution. Finally, HELCOM need to increase communication and harmonization between different levels of authority.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Matilda Valman
Henrik Österblom
Per Olsson
author_facet Matilda Valman
Henrik Österblom
Per Olsson
author_sort Matilda Valman
title Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere
title_short Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere
title_full Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere
title_fullStr Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea - lessons from elsewhere
title_sort adaptive governance of the baltic sea - lessons from elsewhere
publisher Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.532
https://doaj.org/article/ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_source International Journal of the Commons, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 440-465 (2015)
op_relation https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/532
https://doaj.org/toc/1875-0281
1875-0281
doi:10.18352/ijc.532
https://doaj.org/article/ac446b642dd64fa98509cfdc51e0b20b
op_doi https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.532
container_title International Journal of the Commons
container_volume 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 440
_version_ 1766161759228395520