Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO 2 in Alaska

Alaska holds more than 68 billion barrels of proved oil reserves and more than 36.7 trillion cubic feet of proved natural gas reserves with some special conditions such as proximity to permafrost, making Alaskan petroleum reserves unique. The low temperature in shallow reservoirs prohibited hydrocar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geosciences
Main Authors: Banabas Dogah, Vahid Atashbari, Mohabbat Ahmadi, Brent Sheets
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098
https://doaj.org/article/aa3f69876e6b48f2b74afeb61a265554
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:aa3f69876e6b48f2b74afeb61a265554
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:aa3f69876e6b48f2b74afeb61a265554 2024-01-14T10:09:52+01:00 Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO 2 in Alaska Banabas Dogah Vahid Atashbari Mohabbat Ahmadi Brent Sheets 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098 https://doaj.org/article/aa3f69876e6b48f2b74afeb61a265554 EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/11/2/98 https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3263 doi:10.3390/geosciences11020098 2076-3263 https://doaj.org/article/aa3f69876e6b48f2b74afeb61a265554 Geosciences, Vol 11, Iss 2, p 98 (2021) CO 2 carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery Alaska heavy oil viscous oil Geology QE1-996.5 article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098 2023-12-17T01:45:32Z Alaska holds more than 68 billion barrels of proved oil reserves and more than 36.7 trillion cubic feet of proved natural gas reserves with some special conditions such as proximity to permafrost, making Alaskan petroleum reserves unique. The low temperature in shallow reservoirs prohibited hydrocarbons’ ideal maturation, thereby generating several heavy and viscous oil accumulations in this state. This also limits the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) options, leaving the thermal methods off the table to avoid permafrost thawing, which can cause wellbore collapse. Several solutions have been attempted for improving oil production from heavy and viscous oil in Alaska; however, they have not yielded the desired recovery, and ultimate recovery factors are still less than the global average. One solution identified as a better alternative is using CO 2 as an injecting fluid, alternated by water or mixed with other injectants. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all studies on using CO 2 for enhanced oil recovery purposes in Alaska and highlights common and unique challenges this approach may face. The suitability of CO 2 -EOR methods in the Alaskan oil pools is examined, and a ranking of the oil pools with publicly available data is provided. Article in Journal/Newspaper permafrost Alaska Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Geosciences 11 2 98
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic CO 2
carbon dioxide
enhanced oil recovery
Alaska
heavy oil
viscous oil
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle CO 2
carbon dioxide
enhanced oil recovery
Alaska
heavy oil
viscous oil
Geology
QE1-996.5
Banabas Dogah
Vahid Atashbari
Mohabbat Ahmadi
Brent Sheets
Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO 2 in Alaska
topic_facet CO 2
carbon dioxide
enhanced oil recovery
Alaska
heavy oil
viscous oil
Geology
QE1-996.5
description Alaska holds more than 68 billion barrels of proved oil reserves and more than 36.7 trillion cubic feet of proved natural gas reserves with some special conditions such as proximity to permafrost, making Alaskan petroleum reserves unique. The low temperature in shallow reservoirs prohibited hydrocarbons’ ideal maturation, thereby generating several heavy and viscous oil accumulations in this state. This also limits the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) options, leaving the thermal methods off the table to avoid permafrost thawing, which can cause wellbore collapse. Several solutions have been attempted for improving oil production from heavy and viscous oil in Alaska; however, they have not yielded the desired recovery, and ultimate recovery factors are still less than the global average. One solution identified as a better alternative is using CO 2 as an injecting fluid, alternated by water or mixed with other injectants. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all studies on using CO 2 for enhanced oil recovery purposes in Alaska and highlights common and unique challenges this approach may face. The suitability of CO 2 -EOR methods in the Alaskan oil pools is examined, and a ranking of the oil pools with publicly available data is provided.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Banabas Dogah
Vahid Atashbari
Mohabbat Ahmadi
Brent Sheets
author_facet Banabas Dogah
Vahid Atashbari
Mohabbat Ahmadi
Brent Sheets
author_sort Banabas Dogah
title Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO 2 in Alaska
title_short Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO 2 in Alaska
title_full Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO 2 in Alaska
title_fullStr Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO 2 in Alaska
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO 2 in Alaska
title_sort enhanced oil recovery using co 2 in alaska
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098
https://doaj.org/article/aa3f69876e6b48f2b74afeb61a265554
genre permafrost
Alaska
genre_facet permafrost
Alaska
op_source Geosciences, Vol 11, Iss 2, p 98 (2021)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/11/2/98
https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3263
doi:10.3390/geosciences11020098
2076-3263
https://doaj.org/article/aa3f69876e6b48f2b74afeb61a265554
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098
container_title Geosciences
container_volume 11
container_issue 2
container_start_page 98
_version_ 1788064452290019328